Jeremiwilks.com

Why I am anti-defense & military

2011-09-21T11:42:00.000-07:00

If you think about the political culture of 19th centjury Southern US, you could understand where I was coming from on that some called rude comment about not honoring those who sacrifice so I can be free. That giving one's life or risking one's life to save others is the greatest thing one can do.

Obviously those who stand for that, don't talk to people like me. I think each state should have it's own private military; made up of the same kinds fo people city police, fire, and medical teams are made of: locals who trained for the job. I on the other hand, would rather do business or pay some family to send a replacement to fight. That's just me. My father was a businessman, so that is all I know.

When the Civil War broke out, just like most people today, who read about John D. Rockefeller & his involvment in that war would find": if you could financially afford to stay out of the war, you could, otherwise you had to enlist. Although I wanted the south to win that war, I was more interested in maintaining an income than risk my life for the Southern Cause. But I did the same thing Rockefeller did during that war: I sold to each side.

Now I don 't know if Rockefeller sold to the south (he was damn yankee of course), but for me, I maintained th existance of my famiilys plantation by selling to both sides. When WWI came along, I was allowed to do the same thing: I paid a poorer family to send their young into battle. I remained @ home do conduct business. However, my anger about national military didn't grow until WWII.

When that one came along, I looked to see if I could pay for a replacement, even w/ all the propoganda about how rotten Uncle Sam made the National Socalist German Workers Party. But in the end there weren't enough people volunteering. So I was mailed a letter to apear in an army recruiting office to get convinced. Even when I went, I didn't believe them. I told them all I was hearing was the allied side; I wasn't hearing the nazi side. This really shocked the officers. They then pulled the Depression card.

They asked if I had been doing any business in the last decade? I said hardly any, b/c there was no work. So they offered Wilks Enterprises (the company I'd opened a little over a decade prior) a government contract. I would go to Europe & kill as many nazis & bring back prooff of death by the time the war ended. I needed the money, even if I hadn't gotten the nazis story of why they declared war.

So I flew over to France. & took a train to Berlin. The 1st morning in Berlin I went to a Nazi recruitment offices & explained myself. They were glad was not there to kill them, like most Americans they heard. They toook me into a library & explained the platform to me. I was amazed: they stood for many of the things I stood for.

Before I left, I wrote a check for a donation to the party from my personal accounts, then left to think over what they had said. Thay afternoon I got a telegraph from the army recruitment office back in the states askig me how many nazis I had killed. I felt so unbalanced by the letter. I was up all that night debating w/ myself over what to do: I agreed w/ the nazis, but I needed the money. I would be broke by the end of the decade.

So the next day, against my better judgment, I went on a killing spree. By the end of the war I'd killed 235 people. I felt ill & couldn't keep very much food down the entire time I was there.

I returned home to a heros welcome. If you google me you should be able to an aged pic of me in a group of younger men being awarded the medal of honor, or maybe it was freedom, by Pres Truman. Every time I'm asked what I did to serve I said all this. When they ask how it felt, I'm honest: I say terrible, I couldn't keep food in my stomach. W/ that less & less people ask me.

When Korea came, I didn't go. Didn't agree w/ that war. When Vietnam came I didn't have to go either. I disagreed w/ that war too. Most of the wars America has been involved in in the last 50 yrs I did't agree w/. But it seems my opinion doesnt count, as you can see we have gone to war several times since WWII.

So now you know why I am anti-military. I'd rather be a businessman & than defend the country. Cheers.

Re; my facebook status

2011-07-20T12:02:00.000-07:00

Continuing from where I left off on facebk (b/c each status update can only be 420 characters long), I think those being listed on Forbes 400 should be called rich. What's so embarassing to conservative republicans that those who are really well off can't being labeled as rich? I think the same goes for Mexicans being called wetbacks, jews, being called kykes, black niggers, & so on. If that sounds racist, just remeber people, the kinds of people Americas founding fathers were:

They were racist, sexist, bigoted blasphemiers. Know your history. Rich people should not have to hide behind labels or their wealth not found out until an accident or crime occurs. They should be proud that they used near-slave labor to make their millions (or in my case, billions). The founding fathers were wealthy & they all had slaves.

Think about the Waltons (all billionaires) & they use near slave wage earners in all their stores. & now 1.5M women were forced by SCOTUS to sue, not together, but as individuals. Lucky for Walmart that there are conservative pro-business justices on the court. Otherwise Walmart would end up like Big Tobacco: having to settle out of court for hundreds of millions. How the hell would the Waltons pay for everything, any one who picks up a couple of Forbes or Fortune magazine, sold in those periodicals?

Power to the job creators. W/o them, the economy would be worse off, & the unemployment rate would be higher. More later.

Hi from Facebook!

2011-07-04T17:11:00.000-07:00

All of you who come here for right-wing bashing comments & pro-business rhetoric; I just today, opened a facebook account. So for those of you who are already on facebook; look me up & ask to be friends. I may be there more than I am here since opening that account was mostly brought on by all of you who were there already & rather go there than here.

I'll be back.

Saw INSIDE JOB on dvd today; my take

2011-06-16T18:00:00.001-07:00

I really can't comment on the public reaction to this film b/c I ALSO LOBBY PUBLIC OFFICIALS to cut regulations. That is why I can make as much as I do. However, I should pt out those who appeared in this film who, like the film stated, would not comment or refused an interview for it.

They are the sponsors of people who push the 'line' that I, as a big business head, make a living on. However, very few of those who pay the network news anchors (NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, FOX NEWS) salaries are willing to come out & stand by, how the people on my side, the radical left liberals, claim we big business bosses live.

I'm talking about the high life, lived by Wall St.'ers during the tech, housing, & credit booms of the last 20 yrs. If you don't know what I mean, pick up a copy of this movie see what kind of life people like me live. However, I do not do one thing that was pted out about Wall St banker private entertainment. I'm talking about high priced hookers & strippers. While I don't hire girls to have sex w/, I do do have an active sex life w/ the girls of USC here in Columbia.

Since I am a single parent, I have every right to sleep around. Erics mother was a victim of a shooting massacre down on one of the Caribbean Islands in the early 80s, & Katies parents were killed while yachting off LAs coast when their boat blow up.

I went way off the topic there. I'll just say that I do lobby public officials to allow me to keep more profits as well as make sure I can maintain my stand against affirmative action, equal opportunity laws & labor unions. Lemme hear ya say amen.

Jeremi Wilks on Facebook? I'm thinking about it.

2011-06-15T18:18:00.000-07:00

Yes people, I am. It has been brought to my attention that if I only had this site, & wge.com, to sell my shit on, I really am not up to date. Many of my fans are bummed that I am not on Facebook yet. They tell me, "you're so out of date, that the people you talk shit about jumped on the Facebook bandwagon already." Well that kicked my ass.

My fans on this site as well as email comments @ wge.com were @ 1st curious why, if so many of my products are straight out of sci-fi, why am I not on Facebook? But that started before I threw this site on the web.

Now, in the last 6-12 months, those fans of mine who are already ON Facebook, have started commenting here that they're giving me an ultimatum: while once logged into Facebook, they have a helluva time leaving the site (the site has games that keep you on the site, & has suggestions or offers to help you search for those who are only FRIENDS OF THOSE YOU'RE FRIENDS W/, no one you would know, only those your friends are friends w/), the fact that I'M NOT ON IT, will help them break them of their addiction.

But then you're probably asking, "Aren't Eric or Katie on Facebook?" Well they were for the 1st yr they created their accounts. Then after another 6 months of logging on & checking out the site, then Eric graduated from USC last yr, & Katie this yr, they just either haven't had the time or are better able to control the time they're logged in. They have told me, in the last 3 months, they spent a max of 1 hr a month logged in, otherwise, the site logs them out after a long period of inactivity.

But again, Katie & Eric's friends on Facebook, post info they both don't care about. They do have fans, mostly from films they made w/ my production company I founded in 1970 (Reflections), or Katies friends from USC's cheer squad as well as people she met in her classes. & the people they friend on Facebook are each about to pass 5,000 come next month. I would expect to friend upwards of about 50,000 people if I opened a Facebook account. I know this from the hundreds of emails & comments I get here & & wge.com asking , "why the fuck aren't I on Facebook?".

Therefore I have a tiny pinpoint itch to get a Facebook account on my birthday this yr. Yes, people. I have had this site since Dec of 07, but don't count me in yet for a Facebook page. You can count me in more for running for the democratic nomination for pres than getting a facebook page. But I do have an itch. I may decide to sign up & open one on my birthday.

I will be back.

The DJIA hit just above the 12K mark yesterday

2011-06-09T09:26:00.000-07:00

People, I am laughing my ASS OFF @ all those who DIDN'T get into the stock market yesterday afternoon, &, I congratulate those who DID. Why? If you were watching the Dow yesterday, it landed @ 12,08-something, right? Just above the 12K mark. I, as a client of WGE's securities brokerage subsidiary, J. Wilks & Co., (so named from my days @ JP Morgan & Co in the 1890s), bought about $100 million in stock from across the Dow.

Won't say who they were, the SEC would consider that insider trading.

However, it should be obvious to most of you stock market watchers that, although the Dow dropped by OVER 800 pts since May Day (May 1) last month, as of today it regained about (where is it now, as I switch back to the window showing my open portfolio on jwilks.com/myportfolio) 163 pts. That is quite good, isn't it? Good for any of you who jumped in yesterday afternoon, when it was about to drop below 12K, you WILL make a pretty penny.

However, since I predicted that Obama wouldn't (& won't) be able to seal a land agreement between the kykes & the palestinians prior to his reelecton next yr, here is my prediction for the Dow for the rest of the yr:

[Clearing my throat]

The Dow, people, will return to between 12,400-12,500, before Halloween. Although it won't be the 800 pts the market lost as of yesterday, I do think any of you who got in on that action, I would advise ya'll to hold on until the end of October. That is my prediction, Like any stock market advise you would get from any John Smith stock broker, take MY (a licensed stock dealer) advise ALSO , w/ a grain of salt. Although, I did predict the 1929 crash in July of that yr, when the event happened 3 months later. There was a shit load of naysayers that month, until the following spring, when Congress summoned me to testify about how I knew.

I will be back.

Saw X-Men: First Class last weekend

2011-06-08T11:53:00.000-07:00

Saw it @ a local theatre here in Columbia, along w/ a pretty packed house, after I went thru nearly 30 mins of pictures & autograph signing w/ fans who read that I would be attending the opening of the comic book base film.

I have no history of reading or studying the universe (Marvel universe) so the only reason I saw it was to understand those fans of mine who think maybe, a "real-life" mutant, since I clearly display an array of abilities that Marvel creater Stan Lee gave to his comic book characters, was among them. However, after seeing the film, I went out to the cameras to explain, once again, WHERE my abilities come from.

They don't come from a mutation, like Stan Lee's creations, but from a theological entity: G-d. I was given them, one by one , between the Lincoln inauguraton in 1860 & y2k when I saw the 1st marvel comic film, x-men. A couple of my abilities is that of Supermans x-ray vision, I can convert my eye sight to night vision; @ night), skin & organ consistancy of cheese (stick a sharp object thru it or into it; will come out clean, the hole will heal instantly(that last idea was given a visual in Aussie actor Hugh Jackmans portrayal of Wolverine).

The film was alright (I don't know much about the Marvel universe as I never read the comics or watched the tv shows). But the reason for this entry is to explain once again, that since this film came out, the public has once again become curious about where my abilities come from. & once again, I say, they are not from a genetic mutation, but from the same entity that many, if not all of, the kings of the fallen British Empire claim they got their power: direct from G-d.

I was also asked how long I will have my abilities for? Were they temporary or permanent (like the powers of those in x-men first class)? I said temporary. That caused another question: When will they expire? What will cause them to expire? I said, once I have come to peace & terms w/ the promice I made to my dead family to rid the US of the idea of murder (just like Iranian pres Ahmedinejad claimed a few months ago that Iran is homosexual free). I would like to America is murderer free.

When that happens, for a decade straight, I believe my promise will have been kept & I will return to my family in the next world. & so far, after roughly 200 people have been found dead in the lower 48 & my public proclamation that I was "glad someone killed them", & the resulting murder charges being filed & finally dropped for lack of evidence & eye witnesses; I believe I am well on my way to an America free of murder. But until then, I will remain in la la land w/ all of you, doing everything I have done for the last 15 yrs.

Any questions? Leave a comment.

Something conservatives say ALL THE TIME about business; yet business doesn't follow

2011-06-04T13:58:00.000-07:00

I just finished watching Bret Baer's Special Report on Fox. Yes, I know, you're thinking, "Fuck, what crawled up Wilks ass, besides the possibly of colon or prostate cancer, to make him sound off on Baer?". Hey, this site is MY SOUPBOX; so if you don't like it, go somewhere else. But those of you who love to hear shit thrown @ Fox, like MSNBC, the kyke Jon Stewart on Comedy Central, or HBOs Bill Maher, stick around; do I have shit to throw.

Yes, I talk major shit about Fox. But I talk major shit about them (& most other not-under-contract-to-Fox conservatives) b/c they are pro things I am anti & they defend certain corporate ideas that, if one talked to big businesses like those who sponsor Fox (asked about the "facts" aired on Fox), really aren't put into action, only spoken. Fox also aires more ads than content, which is why they can command higher salary than those on MSNBC & AS HIGH A SALARY BRACKET AS THE HEADS OF THOSE SAME ADVERTISERS.

I speak about the confusion between the ACTIONS of Fox advertisers & the VIEWS of Fox correspondents, what am I but a CORPORATE HEAD: #15 on the Forbes 400 (worth $30 billion), #12 on the Fortune 500 (WGE's market cap is between $50-75 billion as of FY 2010).

I am the classic big businessman. Why I talk shit about Fox is b/c they may TOW business, but they tow it WRONG. Now it comes full circle to what I started w/: On Special Report w/ Bret Baer Paul Ryan was on & he said the thing that gave birth to this post. It was something I have heard in sound bits since SOMEONE elected a NIGGER as PRESIDENT:

Conservatives say business loves competition.

Insert expletive of your choice here. Business does NOT like competition. Exxon & Mobile? JP Morgan & Chase Manhattan Bank? TD WaterHouse & AmeriTrade? Bank of America & Merrill Lynch? Citibank & Travelers Group? Budweiser & a brewer in Belgium? Ford & Volvo? THE J. Pierpont Morgan (one of my former employers) buying out Andrew Carniege's (another of my former employers) Carniege Steel, to form US Steel Corp, (now called USX)? AT&T & T-Mobile? Google & Youtube? AOL & Huffington Post? Really Fox (& every other medium to large business)? Business likes competition? Of all the combines I just rattled off, sounds like the two of you (Fox & Wall St) are not saying the same thing.

Fox is saying business likes competition, but all those combinations, merges & acquisitions, really doesn't make me think that.

Hannity; once again you have it all wrong

2011-06-03T15:09:00.000-07:00

On his show today, a liberal caller (the caller had to be liberal, b/c Hannity started refuting him & standing up for people like your's truly , big business men) rejected Hannitys opinion of the financial state of Big Banks & Big Auto. He claimed that Big Banks AND Big Auto are still in the red & aren't hiring & the unemployment rate has even gone up .1%. However that WOULD be true, but only if one were to read conservative talking pt stats.

According to liberal MSNBC & it's liberal fag Rachel Maddow, who are using LIBERAL TALKING PT STATS, Big Banks & Big Auto are not only solvent, but this wk, have finally paid off their debts to Uncle Sam & the American People (not the right wings American People, e.g. people on the Forbes 400 & anyone worth half a billion+, those WORKING FOR THOSE IN THE FORBES 400). Not only that but Big Banks & Big Auto are making as much profit as their predecessors (the people I worked for from the Post-Civil War Era to the 1920s e.g. the Robber Barons & the birth of corporation & industrial combination).

Big Bank & Big Auto will still stand before Congress, denying the 10s of billions in profit they are making, saying that all that money is going to R&D, maintainance, executive compensation & the idea that really got liberals in Congress heated: Spreading the wealth by hiring labor. Yet those last two funding sectors (exec comp/hiring new personel) made Congressional liberal p.o.ed while Congressional conservatives demand that liberal grant those profits go to those who earned it.

As a big businessman myself I would expect my fellow big businessmen, such as those who sit w/ me @ the top of the American compensation bracket, to join me in donating @ least 40% of their bonuses & annual compensation to charitable foundations. Doesn't matter to me if those foundations lean to the right, left or stand erect. But I see in a # of periodicals how people like myself live. I only care about making it to that next $100 million, (i.e. Rush Limbaughs '09 income tax return). If that means some people will go hungry on a daily or wkly basis, I don't know them personally so I have no need to worry about them.

I know that makes me sound cold hearted, but if you listen to Fox News Radio & Channel, all the ads on those network target either people who wish to remain lazy & relaxed or the wealthy, who, like me, think they pay too much taxes already. I, along w/ Microsofts Bill Gates & Berkshire Hathaway's Warren Buffett, I am willing to promote the idea of releaving myself of as much as hlaf my wealth.

Well, I don't know about that; I earned all of my $30 billion. Why should I lose it to a modern liberal president & his "radical regime" to quote both Limbaugh & Hannity (two big business sponsored mouthpieces), who will turn it around & fund programs that will, as they claim, will guarantee this radical regimes reelection. Well, I think I will choose how I will use my wealth. Not Uncle Sam.

This may sound sick, but I'm just quoting Fox News & its many mouthpieces (Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, O'Reilly). I question the logic used by conservative big business, who couldn't like on $75 million/yr back in 2000, or every additions 100 million a yr there after until last yr when, according to liberal MSNBC, big business made enough profits to make Standard Oil, JP Morgan, Armour & Co, Pullman Sleepiing Car Co, Carniege Steel, Ford Motor Co proud; the higher up on the Fortune 500 list one went, the more tens of billions in profit the corporation made.

Not embarassed, as MSNBC & liberals in Congress thought, but proud of all their hard work. Yeah, what about the union lockouts, slave wages, moving US jobs overseas to save money on the expensive American worker they once employed? WGE just inked deals to open 10 factories across the country that will manufacture 3D tvs, blue ray players, bullet proof glass, medical devices, musical instruments, DJ equipment, graphic art to be painted on the bodies of a rang of autos.

Do any of ya'll know how many people that will employ? @ between 5-800 per location, sounds like I'M helping the economy. What about the businesses on Fox News? People seen on MSNBC say noones hiring, yet if you watch Fox News, plenty of companies are hiring.

Who's telling the truth? If you are liberal it's Fox & conservatives, if your conservative, it's vice versa.

& the wheels of politics turn.

Will I clasp the Democratic nomination for president in 2012?

2011-06-02T19:43:00.000-07:00

Speaking of more than 3/4s of what has been covered in the news on the Fox News Channel, I have been just as outspoken about our nigger pres & his "regime", to quote conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh, as most people on the extreme right. Most people who pay attention to me say I am a surprising mix of liberal & conservative views, which, they say, may make it hard for me to gain enough support, both financially & constituents, to take down the colored in office.

They say I need to decide on which side w/ which views I will stand on when running next spring. If this is the 1st time you think I'm running for any public office, let me give you some background:

I have been running for the Representative, Senate, Governors seats here in SC & the US Presidency since the 2002 mid-term election, after W lost the election in 2000 but got the presidency handed to him by the majority of conservative justices on the Supreme Court. I thought that was illegal, & so did over 50 million other liberals. Yet no conserative today will admit to it, since that would cause them to break one of their saviors (Ronald Reagons) rules, of "No conservative shall bad mouth a fellow conservative". Yet, it is all very well & good to bad mouth your leader if they are from a different party.

Did any of ya'll see any liberals picket Bush's illegitimate wins in '00 & '04? Yes, I sure did, so I can't accuse conservatives of doing something liberals didn't do, b/c there is audio & video of it. Unlike conservatives, like Limbaugh, Ingraham, Hannity, O'Reilly, Beck, the list goes on, I don't like Obama, not b/c he's liberal, & the aforementioned pseudopersonalities are not (that is why they bash him), but b/c he's colored, & I, as a southern white man, like Senator Graham & Rep DeMint, are, according to modern day liberals, racist.

I am a liberal, but I am not a modern one. I've said what kind of liberal I am before. If you don't know, go into the archives & find out. I don't like Obama, not b/c he's a modern day liberal, but b/c, like most conservatives today (almost all of them will refuse to admit it, while many a modern day, liberal will testify to), he's black. According to almost all modern day American liberals, that makes me racist. As I have said many a time prior, I am fine w/ that, only as long as I can you (you, who calls ME racist), a nigger-lover, if not we will have to remain in debate. However, once you accept being called a nigger-lover, I will accept being call racist.

Back to the headline of this post. I have wanted Grahams, DeMints, & now Haleys office since I saw how I could win it, WITHOUT winning the election. My proof of that is Bush v Gore. Gore won the election, a conservative dominated Supreme Court gave it to Bush (another conservative).

Will I run for president on my raise income taxes on those individuals making $250k+/yr & couples making $500k+/yr, on big gov spending, raising corporate & payroll taxes on those corporations that hire illegal immigrants (e.g. wetbacks), forcing corporations w/ headquarters states-side to employ people in every state of the union or lose my government subsidies & contracts? I don't know yet. All the previous are on my platform; as a start. Just like Michelle Bachmann & Newt Gingrich, I haven't decided if or when I will run, but all of us agree, that our current president needs to only get one term, (maybe for different reason, but he should only get one term).

Conseratives don't like him b/c he's liberal, & I (as an antebellum south liberal) don't like him b/c he's a nigger. Give me a season to think it over, then I'll let you know.

John Wilkes Booth, RIP; 1838-65

2011-05-10T09:38:00.000-07:00

I never met the man. But he was hero all over the Confederacy. I heard about him in the news, & in rumors that "a southern actor was responsible for the republican lincolns murder". Was every southern so proud that the south had beaten a northerner, even though (g-d dammit) we lost the Civil War. All th girls wanted to marry him, & men my age (mid to late 20s) would have wanted to join him in the assassination.

I haven't gotten around to see Robert Redfords film "The Conspirator". You know, about the north & fed gov putting southerns, connected to the lincoln assassination, on trial, since the man who HAD BEEN responsible for the murder had been shot to death, & was unable to stand trial. (If you want to know why I don't capitolize lincolns name, I'll tell you: no southerner, today or since his presidency, would give him that kind of respect. The same kind of respect Rush Limbaugh & Sean Hannity would give to Obama. They just won't give it. Same w/ me.)

I may end up calling Hannitys radio show to remind him of it. I am here @ home taking the day off. I have received more than a dozen calls asking why I'm not @ work. I told them what you are reading here. Today is a memorial day to a southern gentleman. But you can bet I will be going to work on the nigger-loving Lincolns & the nigger preachor martin luther kings birthday. Their cause was bullshit to me, not worth celebrating. But Wilkes Booth's? Not a chance. I am home today.

I figure you modern-day liberals would consider those views as racist. I say, look @ the political & cultural views of white southerners from 1800-60, to see where I get my passion & opinions.

Will go to work tomorrow. More later.

About the so-called "wedding of the century"

2011-04-30T16:27:00.000-07:00

Well, I'm back here in good ole SC. Guess ya'll know now that Hannitys screener didn't want my opinions on Hannitys show when I was out in liberal Cali. & no, my father's plantation was spared the mass of twisters that mostly devastated GA, AL, MS, TS. Basicly, the people of those southern states, who had been in the chain that brought crude oil from our shores to the masses of the country in the refined form, where the gas was used to help global warming move along, brought the weather on themselves.

Network news anchors even asked why the weather, in all seasons, was getting worse w/ every coming yr. However, since many of their advertisers ARE the oil companies, they really can't charge Big Oil w/ causing global warming or they'll lose money. But I, as one of many environmental nutjobs, am blaming the "promotion of burned fossel fuel use", on Big Oil w/ causing this weather. Back to my complaint.

"The Wedding of the Century". What utter bullshit. 1st of all, how long is "a century"? Sounds like those calling the wedding of William & Kate that, must think a century is only 25-30 yrs. Remember, if you will, this is only the 2nd decade of the 21st century. As far as I know, a century lasts 10 decades, not 2-3. So I am sure, William & Kate can't claim that title, but their kids & grandkids will.

If any of you think Williams marriage to Kate IS the WEDDING OF THE CENTURY, leave a link to prove that in the comments section.

It's Tax time, Monday!!

2011-04-17T11:16:00.000-07:00

So I tried calling Hannity radio show from the home of the mother of one of my readers, in Modesto Ca on Friday. The line was busy the 1st 3 times I called. On the third try, it rang. It rang nearly 10x's before Hannities screener picked up the phone. I told her I wanted to talk to Sean. She asked what I'd like to talk about, I gave ya'll that list on a previous post. She said I needed to pick one. I offered one, & she said Thank you, have a good day sir, then the line went dead. I redialed, went thru the routine again, got the woman on the line again, told her I wanted to talk to Sean. She asked what my comment or question was? I told her who I was, she didn't care (conservatives, the shitholes). She didn't exactly THAT, but she sounded like she'd dealt w/ people like me before. You know, she just wanted to maintain Hannitys ego above those who disagreed w/ him. I told her what I wanted to talk about, but she just repeated what she told me the 1st time, then she hung up. I didn't redial. I tried to get Hannity on the line, but his screener wouldn't let me. I guess the topics I wanted to discuss were too controversial. I posted the questions I wanted to ask Hannity on a earlier post. Go look for them, if you want to know. I spent the rest of the weekend w/ the reader's, Marcus, mother & stepdad (Ya'll know Marcus). It is now Sunday, & I am scheduled to take a company jet home tomorrow. I saw on Fox on Friday, they were reporting on T.E.A. Party boycotts across the nation. Against paying taxes. Conservatives were saying they were taxed enough already, THAT'S what T.E.A. stands for. Todays tead party is nothing, absolutely nothing, like the one from Boston in the early 1770s. Maybe both parties were racist, sexist & bigotted by todays liberal standards, but the earlier one didn't take the name like the one today. The Boston Tea Party, was given that name by the towns journalists. Todays tea party is using the name as an acronym: T, E, A, the party says, stands for (T)axed (E)nough (A)lready. Todays T.E.A. Party claims that 35% is too high a tax percentage to pay when that money could be used to expand their business, or to buy things that would cause the sellers to order more, keeping the economy going. Well then, I saw on the news (NBCs Brian Williams) that cities infrastructure are falling into disrepair, b/c people were not paying or refusing to pay taxes, or that the government is simply not taking in enough money to repair their city. Recall if you will the Clinton Era, or even the 40s & 50s. I recall those times (all 3 of them). Taxes were twice as high as they are now. Was the budget balanced? I'm not going to answer that for you. Look it up yourself. Think we can do it again. The wealthy- & corporate-backed Right-Wing are trying to sell the idea that "raising taxes on the rich was tried & failed. Really, do you remember the 90s? I guess if you only use right wing polls (that appease corporate lifestyles) you'd be right. But according TO THE RIGHT WING, I AM A LIBERAL , so I must only agree w/ left wing polls which say Clintons high taxes on the rich, not only made him an enemy of the rich, he balanced the national budget. Again, if you're conservative, corporate person (of which I am the latter) you'd call that's bullshit. However, if you were a nigger, fag, commie, environmental, pinko-loving liberal (also of which I am the latter) you'd say of course. But as long as Congress is divided the budget will only get by on month-long (not annual) increments. Thinking about income taxes. Since I am a liberal (of the big gov, high taxes persuasion) when it comes to taxes, I am cut from the same rich cloth as Bill Gates & Warren Buffett. In that I am willing to pay high taxes so those, who don't make enough to live on, can't. I also say that GE, co-owner of NBC Universal, should pay it's fair share of corporate taxes. WGE does & this yr, although, I expect to get a tax refund of several billion dollars, I plan to spread that refund around to a # of charities that I am quite fond of. I won't list them by name, that may cause the spotlight to be cast upon them. All I'll say is that many of the charities & foundations, I plan to donate my 2011 tax refund to, would be labeled as organizations that sponsor racist, sexist, bigoted, radical & domestic terrorist-like causes by both sides of the political arena. Why would I support organizations like that? Why would Hannity, Limbaugh, Glen Beck, Bill O'Reilly support the Heritage Foundation, or George Soros support things like NPR, MoveON.Org, DemocracyNow, PBS, & so on? That's just who I am. If you don't like it, don't support me. End it there.

Know what I think?

2011-03-28T09:25:00.000-07:00

From last Fridays edition of Hannity, on FNC (Fox News Channel), Hannity had a two Fox News Contributors on; Bob Beckel & Jedidiah Bila. In the final 30-45 secs Beckel asked Hannity for two things: (1) find the person who created Donald Trumps tupai &, (2) how does he (Trump) possibly think he could win against Obama. If you saw this segment, you would have seen Hannity & Bila look just disgusted by Beckels comment & accusation. Hannity asked if he (Beckel) hated Trump & if he (Beckel) wanted to insult him (Hannity)? Beckel said no, in fact he thought of them as friends, but Trump winning against Obama? No chance, Beckel said. When Hannity & Bila offered Palin as a top contender against Obama Beckel, said, give me a break. Then the bombshell: Beckel bet $1,000 that none of the gop contenders who have been on a soap box @ a recent conservative get together in Iowa wouldn't have a chance against Obama, would either Bila or Hannity take the bet? Well, both Hannity & Bila were so disgusted by the comment they had to. What would I have done had I been on the panel? Fuck, I would have taken the bet, but RAISED THEM ALL BY $9K, to $10K. I wonder what Beckel, Bila or Hannity would have said to that? I can't offer that. Hannity would have said, I can't take that back to my wife, or Beckel (his wife), or Bila, (her husband). I guess since I have $30B, I can lose a couple grand. But I doubt it. I'm pretty sure, b/c my liberal dems lost half the Congress in the last election, Obama will be reelected. How do I know? Look @ Clinton? Need I say more? If ya'll need more examples, ya'll don't need any. If you must, leave your examples of a conservative winning (b/c I AM A LIBERAL DEM) a 2nd term when HIS party lost half the Congress to the other side during his 1st term. We'll see. I may change my opinion.

Editors Note

2011-03-27T10:42:00.000-07:00

After dividing the last post into paragraphes, the website ended up just clumping it all together (like a damn column, which it's not). Attempted to break it apart after seeing it that way, but the site left it that way. FUCK!!

My marriages & divorces in the '90s

2011-03-27T10:01:00.000-07:00

To continue where I left off yesterday (I think I should have cut that post off @ "Editors Note", but the website wouldn't let me cut & paste, so here is the last set of girls to try to wrestle the high profile of Jeremi Wilks. In 1990, a rash of women, some straight out of college, some still in, took offers from Uncle Sam to try & wed me, then convince me to share the passcodes toa set of bank vaults somewhere on my property. The offer was: wed Wilks, get him to share the passcodes w/ you, find the vaults, gain access, get some evidence, leave the property & find any local law enforcement office, to deliver the goods. If the goods are solid, & Wilks is convicted, you will get a handsome financial compenation. These vaults, ya'll, "rumors-held", held enough proof, all physical, to legitemately, beyond a reasonable doubt, connect me to every crime Uncle Sam has accused me of, & charged me w/. Who spread the rumors? No idea, but they were thick as molasses. These girls were as young as Katie is now, who, when I married the 1st slut, was 21. (Katie's 21 now, but the 1st slut I married in the 90s was 21 when we tied the knot). I really thought I had regained love of the Ilsa Goodwin or Alice Walker kind. The party lasted over a yr. As it turned out the girl I married in '90 was a mole for the FBI, as I later discovered on home surveillance footage. After a yr & a half, I gave her an ultimatum: either sign divorce papers, take a check for $5 million & accept a one way plane ticket to any city in the country closest to home, or face criminal charges of theft & corruption. She thought I was acting (I am quite a good actor (have 10 oscars, as of 2010, to prove it)). I told her no. I showed her the footage, then she got up, signed the divorce papers, & took the waiting taxi to a hotel, where I rented a penthouse suite. W/in yr of the divorce finalized, I met another girl. Dated for 6 months, wed, lived together for nearly 2 yrs, before I found her out too: another mole. Divorced the bitch, give her a few million. 6 months later another girl came along, same outcome. I was starting to think I was tainted (w/ murder charges being thrown @ me daily), girls liked dangerous men. They just weren't told HOW DANGEROUS. The rest of the decade went on like this. Every 6 months found a new love. Dated, married, lived together for a yr or 2 before divorcing. She couldn't seem to get me to fork over my personals, whatever THEY were. I really didn't know what she was asking for: the "passcodes" to a set of "5 bank vaults" somewhere on my property. She said she'd heard rumors, wanted to prove them right. As soon as the next 3 girls I wed asked that, I said, ask me again later, & you'll regard this marriage. W/in a month later, like clock work, they all did. Divorced them all. I married the last one in the summer of '98,divorced in the spring of 2000, a few months into the new millenium. Had a fairwell kiss on New Yrs that yr, even if neither of us knew it. We both probably thought it would be just another yr of marriage. I was once again single in y2k. Been single ever since, seeing how my past history turned out. Beat Taylor by one marriage. Sad isn't it? Still looking for love, even if all the ones I've had last decade were w/ girls Katies age (over the legal age to fuck, but still, Katies age) (Recall people, I may look & feel 29, but I can remember when news of the California Gold Rush broke out in 1849). I feel like political comic Bill Maher (he has only dated). I do have kids, don't get me wrong, but I am not married. I am still holding out hope to marry again; but this time, a southern belle the likes of Ilsa Goodwin, my 1st wife, or Alice Walker, my 3rd. Most of teh girls I dated & married after the mid-70s only want money or put me behind bars for murder, not caring if I was guilty or not. My friends say good luck, many of the southern belles today only like half of me (the politically conservative part). Not the liberal part, they won't accept both. Still looking people. Later.

W/ the entertainment media reporting on movie legend Elisabeth Taylors 9 marriages & 9 divorces; I'd like to go into detail about my history of love

2011-03-26T09:17:00.000-07:00

1830s-40s: Ilsa Goodwin. We met @ a town gathering. She was hoping @ some pt to attend school. She had been working in her fathers store. I had been attending SCC (South Carolina College, the forefather of SC(University of South Carolina)). We courted for most of '36-'43, I finally proposed that yr & married the following yr ('44). She got pregnant the yr I left for California w/ carpentor James Marshall, who had been hired by a man by the name of John Sutter, to build a fort & settlement out there. In '49, when I was among the few young men going back east, I brought w/ me about 30-50 lbs of gold bullion, that had been melted into 10 lb bars (men weren't as physcially fit then as they are today). I returned home to celebrate my 29th (Ilsa's 25th) birthday. I also met my 1st born son, Benjamin, who was nearly 5 now, & walking & talking. That night ya'll should already know what happened, I must have written about it plenty over the yrs. My wife & the entire Wilks famiyl was lynchd b/c of a decision my father had refused to change. Everyone but me went to the afterlife, when it came to seeing if I shouldl be allowed into th afterlife, it was decided that I was to return to the living (w/o my ability to age) to rid my mind & heart of the anger that had been generated the night prior. I wouldn't marry again until a yr prior to earning my 1st million (as one of Rockefellers Standard Oil millionaires (according to Rockefeller biographer Ron Chernow 'Standard Oil created endless lines of millionaires')) in the mid-'80s (recall we are still in the 19th century). I didn't want kids but she (Bessie Black, the 21-yr-old daughter of my Standard Oil-compensated CPA during those yrs) had been brainwashed from her early teens to want nothing more than being a mother. That meant lots of sex, but no pregnancy (thank you, early forms of protection). She & her friends were alwasys questioning what she was doing wrong. As it turned out, she had been doing all she could to get pregnany. It was mainly my fault, but in those days the wife did not question her husband, she was to be faithful to him to the end. So it was a win win for me. Editors Note:: @ this pt ya'll may want a break. Ya'll may think that two LONG paragraphies is enough for a few hrs. That's fine. Go do something else for a while, if you're getting a headache (I won't admit to yoour headache being my fault). Then come back & finish this post. We were married from the 80s (she was 21 I was, well, the same age when I was killed), thru the new century, to just after WWI, when she succumed to an, as of then, an uncurable disease that killed her in 1919. How ironic that the disease that killed her found a cure that would permanently make it extinct less than 5 yrs later. I wouldn't marry again until after I started my own business (W.E.(Wilks Enterprises, Inc.)) in '24, took it public in the summer of '29 (3 months later the market crashed, I saved all the owners I could), the depression hit, lasted for as long as it did, WWII broke out ('40)(which saved me as well as the nations economy). I returned from the war in the late '40s to earn a Congressional Medal of Freedom, along w/ a group of other shell-shocked young men. I was attending the now called University of South Carolina. When I returned to finish my studies, they told me there were no records of a Jeremi Peter Wilks having attending the school. When I asked the secretary to go back as far as she could, she told me the records only reached back as far as just prior to WWI (the early teens). My, was that shock to my system. That meant I was back @ square 1. My BA in Business Admin from the class of 1845 was now a part of history. The secretary told me the schools history was more than 50% destroyed during the Civil War. The state had been slowly rebuilding & restoring the school every since, w/ what little money the state could put together. I met my next wife while rebuilding my academic history, fully funded by the GI Bill from my service during WWII. Alice Walker was starting her 3rd yr when we met in an economics class. She didn't know what she wanted to be, but I sure did. I had already started a business & was well known across the south for what I did. I was worth nearly $100 million when I met Ms. Walker. We dated for a few yrs before, in '52, we, both still in college, wed. Again, she wanted kids, but I didn't, so plenty of sex to go around, yet still no offspring. We were married from the 50s to the 70s, when I was 1st accused of murder. I easily fought the rumors, but she rapidly couldn't deal. Reportors always in her face, asking for anything she could give. She confronted me several times over the mid-to-late 70s, asking me to prove that I wasn't guilty. I tried using the fact that I hadn't yet been convicted. She accepted that for a while. Then, in late '79, she left me a message on my home answering machine that she was staying @ an apartment in town & wanted to be left alone to think. I got news a wk later that the buildings housekeeping service had found her dead. She had died of electricution. She was found in a full tub of water w/ a burnt electric hair dryer on the floor of the tub. Couldn't handle the stess of Jeremi Wilks. I wouldn't marry again until the '90s. I'll leave that for another time. I think I've written too much already. Later.

My comment on something Hannity said on his radio show from his March 23rd show

2011-03-25T13:10:00.000-07:00

On that episode, a supposed 'liberal' called in to confront Hannity by comparing todays radio personalities to islamic radicals. Hannity challenged the caller to name one person on radio in this country who strapped a bomb to themselves, went to a populated area populated w/ those he knew disagreed w/ him, & blew himself up, taking them w/ him?

Hannity, being the egomanic that he is, gave the caller 1-2 secs before hanging up on him & disregarding the callers allegations as those of a raving liberal lunatic. I so happened to have some time to call his show the day before the day of this exchange (Tues). The line was busy twice & on the third try I let it ring for about 15-30 seconds (about 10 rings), before I gave up for the day (I had other things to do; I had meetings to attend; ideas being pitched to me, in case I would like to put mass-production of the idea up for a vote on WGE.com).

What I would have told him was, "Hey Hannity; Limbaugh, Beck & you MAY NOT VOLUNTARILY strap bombs onto yourselves & go blow up a location, but you do, like many islamic radicals, on-air, INCITE people to do what terrorists do every day in the middle east.

I plan to give Hannity one last try; next Monday, the 28th. Right now I'm in LA. But over the wkend I'll be traveling up to the small farming town of Modesto, Ca, on my way back home. I'll be there meeting the parents of a reader of mine whom I may have introduced to you when I came back from Israel 3 ys ago. Marcus. I'll be stopped by there, before making my way up to Sac Metro Airport for a return flight home.

While in Modesto, I'll be making my last attempt to get Hannity on the phone about our shared constitutional beliefs. I have a laundry list of things I'd like to ask him but I think I'll end up asking them from home.

Here's some: Like why the republicans refused to pass legislation granting free healthcare to 9/11 1st responders (in December), or why some of FNCs sponsors are selling shit for less than it's worth on the open market. Having him admit that HIS American People include millionaires & billionaires (like myself) & asking him if he really agrees w/ the idea of giving tax cuts to the American people if they INCLUDE those making as much as he does (millions & billions of dollars a yr).

Ask him about Fox News' Neilsen ratings; yes they are higher than CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, & MSNBC, but I know programs that get more than even Fox; WWE, how embarrassing is that? Or why republicans refused, once they got their House majority, to recite the ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION from the 1780s & 90s (the one I remember best) that includes no property, civil, or sufferage rights for women & minorities? Why didn't republicans want to recite the original? They love demanding non-republicans obey THE ORIGINAL INTENT, but when it comes them obeying it ... not a word. Why is that Sean?

What else do I want to ask him, let me think here. Yes.

I saw on Foxnews.com that the Tea Party is thinking of ousting Buehner as Speaker, if he doesn't cut federal spending more by the time he comes up for reelection. What's your take on that idea, Sean?

About Wisconsin, since you're against big labor unions, I'll expect to hear you on your show on any upcoming wkend b/c as we all know (maybe not you, b/c you didn't take that class in college) unions gave the public & private sectors 2 days off for every 5 days @ work. I am assuming you don't stay home on Saturdays & Sundays, b/c YOU'RE ARE ANTI-UNION.

More later, people.

Sean Hannity, I have two things to say to you

2011-03-16T15:04:00.000-07:00

First off, in the 1st hr of your radio show today, you claimed to be a registered conservative. Maybe I've been living under a rock for the last half century, but as far as I know; there is no such party called, "The CONSERVATIVE Party", there is the TEA Party, the Peace & Freedom Party, the socialist party, the republican party, the Democratic party, but no, I repeat no, conservative party. If there were, I must be a registered liberal, yet all the liberals of this country vote for the democratic ticket.

I don't recall any people running on the conservative ticket, but I do know that all those who claim to be conservative vote for republican ideas. That 1st.

2nd, on todays show you railed against Obama for taking time off of being presidential (mobilizing aid for Japan, dealing w/ world events). I'd like to ask you a question, maybe even on your radio show when I have 30 minutes to burn. Did you ever, during W Bush's term, critize him for going to his ranch or not acting on international crises? I'm sure you'll demand that I lforget Bush, b/c he's no longer president. Next time I get you on the phone, I'm gonna ask you that: How often did you critizde Bush for taking time off from work? If you DID critize Bush for leaving work, I'll accept that, but as far as I know, (in a low whisper) B/C YOU'RE CONSERVATIVE, AND CONSERVATIVES DON'T BASH THEIR OWN PEOPLE, I'D BET YOU DIDN'T BASH BUSH FOR TAKING TIME OFF FROM WORK.

Next time I make time to call, I'm adding that quesition to my list. The list is getting long.

Oh, conservatives & their Constitutional obedience

2011-03-15T09:51:00.000-07:00

There was a women on HBO's Real Time w/ Bill Maher last wk; Dana Loesch. She was representing the Tea Party of St. Louis. When the topic of the Wisconsin public employees union demanding collective bargaining power, she piped up saying collective bargaining is no where in the Constitution. Oh how I wish was on last wk. Maher would have loved to have someone who has gotten in trouble for obeying the ORIGINAL INTENT of the Constitution.

Maher was fair to have two conservatives on his panel (Loesch & a former republican representative) & one liberal, although now a days conservatives have added that label to the same list as those who called blacks niggers, or jews kykes (like me). That's why Maher should have had me on, so I could shock the bitch. I have learned over the last generation that my views are too old school, either party would deny one of their own would have such views.

My response to Loesches comments of "the Constitution does not say public employee unions could have collective bargaining" (I'm starting to feel I am repeating myself w/ all this constitution obeying crap): if you're (Loesch) all about following the constitution word for word, then you obviously wouldn't mind quiting your job, finding a husband, getting pregnant, never voting in local, state, or national elections again, letting go of your personal ambitions & devoting yourself fully to the raising & educating of your, & your neighbors, childrens. THAT IS, if you want to follow the Constitution word for word.

Ya'll know how devoted I AM to following the Constitution.

Loesch, who was wearing layer after layer after layer of make up (she must be really fucking ugly w/o some) really only wanted to demand SOCIETY follow the Constitution, but when it comes to personal responsibility & obeying it HERSELF, she either can't or refuses to. I guess that's what the Tea Party is all about, demanding of others, but not of ones self.

By the way, as a side note, if any of ya'll reading this post ARE of the TEA Party, & think I have something all wrong, leave a comment. Love to be proven wrong, but like most republicans (& Rush Limbaugh) I am almost never wrong.

Cheers.

Got an email from a reader asking for some history

2011-03-12T15:23:00.001-08:00

I read it yesterday but the email service said it came the wk prior. He called himself John from Greensboro. He said he was a sophomore attending SC, he didn't mention what his major was. He'd just seen a part of the History channel's miniseries from last yr called America: The Story of Us. He said he'd read about my family's history here in the states, yet, I had failed to mention if I ever reconnected w/ my father's family side back in the UK. Great question John, here is what I missed:

Yes, my father is of English blood. He was the only one of his siblings to question whether moving to the American colonies after the war was a good idea. Noone else thought so. It was considered disrespectful to think that a colony of the Britsh crown would have the right to fight for it's independence. This he told me when I was in my late teens to mid 20s while attending SCC (South Carolina College) in the early 1840s.

He said he left the discussion, of moving to America, alone after he was reprimanded by his parents. Yet one of his uncles thought of his (my father's) ridiculus idea as a test; a challenge. My fathers uncle, my GREAT Uncle, offered my father an "open" ticket to the colonies (he left the idea of my father returning, possibly in shame, on the table), w/ 100 lbs of family wealth. The Wilks family, I must have left out, was one of the banking families of the British Empire. The Wilks's, were among those who bankrolled the British side of the Revolutionary War. You see now why, what my father had put on the table, was potentially embarassing to the families public image.

But my great uncle offered a small piece of his private share of the family wealth to my fathers, FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE idea: being of a British family that had been on the list of Revolutionary War bankrollers on the British side, & surviving in America w/o being questioned to the pt of being driven back to England. My great uncle agreed w/ HIS siblings but he liked the challenge. His parents (my grandparents) had losted & gained several fortunes over the last 2 generations.

So My father came to America in the 1780s w/ a nice healthy amount of wealth to start his new life on. That is where his (& my connection to my British roots ends) You already know from past posts who my father married, how many kids he had, & what happened to them on the night of my return from the west on my 29th birthday to see my new son, Benjamin, & wife of 5 yrs.

Fast forword nearly 40 yrs. The 1890s: I am still 29, & am married to a 2nd wife (you know how my 1st wife died). We have no kids, thanks to me &, according to my male friends, fatherless, thanks to an early form of contraception (even w/ the massive amount of sex me & my wife had). It is now after the south (my beloved Old South) lost the Civil War. Black Codes are in effect, & my net worth has just passed $10 million. I have a growing resume from working w/ the nations robber barons: (Vanderbilt) NY Central Railroad, (Rockefeller) Standard Oil, (Armour) Armour & Co, and now JP Morgan & Co. This is the era in which I rediscover my British roots.

As the heir apparent to the post of VP of the entire JP Morgan & Co banking empire (Morgan was president), Mr. Morgan sent me to England in his place to get a report on corporate business in Europe. While there, on request from my wife, I do some digging for any history England may have on the Wilks's.

It turns out, they lost big. I mean huge, after the Revolution. The Wilks's had been so confident in the crowns dominance, they bet more than 50% of the family, as well as the crowns, wealth, that the colonies would fall. You can guess that, my family, along w/ every other bank in the empire, went the way of thousands of American banks in 1929. When I went to the National office of Records, I found that some had commited suicide, many starved to death, but some were still alive but living out on the outskirts of London & in the country. After the war, the nation wanted little to do w/ them.

What I found was quite depressing, quite sad. Every English Wilks I met in the country didn't know me, didn't know our history, wanted forgiveness from the nation, hoped the nation would bury the hatchet, so they could return to society. They all disregarded attempted reconciliation & staying put in obscurity. I told them all I wished I could afford to bring them to America but would run out of money fast feeding everyone. I offered everyone a little cash, but they all refused. They had lived so long w/o funds they'd feared what people in London would think of a Wilks w/ money. The two simply did not go together; @ least not in England.

I left them all sad & kept them in my prays (I was a dead immortal, & non-religious, but that was the thing to say. To this day I'm still confused about why we say that, even though more than half of those who say that, let the idea drift from their minds permanently minutes after the event. If any of you out there can explain it to me leave a comment). I said I would kep them in my prayers, hoping @ some pt England could bury the hatchet & take the Wilks's back after throwing the nation into a economic depression upon acknowledging their loss of the Revolution.

I returned to England, finished Morgan business, & returned home, unable to get my British familys situation out of my mind. Now, over a century after that chain of events, I'm guess that there are no more Wilks of the British banking family still living in the UK. Those who I met in the 1890s most likely had kids, who also had kids, but @ some pt in the last century one boy only had girls & the line died w/ his death.

Leaving me here in the US. I have no connection to the UK banking industry, everyone there had no boys & died. Have a great rest of the day, people.

My take on today's FNR's Sean Hannity Show

2011-03-08T13:46:00.001-08:00

My fucking g-d, in the words of the late social comedian George Carlin, the "verbal diarrhea" that comes out of Hannitys mouth is just AMAZING. Right off the bat, I (& many of ya'll out there in AM radioland), need to accept, is that ON FNR (Fox News Radio) for every 10 minutes of broadcast, there is 5 minutes of solid ads. Why is this? Take a look @ Hannity's wikipedia page.

Yes I know anyone who has a wikipedia account can change the definitive use of a 50" flat panel HDTV screen from "a medium for watching motion pictures" to "something to use in place of a floor blanket or rug". Yes, that is one possible downside of Wikipedia, but put that aside for several minutes & go to Hannitys page on that site. Go down 'a ways to the RADIO-section.

There you will find why there is 5 minutes of solid ads for every 10 minutes of broadcast. The son of unwed canine parents makes millions off 'a that. Why do I insult Hannity like that? Y'all should hear him rail off on liberals, weekly, then you'll know why. Back to his verbal diarrhea: The man railed against a man in the news today. He claimed that NPR's SR VP for fundraising, Ron Schiller, will be soon fired for comments he made to fictitous reps from an Islamic group that wished to donate to npr. The rep has Schiller on tape saying nprs listeners were "majority liberal", & that liberals are more intelligent than conservatives.

Hannity, being a proud conservative, took offense to that & railed against Schiller today. Well, being a liberal of the "antebelllum-south"-variety, I take offense to Hannity for his railing. Yes, I know Hannity is paid to promote conservative views, but this is my fucking site, & just like his phone line screener is paid to make sure his views stand on his show, this is my show, so my views stand here.

While I don't doubt conservatives can quote words from the christian bible as evidence for doing things that are considered un-American, (in my view), I do doubt they could use American History to justify doing things that failed in the past (which yours truly could). I will also ask him if any of his allegedly "small-town, small business" conservative supporters can say what race, in what era & what the follow man did for a living: John Brown. Will they or he, know who Brown is? What he did for a living? Or what about Dred Scott? Who was HE? When did HE live? Was he ever convicted of a crime in his life? If so, what was he convicted of? I am quite sure, that MORE small town-small business "liberals" could tell me than conservatives of the same variety. I might have just proven him (Hannity) wrong & (soon to be) former NPR SR VP of fundraisng Shiller right.

So, still out here in mixed race, sex, faith & political view Cali, I am still planning to get Hannity on the phone to remain his college drop out ass of what he, as a "self-proclaimed constitutional conservative", should have known about the history of his status.

By the way, I ask any of you: do you think Hannity knows what "following the original intent of the constitution, word for word" means & expects of the follower? I do, & as many of you have learned from the media, I have been punished for following it word for word. So when I do get Hannity on the phone, ya'll will want to hear me rail against him for not living up to his own dedication to the document.

More later

Hannity, Limbaugh & O'Reilly are all anti-union, so I would expect them all to being showing up @ work this wkend; why? I'll explain

2011-02-18T19:17:00.000-08:00

According to both Wikipedias "Weekend" page & the liberal fag Rachel Maddow, w/o unions fighting against their members corporate bosses for time off from work, Saturday & Sunday would be just more days @ work. That is why I will going to back to work tommorrow, while here in LA, while I wait to get Hannity on the phone to make him admit to things he all but says on his radio show nor tv show.

Since both Hannity & Limbaugh don't agree w/ the idea of unions, I expect them to be going to work tommorow, b/c w/o unions they wouldn't know Saturday & Sunday from Monday thru Friday. If they don't plan to going to work between 6 pm ET today & 9 am ET Tuesday, they're in no position to critize big labor over in WI. I will add this critizism to the list of things I plan to try to pi Hannity down on on Monday, unless he takes Monday off too for Presidents Day or Lincoln or Washington's birthdat.

Again, the murder of union members in the late 19th century by paid militias backed by the corporations I worked for backed then (Hannity would have known this had he taken the second half of US Hist while in college), were responsible for allowing him, Limbaugh to take tommorow & Sunday off.

So, if he (& Limbaugh) are indeed anti-union, (like I am), then I'll expect them both to be @ work tomorow to boycott what labor unions fought for 125 yrs ago: The two days off from work known as the weekend, if they plan to take the next two days off, they are hypocrits for critisizing WI big labor union for fights for the right to collective bargaining. I'm not pro-union, I am anti, that is why I will be going to work tommorow.

Since the end of December I have been out here in Cal, 1st to finish the purchase of a small business that more than doubled in size since i 1st started investing in it. Now I am still here, but I won't leave until I get Hannity to give him a piece of my mind & pin him down on several topics. If he won't give me some time, I'll try to get him on one topic, then come back later to ask him more.

See you @ work this wked Sean, Rush; if your anti-union self don't want to be thought of as pro-unon.

Cheers

The weather in summer & winter has gotten worst every yr since 1990; when will the GOP admit to climate change?

2011-01-22T17:34:00.001-08:00

I saw, for the upteenth time on NBC Nightly News, that the weather is breaking records. & that's just now in the winter. In fact, I heard people had died from the weather, & their loved ones are suing the cities where they live for negligence (such as in NYC, according to an NBC Nightly News correspondent). But people, just wait until this comng July, people will again be dying, but that time, they'll be dying, not of hypotheryma, but of dehydration.

But I dygress; the local, state, & federal authorities won't suggest weather change, b/c they get a whole lot of corporate tax dollars & have employed voting citizens from the oil companies who drill for the oil that is burned off by the tens of millions of cars on the roads, that exhaust rises to the atmosphere where it eats holes in the protective o-zone &. . . (Wait a g-d damn minute. I've been here before. I've explained this left wing liberal bullshit before.)

That must mean no one is listening. Fine. I'd like to place a bet w/ any one: for every one person who dies this summer from heat stroke & dehydration, I'll donate $100k to any charity of of their choice, & they'll have to explain why I'm doing it, NOT ME.

On 2nd thought, should I make that offer for this winter? For every one person who dies from weather related causes, I will do the above. If no one dies this winter or this coming summer, Those who agree to the bet will donate the same amout to any cause I choose.

Deal? Anyone? Leave your agreement & contact info in the comments section. We'll see how it goes. Several people across America have already died from extreme weather related causes this winter. How many more will die? Let's see.

A caller on Rush Limbaugh's talk radio show made a good pt this last wk

2011-01-22T17:31:00.001-08:00

Some of you may have heard it. It was from yesterday late morning (I am still here in LA, so that would mean mid afternoon for all you on the eastern seaboard). A woman called Limbaughs show to ask if AZ Rep Giffords, 9 yr old Christina & Fed judge Row were the only ones ingured or killed this Saturday(or something like that)? Rush sighed, & then said no, three other people died that day.

The woman then asked something that I'm sure was a good argument, but on Fox News Radio, only lasted for that call, then it got lost in the 24 hr news cycle of repeating the days news, & no breaking shit of any kind.

The woman asked why the "left-wing media" wasn't giving the dead people any air time. I could hear in Rush's voice that he was relenting as if he didn't care about the people who hadn't survivied. Don't get me wrong, I don't care either,(woman should not go into politics, as Redd Butler in the Civil War film Gone With the Wind reminded her, politics is "mens business". & if you heard Nancy Pelosi say once she was elected House Speaker, she has broken the "glass ceiling", its tru, @ least for me, but remember; I'm the racist sexist loon who thinks he went out west to California for the Gold Rush in the late 1840s.)

But I care about people making pts about issues that are not getting heard, & this woman did that, & it annoyed Limbaugh terribly. He agreed w/ the woman, gave some bullshit, thanked the woman for the call & went onto teh next topic. That is classic Limbaugh, I wonder if he has any firearm or healthcare/insurance sponsors who wanted that woman off the air, to keep her from blasting them any mor than she had? I'll need to check that.

Yes I know very few of you probably remember the caller, (in the whoe 3 hrs of callers that day), but I agreed w/ the woman. She questioned why the media hadn't given as much air time ot the dead from that day, as they did in the public officials recovery. I've heard about enough of her recovery. Since she a member of Congress for the 2nd or 3rd time, there's no doubt she would get more attention than the dead.

& yes, the news reported that she was the last of the survivors who recuperated in the UMC (University Medical Center) to leave for a better location, it was good to hear that, but w/ that, the news left the dead people's families go in favor of someone the nation (not just AZ) knew. Now that was bullshit. The left wing media needs to close the case on those who dead that day, before they go on to the recovery of the living. We know plenty about Giffords, (SHE'S ALIVE PEOPLE, END OF STORY; CASE CLOSED) we need more shit on the other people.

@ least Fox News needs to do more reporting on the lesse known victims. That's only my opinion, but the last time I checked, my opinion was worth a few dead people's lives.

Saw a piece on History Ch about American Nazis today

2011-01-22T12:35:00.000-08:00

The channel makes them out to be a horrible group. When I 1st heard about the group (in the mid 30s) they were made up of mostly German-Americans &/nor German Nationals. I never had time to meet any of them personally until I was shipped off to Europe BY Uncle Sam to literally "kill" Nazis.

The US gov had made the party, in control of government of Germany, the Nationalist Socialist German Workers Party, into something that was anti-American. However, once I was found one night, w/in a couple wks of landing in France, by the patrolling Gestapo, they took me back to a local office to be "interogatted".

I didn't scare easily, as I had survived more than these kids had (death by lynching) & threats on my life & came back from the dead a number of times during the last 40 yrs. I told them this, (thru an interpretor who also didn't believe me), they all thought I was a riot. I told them being American, I had trouble understanding the US govs drawing of them (The Nazis), & that was why I had allowed their men to pick me up. I could have killed them all, as the president had asked, but I didn't just want to be another sheep in the flock. I wanted to hear the enemies side of the story.

So we sat their for 3-4 hrs, I downing several soda pops, while the officers downed glass after galss of schnapps. As they explained the Fehurers philosophy more & more, I thought more of my southern liberal democratic kinship to the rulling party in Germany. I explained what the American gov was pushing it's young 17-30 yr old men to believe, but I wasn't having any of it.

I told the group, how the north, after the Civil War bullshitted the Souths reasons for maintaining slavery. What Uncle Sam was trying to sell to me about them (the nazis) was the same bullshit the north was trying to convince to nation to believe about the South. I was buying any of it. That was why I wasn't buying any of the US's bullshit about the Nazis, I wanted actualy authentic nationalist socialist german workers to tell me what they stood for; not what AMERICA said they stood for.

The group of boys said that I could join if I wished, but I would have to denounce my allegience to the Allied cause, in order to do it. I told them let's just stick w/ being a financial contributor fo now (that was how I got the receipt many of you saw me bring w/ me to my Letterman/Leno/Kimmel appearances last yr). I found that the nazis stood for many of the things I stood for, many of the things old soutern liberal democrats stood for during & prior to the Civil War. Most of them had died by the end of WWI. I, being immortal, remembered going to the funerals of many of my old Confederate friends.

The reason for this post is, after seeing the History Ch program: Nazi America: A Secret History, I believe that program was just American propaganda to show American superiority to the racist sexist, bigoted ideology of Germany in the mid 30s to late 40s. People say the things I stand for remind them of nazis. THAT is why I don't understand the programs pt. The program made Nazis out to be horrible. Yes they didn't come out & SAY EXACTLY THAT, but I am smart enough to read between the lines.

What I read thru that program was, Nazis are in the same category as disease infected insects, I mean the bottom of the food chain, not human. B/c I said I held a kind of kinship to the boys I spoke to, b/c of what the old southern liberal democrats I was raised by, raised w/, I feel I have a connect to the people of Germany. Fuck how the History Ch portrayed them. Most of the english speaking world looks @ Nazis & old American South liberal dems in the same way: Racist, sexist, bigoted, ungodly people, who shouldn't have the soup box that, b/c of the American 1st amendent, they have a right to.

I say, bullshit. I'm no Nazi, but I have put in the same category as them b/c of our shared views. It's totally fucked up.

There, I said my piece. Goodbye.

On this MLK Day, I am here in my LA office, in a 90% empty office tower

2011-01-17T09:25:00.000-08:00

Well, the board last month demanded I allow those, who chose to take today off to remember a nigger preacher, have the day off. However, in exchange for that consession, I demanded they agree to a 50% pay cut for any absent employees. This is the upteenth time I was here w/ just maintainence. Only the newbies ask why I came to work, but I tell the seasoned employees to tell them why, on a FEDERAL HOLIDAY, the chairman, founder, & CEO is @ work.

I assume other Fortune 500 multinationals & Forbes 400 members may be taking the day off, but they also have their blackberry close @ hand, in case of needing to give orders. People after a time find out about my political & cultural opinions, & left it @ that, as shocking as they see it. I'll be here all day, working. I will probably be making my attempts to call Sean Hannity to give him the piece of my mind that I had planned for last month. I'll make 20-30 attempts, then try again tomorrow.

Ya'll already know how I feel about todays federal holiday honoring a southern nigger preacher. Being a white southern liberal democrat, I'd rather see people going to work today as if it were any other day.

If you want to know my political views on todays "holiday", leave a comment. More later.

20 calls to Limbaugh/Hannity radio show/no answer

2011-01-12T15:31:00.000-08:00

I told ya'll I'd call Hannitys radio show yesterday, yet as the title says, I not only failed in that, I failed to get the deaf and dumb Rush Limbaugh on the line. So I called the office back home to say I'm staying here in Nor Cal @ a local fan's home either until the end of the month or until I can get either Hannity or Limbaugh on the phone.

Both of the closeted racists & bigots are talking shit about how the left is "twisting" what they, on the right & other conservatives, are portraying the young college failure turned attempted assassin as. The right is zeroing in on the boys lifestyle; while the left is asking (WHY NOT FUCKING DEMAND!!!) for gun control legislation. To that the right, according to Hannity & Limbaugh, is saying leave our guns alone, you just wanna take our guns away.

Ah, no. We just want better enforcement of CURRENT gun laws. Loughner was denied ammo @ one Walmart after being sold a semi-automatcic handgun; but was granted a few extended clips @ another. The media needs to interview the people who sold the shit to him to see how his demeanor was; in case their concerns should have been raised. Since Loughner had no record on file w/ th FBI the gun dealer figured he had problem selling the "heat" to Loughner (again, we need to see the media interview th people who sold the stuff to Loughner).

It should not be about his lifestyle; it should be about gun control. But right there, 2nd Amendment defenders will, I guarantee you, cry foul. The founding father, no matter how justifyed they were in the 18th century, did not consider restrictions on whether people who have shown multiple signs of mental disorder, should be sold weapons of death.

2nd Amendment defenders have no arguement when it comes to whether adults with mental disorders should be granted the sale of a firearm & ammunition. They will also argue that if we want to profile people, to determine if they are mentally sane enough to maturally handle a gun, there will be lawsuits to demand that to be left up to the state to enforce. But recall (1) the founding fathers did not consider whether the mentally disabled would be asking to buy guns. & (2) there were a number of warning signs (dots being drawn) in the man's world (the military refused him, he did not graduate high school, after several attempts to get thru college, the school kicked him out, in the wks before the shooting people had remarked on how he needed mental counseling) yet none of the dots (warning signs) were connected prior.

Again, like the subheading of this site says: America is inherently flawed; & I have just proven it.

Leave a comment w/ your promise that you will sign my petition to put my name on the state & federal ballot for the '12 election, so I can prove why you should not sent a mortal to do an IMMORTALS job.

Giffords was pro-gun; will she change her stance after yesterdays incident?

2011-01-09T08:36:00.000-08:00

As much as I'd like to see that, she's probably among those members of Congress who get financially mnipulated by a shit-load of cash from firearm industry lobbyists for her reelection campaign.

I heard she's likely to recover since she is a federal/public official. I'm sure yesterday in the hr that Giffords was shot, there had to be @ least 10 people lined up for surgery @ the local medical center there in Tucson, but since she's a Congresswoman @ the federal level, she got 1st dibbs. Why?

B/c she was in Congress, she was a political celeb. Do any of you recall if Michael Jackson had to wait in line @ the hospital for an opening in the ER? I can tell you for certain, Jackson was put next in line for surgery, ahead of the locals. If I were mortal & suffered a gunshot wound to the head (I can guarantee you that the latter twice in December & will happen @ least twice this month), I would ALSO be rushed to the ER, put next in line ahead of those locals who had been waiting @ least a yr to get into the room.

Locals who bhave been waiting on a list to have surgery for a yr or more, don't get to keep their place if a national celeb is wounded nearby. They'll have to wait until the celeb is brought back from Deaths doorway & back into the hall. That really confuses me about mortals: Once any of them attain a certain status of celebrity (either in the sciences, sociology, architecture, business, entertainment, politics) it gives them respect their supports believe they deserve & their opponent think they don't.

Are any liberal dems (nigger, minority or otherwise)glad that one of theirs is in the white house? Fucking yes. Can that be said for conservative republicans or card carrying white supremists & labeled racist, like myself? Hell no. You will only be sympathetic if the person in the spotlight was promoting a cause you supported, otherwise;

FUCK 'EM!!!!

Same with Giffords. Fox News reported that during the so called Obamacare chaiin of events, she had been harassed for her support. Now she's been shot by a young man who Fox News, using Myspace & Facebook posts, labeled as unbalanced.

It's only those who do things that you don't support who are called unbalanced. This last wk, the republican majority in the house recited a "updated version" of the Constitution. When it came to the requirement of anyone who was campaigning for president to prove their national citizenship, a woman from the back of the room; peanut gallery, called for Obama birth certificate.

I'm asking for those of Fox News & Fox news Radio to admit that their platform for delivering the news was what caused mister Jared Lee Loughner to go "Fox News" on the House Rep. I'm hoping many of you reading that will call them some time this wk (I plan to call Sean Hannitys radio from here on the west coast to confront him on shit load of issues) & give them a piece of your mind. "Fair & Balanced", they say they are. I say prove it.

Don't shout down liberals who come on your network in order to give an opposite opinion. Let them speak. Hear a g-d damn 2nd opinion.

Giffords was pro-gun. Now that she's been shot by one, will she reconsider her stance? I'd like to see it happen. But I highly doubt it. The gun lobby has a ballpark figure of about $10 billion to spend on & shmooze lawmakers. That's why so many people have died from firearm related violence in the last decade yet no legislation followed. Yes, there was & is mourning the dead, but after 6-12 months Giffords will either have to relinguish her seat or return to work.

As I speak I have Fox News on on mute, & the headlines read that the House is postponing work until the shooting is dealth w/. That makes it sound like we will have Obamacare for a little while longer until Giffords shooting case all comes together. As much as republicans want to repeal it, some conservative conspiracy theorists will claim that Giffords shooting was a stunt to push the vote to repeal Obamacare down the road.

Some on the right are likely to consider that Giffords volunteered to pull the stunt, but then they have to consider what Fox News found on Jared Lee Loughners Myspace & Facebook pages. All that shit. The boy must have ODed on Fox News's bullshit. The boys posts literally described a person in fear. Just watch Fox News for an hr or 2 & you'll see that the channel wants all of ya'l o your toes.

You know: "Fox News Alert's", & what Hannity describes as the rights fight for America. It's big businesses fight for control of the American consumner, asshole. Do a google search for FreeSpeechTV. Will ya'll be shocked. You think Fox News spreads fear of what the left will do once in power, FreeSpeechT spreads fear of what the right will do once in power. It's up to you to decide whose bullshit ya'll want to believe.

As for my question for Gabby Giffords: she will most likely heal, go back to work but not bring up gun control legislation. She's just to weak to fight them. & in her state of AZ, where damn near every private citizen carries one.

Even though she was shot by one, held by a young man high on Fox News bull shit. No gun control legislation. Not enough people have died.

My opinion of the Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) shooting

2011-01-08T14:42:00.000-08:00

I'm not going to send any well wishes or keep her family in my thoughts. Why? I'll tell you:

Fox News got the news from NPR, & just last Fox News Sunday The Weekly Standards Bill Krystal rattled off a list of things he hoped the new GOP majority in th House would do this yr. In that list was SHUTTING DOWN NPR!!! I doubt Fox News would get any breaking news from around the nation w/o npr. Krystals wants it shut down. Once that's done, how will Fox News get breaking news, unless from cnn, msnbc, nbc, abc, & cbs.

The public officials down in Arizona are also pro-gun. That fact alone is my reason why I refuse to send condolences or keep Giffords family in my thoughts & prayers. If there was gun control, I can guarantee you that Ms. Giffords would still be alive. According to Fox News, Giffords had been harassed for her support of Obamacare. Yes, McCain gave his statement, but that's expected of all politican.

I can tell you this much, I would not pull the party line. That's another reason why I have not been elected Colunbia mayor, SC Gvnr, US Senator or Rep from SC, b/c I would hold true to my own form of bullshit, excuse me, political beliefs. Was Scott Rodder (the anti-abortion abortion doctor killer) executed? Remember him? I doubt he's been executed, he's still alive in prison.

I'd donate $5 million dollars each to the Westboro Baptist Church & my local TEA party @ least 48 hrs AFTER both Scott Rodder & Gabrielle Giffords killer are executed & put to death. Why do I say that?

B/c neither will happen. America loves it's guns like it does its religion. No fucking way is any politican going to take my guns from me. I don't care HOW MANY people die of firearm related causes. I will defend the 2nd amendment until all those dumb enough to use a gun to dominate & threaten others kill more. NO gun control. I'll vote you out of office the next time your up for reelection if you sign gun control legislation. I have a right to defend myself from anyone who wants to take my guns away, even if I kills people w/ them. I had my reasons for doing it.

Giffords killer's was she supported Obamacare.

Again Giffords gets no sympathy from Jeremi Wilks. Her injury doesn't need pity, her injury needs gun control legislation. When will we get it? Most likely never. Why? B/c that's America, people. We love our guns.

Thank you, Jesus, for allowing us to keep our guns, no matter how many people die & are killed by it. Amen.

Well, I'm back here in Cali; Still have some projects to oversee

2011-01-05T17:42:00.001-08:00

Thank g-d I didn't schedule meetings & project oversight in fag SF. I was down in entertaining LA. Some liberals there but not as homosexuality as in SF. I signed off on a acquisition of a Technology company that I had funded from start-up mode, back in the in the 6 months during/after 9/11. The company has been headquartered here since the late 90s, & had the majority of its customers in NYC. When customers there freaked, that fall about their nations security, their sales dropped by over 25%.

I heard about them from Eric (ya know; my son) when he was @ USC (South Carolina, not Southern Cali). He had friends who were their loyal customers who slowly had to cut back on purchases when they couldn't find work after college once they entered the workforce. I offered to fly the small business owners back east to pitch their business model, as a 23rd birthday gift to my son.

As you can see, I was sold. I gave the business access to 4 of my $250k bank accounts (yes, that means I sunk a million dollars into the business to test my sons college friend's loyalty). The business was worth about half a million, with about 1,000 clients, & under 50 employees when I first started investing but remaining outside help & not buying them out. & today, with the signing of the buyout contract, they are worth over a quarter million, had expanded over 4 times, & hired about 200 new employees.

So that's why I'm out here. What I plan to do tomorrow is what I planned to do the wk before Christmas. I called constitutional conservative & Fox News talk show host Sean Hannity. His screener wouldn't let me talk to Hannity, b/c the next hr & a half was already pre-scheduled. They said he wouldn't be back until Jan 5th. Looks like they lied. He came back this past Monday.

So the conversation I planned to have w/ him that wk, will happen on Monday. Cheers.

If Rush & Sean have the right to bash the negro pres & 1st lady, as much as I don't like niggers; I have the right to bash conservatives like them

2010-12-16T14:07:00.000-08:00

Yes Rush Limbaugh, as a conservative pro-republican, claimed that Michelle Obama hates, HATES, w/ a passion, the exposure she & the girls are getting b/c her husband & her daughters father is the president of the US. But according to liberal cable tv, she loves the work she's doing.

Limbaugh, as well as Sean Hannity, claim that Obama's administration should be kicked out, claiming that Obama is a socialist, fascist, crazy liberal. Limbaugh says Obama is less like an American president, & more like an American dictator, calling the administration, a REGIME, as if Obama didn't win the election in a landslide.

& yes, I know, Hannity & Limbaugh are paid to say the things they say, by the rightwing of the richest 2% of what Hannity & Limbaugh claim are The American People. The right wing of the richest 2% pay lobbyists to fund the reelection campaigns of conservative & TEA party candidates who promise to give massive take breaks back to the right wing of the richest 2%.

I am still here in Columbia, blogging from my 98 story Wilks Tower in downtown Columbia. I leave for Cali tonight aboard my gulf stream. Yes, if that makes me sound rich, you would be correct. However, very few my fellow billionaires, esp. on the right, would rather hide from the public view while they spend their share of the Bush 2003/2006 tax cuts (much of it the hard earned cash of the middle class) on extravagance.

You can see it, every yr when Forbes comes out w/ its list of the wealthiest 400. You don't have to buy a copy, just stop by a Barnes& Noble, Borders, Wal-Mart, & just flip thru the periodical to see what your (assumed to be middle & lower class) taxes ar going towards.

I recall, from an episode of Sean Hannity's radio show, that he drives a Escalade. That would be a CADILLAC Escalade. Yes he drives an enormous SUV. Most likely a hybrid, so he can claim that he's saving the planet. Ya'll know my positon on "Saving the Planet" from the late social comic George Carlin. The man really should drive an SUV that gets fuel economy in the teens or
20s, so he can help big oil make more profits. I also enjoy record profits. He says he's a capitalist. I wonder why he drives a HYBRID escallade?

Well, I'll ask him tomorrow from Nor Cal. I really don't like going out there. There are homosexuals out there. Hannity & I would agree on that. Homosexuality will send believers to hell. I doubt he'll want to comment on that.

Rush Limbaugh thinks things will undoubtedly get better once Congress is republican-controlled. Does he even recall what the last republican congress brought about? The recession that just ended as a result of this yrs Black Friday & Cyber Monday holiday season shopping sales. $40-45 billion in sales. Tell that to the prosperity nay-sayers. Those who think we're still in a recession. Corporations weren't (& still aren't, excluding WGE) spending profits on expanding their workforce. They were enlarging their bank accounts, saving it in case of reentering another recession, stock portfolios & living the life on display in Forbes & DuPont Registry magazines.

As you can seel I can't wait to get Hannity (possibly Limbaugh before him) on the phone to give this rant. He'll mostly likely cut me off by saying "Get off the phone ya dope". Conservatives don''t like the truth about themselves. I sound like Ida Tarbell don't I. Ya'll remember her don't ya? From the 1870s thru WWI. Look her up you Hannity- & Limbaugh-lovers. You deserve to get little from the coming tax cuts of 2011.

Yes you will get a tax cut, but so will I. I will most likely get a 100 grand or more, since I am billionaire. Hannity will most likely get a healthy tens of thousands. He won't want to hear that from billionaire. But you in the middle class will most likely get less than a grand. W/ that, the government will have to borrow more $$$ from China, b/c it gave the money back to the taxpayer, to cover repairing old national infrastructure, paying federal worker. More borrowing, b/c republicans wanted to give the tax payer back their money. But how will infrastructure be paid for.

Obviously, we will borrow it from China, again, reducing the global value of the US dollar. I wonder if Hannity's even come to this site. He probably will once I call. I have have been snubbed a few times by the media & Forbes over the mass-murderer accusation. Hannity will be shocked. Maybe I should also call Limbaugh. Give him a taste of my position.

Let me think about it.

Please note: I'll be out in California from this Friday until Monday

2010-12-14T13:58:00.000-08:00

As many of you readers should know by now, the heb from California, Marcus, lives out there. I'll be meeting w/ him this coming weekend. Although he didn't want me to meet him to meet his family, we decided to meet in San Francisco in Saturday. Just for one afternoon. He has told me in personal emails how much he disagrees w/ right wingers like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.

He wanted me to give Sean a call on his afternoon radio talk show to introduce myself. I agreed. So I will be making a call this Friday afternoon Pacific time to introduce myself to Hannity. I don't know if he knows me, but I know him. If someone of ya'll are on the west coast, ya'll will want to tune your am radios to 1360 AM, or play the station live over the web, @ kfiv1360.com. I'll be calling Hannity during his afternoon show to give him a piece of my mind & explain what makes the two of us different & what makes the two of us the same.

He may kick me off for my anti-conservative views & my pro-slavery, anti-affirmative action, anti-civil rights, pro-big government, pro-high taxes, stance. The rest of it most of you should know by now. I, like Hannity & Limbaugh, spew it whenever we can & whenever the idea comes up.

So remember, I'll be in Northern California, this Friday until next Sunday. & you'll be able to listen to me (hopefully, if Sean lets me talk before hanging up on me) give my piece & pt of view. If none of you know what I sound like, you'll hear me this Friday, calling randomly, into the Sean Hannity radio talk show, on AM 1360 KFIV.

He may cut me off before I can say what I want to say. If that happens, I'll call him back. I'll call him back until he lets me on to talk.

See you Friday afternoon; from Northern California.

I have something to say to republicans who say we shouldn't raise taxes in a recession

2010-12-02T09:21:00.000-08:00

Why do you say we're still in a recession? Look @ the sales on Black Friday and Cyber Monday: $45 Billion. I understand you common sense conservatives and constitutional conservatives are being funded the same corporation who are laying off thousands of workers and made billions over the Black Friday weekend TO SAY that Uncle Sam should not raise taxes on the American people.

Yes, I won't deny it; I, as the public symbol of WGE Corporation (#12 on the Fortune 500), also made huge profits over last weekend. However I am willing to state the truth about my political connections, while conservative commentators (like Rush Limbough, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck and others) will not, per the demand of their sponsors, who I must add are big pharma, big tobacco, big oil, and big banks. Yes, WGE owns and runs drug and banking companies; but unlike MSNBC & NPR, I will not ban my employees from funding causes I consider repulsive, just like I have read in the blogosphere how much my employees hate my racist, sexist, ageist, bigoted, and blasphamous stance on affirmative action.

I do not care about this. My financial support to groups liberals call hate groups but conservatives call liberty, freedom& rights-protecting groups, or groups conservatives call hate group and liberal call free speech groups makes WGE employees uneasy. However, unlike MSNBC or NPR, WGE doesn't ban its employees from funding causes I (the company head and founder) consider bringing about the downfall of America. Why?

My funding of causes I feel address my needs and the causes WGE employees feel address their needs are both considered free speech. Yet, MSNBC & NPR don't see it that way when it pertains to their employee, Keith Olberman. Nor NPR when it pertains to comments it's now former employee Juan Williams made about seeing travelers of Middle Eastern deccent on plane he is traveling on.

Back to the main pt of this post. I guess it would cost conservatives their paychecks if they refused to state what their sponsors and reelection campaign donors told them to say to the press & the public. When they say "liberals are mentally incometent for wanting to raise taxes in a recession", THEY AREN'T SAYING IT B/C THEY BELIEVE IT, THEY ARE SAYING IT B/C THEY'RE BEING PAID TO SAY IT. BY THOSE SAME CORPORATION WHO WOULD LOSS HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN PROFIT TO CORPORATE AND PAYROLL TAXES IF LIBERALS GOT THEIR WAY OF RAISING TAXES. THAT'S WHY CONSERVATIVES ARE SAYING "IT'S INSANE TO RAISE TAXES IN A RECESSION".

The recession is over, the proof is the record profits I & dozens of other big businesses made over the Black Friday weekend. Again, let me repeat: $45 billion in sales. That's 2.3% HIGHER than Black Friday LAST YR. What kind of national health insurance or publically-funded education or jobs could that have bought?

Recession? What recession?

Well, we won't see that kind of money again for a while. Thank you corporate whore conservatives on conservative talk radio, on Fox News & in Washington. Ya'll made this possible.

I'm not the only heartless billionaire in the US after all.

What would the T.E.A. party think of Leibewitz/Colberts rally in DC?

2010-10-30T16:10:00.000-07:00

Although I'm not one of them, I'll bet most of the TEA party believes the rally shouldn't have occured. They would think it wasn't as influencial as Glenn Becks rally, however preachy Leibewitz & Colbert were in their show. I'll bet TEA partiers would have loved to have protested & picketed the rally, just like Fred Phelps & his Westboro Baptist Church do for dead gay & straight military personel.

Plenty of liberal, nigger & white, music, tv & sports personalities performered @ the rally. I did not attend but I would have contributed since Leibewitz & Colbert stood for things I stand for. Both of them; not one or the other. If you asked who Leibewitz is; go to wikipedia & do a search on Jon Stewart (the host of today rally as well as Comedy Centrals Daily Show), you'll see who I'm talking about.

I didn't turn on the show until I heard the news of it happening @ the top of the hr on NPRs news quiz Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me. I only saw the show from there until it ended @ 3. That is how I know what kinds of people appeared. Yes I listen to NPR, which, by conservative right wingers, would label me a liberal. However, I am not completely liberal. As I've said in previous posts, I stand for things the left thinks the right stands for, things the right thinks the left stands for, as well as things neither side stands for (but @ one pt in Americas past, one side & both sides stood for) anymore.

What did ya'll think of the rally? Did any of you attend? Who did you go to see, if not Leibewitz & Colbert? Did you agree w/ everything that was said? If not, what did you disagree w/? Leave a comment.

Talk to you later.

Well @ least he's not afraid to admit it

2010-10-25T16:27:00.000-07:00

I heard Hannity say on his radio show today that he, replying to a callers stances as socialist, was not a socialist, but a capitalist. He said it in the same way I've always coped to being a racist, sexist, bigot, anti-semite, ageist, blaspheimer. Although I don't say it point blank, I've been labeled as such by over 30 million people, not just native born Americans but naturalized foreigners.

While Sean will deny being a republican, the things he stands for, republicans stand for. All I need to use is deductive reasoning to know what he is. I don't deny being all the assumed negative labels I've been called, I don't deny them. When asked if the labels are smears or are correct, I've said the things I've stood for for the last century & a half, @ the beginning, were welcomed as "he's one of us" by deep south southerns, however, in the last 30-40 yrs, the attitude has turned negative.

The only thing that has changed is the populations attitude. My stance hasn't. Liberal environmental dems don't like Hannity b/c he's not one of them & doesn't support their causes. Know what he says to that? He brushes it off as nothing @ all; below him. I do the same to those who call my opinions & views as racist, sexist, ageist, bigoted, anti-sematic & blasphamise. Nothing @ all.

Yet we both have tens of millions of fans as well as several million enemies. But do either of us care? If you ask Sean, he'd have the same answer as I do.

Not @ all.

I have come to learn that not everyone out there agrees w/ me

2010-10-22T09:56:00.001-07:00

Women, wet-backs, niggers, kykes, catholics, christians, evangelicals, conservatives, republicans, muslims: I was raised to believe they were all mentally & socially inferior to me (old southern baptist). & between Reconstruction (Post-Civil War to 1890s) & the 1970s, research, from around the world proving this, was published far & wide.

While there is updated research that now disputes these findings, there are still OVER HALF A BILLION PEOPLE ACROSS THE GLOBE WHO BELIEVE HOOK, LINE & SINKER THAT WE NEED TO REINSTATE LAWS ENFORCED DURING MY LIVING YRS (Antebellum Deep South (1800-65)). Why won't people like me stand up for what we want? B/c the voters today are too progressive to go back to that time. A time of sexist, ageism, racist, bigotry, anti-semitism, blasphamy.

Many a conservative have asked, if I stand for such things, why do I vote liberal? I vote liberal on things that I consider liberal and vote conservative on things I consider conservative. If you saw my ads last spring & this summer campaigning for Grahams, DeMints & Sanfords seats as well as petitioners who stood outside businesses, hung out @ USCs campus & walked door-to-door to gain signatures to put my name on the ballot to overthrow Graham, Demint, &/or Sanford, you now realise that I didn't make it.

You should be able to figure out why? My political views are too extreme. Called so by both sides of the political arena. While I do agree w/ evangelical T.E.A. party christian conservatives regarding returning to constitutional values, I disagree w/ them on how the values should be enforced. I do agree that non-whites should loose their citizenship, property, civil & voting rights, women should loose their voting rights & leave their jobs & return to the home to be a homemaker barefoot & pregnant, & Uncle Sam should not have the right to spend my tax dollars on federal funding of abortion clinics.

Views like these gave me less than 10% of the votes needs win a primary election against Graham, Demint, Haley (the women expected to win Sanfords governorship). While I refused to conceed the ballot results, & refused to throw my support behind any of them, I brought the question, of why I didn't win on what I stand for, each to Graham, DeMint & Haley. They told me maybe I should have changed my stand on everything I said I stood for.

I asked why? They said if you want to be elected, you need to stand for what the people want from a new blood. I asked them, does that mean I have to lie about what I stand for in order to win votes? They didn't answer that. I asked them, since they're conservatives & republicans, if they were to move to liberal country, would they willingly change (not lie, change) their political ideology in order to gain favor in liberals in their locale? They just smiled. I finished by saying I think I've made my pt.

For all of you who DID vote for me, I guarantee you I will run again for SCs US House, Senate & Governorship next time it comes up for reelection. If ya'll will recall this yr was my 6th times running for office (every election since Y2K) on what I stand for. Seems not enough people (liberal or conservative) agree w/ what I stand for. Times seem to have certainly changed.

If you have something to say, leave a comment.

More later.

Hannity, Limbaugh, Beck & FNC: Was the Great Depression FDRs fault, or Hoovers?

2010-10-08T08:29:00.000-07:00

All those conservative personalities believe that, since Obama has been pres for two yrs, the high unemployment rate, slow job growth, weak economy, weak healthcare reform bill, national debt, and on and on, are all his fault. I heard Rush and Sean's radio shows & heard both say, as if it were blatently obvious, that everything he inherited from Bush were his fault. I have to ask, I just gotta:

Was the Great Depression FDRs fault? He was pres during the crisis. That's the exact same analogy conservative republicans are using to explain why Dems don't know how to govern. They are blaming Dems for the problems that resulted from decision their pick for pres for the 2000 and 2004 pres election made. The problems America is suffering from are not Obamas fault. Not that I like Obama; I didn't vote for the nigger. Once John Edwards of NC dropped out of the race after his wife contracted cancer, I couldn't bring myself to vote for either a conservatvie republican, a woman or a nigger.

Saying that, the high unemployment rate, slow job growth, weak economic growth, rising national debt, are not Obamas fault. I go back to the FDR & Great Depression analogy. Were the two connected? I'd like to ask Hannity, Beck & Limbaugh that question. Maybe I will today. I'll call Hannitys & Limbaughs radio shows & ask them that question.

If they call me just a crazy liberal for asking such a question, I'll ask again. I'll explain my analogy of Roosevelt-Hoover-Great Depression connection, & remind them of things I heard them say a couple times this week about things I said @ the start of this post. I'll ask them all to clarify what they know of the 20s and 30s of the last century. They will know nothing. NOTHING!!

Between the last paragraph & this one, I emailed Rush. Left a few paragraphs in the email. I asked him this same question. I doubt he will respond, since the things I said in the email were so not 21st century liberal. However, I can't live w/o hope. I left this sites address in the email, in case he wanted to, just for the fuck of it, to read what I have to say. I would really like to hear from him.

More later.

Sean Hannity; like everyone on FNC & Radio; are suffering from short-term memory loose

2010-10-06T16:41:00.000-07:00

He, along w/ Ann Coulter, Rush Limbugh, Glenn Beck, & many other born-again, evangelical christian conservatives have forgotten how we went into debt after Clinton's high taxes were nixed by Bush in his 1st term in office. I would hope right wingers would admit, after the Clinton yrs of high taxes & big gov, how did we get into the debt they so love to lay @ Obama, liberals and socialist Americans feet?

We still have the income tax rate of Bush (until @ least New Yrs Day 2011). Until then, we still have Bushes low tax rate that Hannity, Beck, Limbugh, Coulter, Christine O'Donnell, Sharron Angle think we left behind two yrs again. Wrong, we still have them, again, until New Yrs Day 2011. I plan to call Limbughs & Hannityies FNR (Fox News Radio) shows to ask them for a ballpark figure of how much they received as part of Bushes tax cuts after Clintons two terms of high taxes? They'll probably dodge the question. I also plan to tell them how much you readers have told me in your emails to me you received from Bush.

I do recall from 2006, NPRs & FNC contributor Mara Liasson reporting on a study of what industry got a boost after the checks went out @ that pt.: If you don't recall, I'll tell you now, & you can check for yourself. What industry got the biggest boost from the 2006 Bush tax taxes? Porn sites. Sales of subscriptions to porn sites grew the most from Bushes tax cuts. Again, I'd like to ask Fox News & conservative personalities for a ball park figure of how much their rebate from Bush was worth?

I'll admit right here & now, then say to all of them (conservative personalities) once I get them on the phone: I got between half a million & a million dollars. & yes, as Hannity & Limbaugh brag about small businesses, but I doubt big business, I reinvested in hiring the unemployed. Again, I doubt other big business did that. & now, according to liberal MSNBC & allegedly bi-partisan NPR, after Obama & Bush signed a stimulus to big business hoping they would use the $$$ to hire the unemployed or build more factories, Big Business has done NO SUCH THING!!!

They still have over a trillion dollars, in taxpayers funds, given to them, assuming, NOT CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATED THEM, to build more factories, hire more people to build more products. They have yet to announce such news.

Will someone please tell Fox News & their conservative personalities that we all (not just the left or right) need to demand "the left" (since no right wing conservative will accept Obama as their leader) tell Obama to deal w/ big business not using their trillion dollar stimulus to get the economy moving forward again?

Or I will, & ya'll know, from reading & hearing what I stand for, don't want me to get on the niggers case.

So I've been listening to Fox News Sean Hannitys radio show since last spring...

2010-09-24T13:12:00.000-07:00

His show is being sponsored by ads selling creditfairy.com. It is a website that gives Americans w/ credit card debt steps to improve their credit. My beef w/ the site is how it's being sold. It is being sold as a person (a fairy) who can magically improve anyones credit score no matter how bad it is. Just so the consumer can get a loan (either for a car or a home) they know they want but, w/ whatever income they have, would spend the next 30 yrs paying back, if not lose the home when the loans rate goes up 2-3 times it's original rate.

If one thinks back (I know, for all you conservatives, you see the Bush-era as a time when you could earn more $ by closing more home loan deals that would be considered unethical by todays standards, but again ethics is worth less to you than cold hard currency), back to 2003-7, w/ the housing- and credit-boom, remember that era? There were plenty, PLENTY of credit fairies; most likely @ Bear Stearns, AIG, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, & the other banks. They were making major "bank" off people who bought into Bushes idea that it was possible to get a home loan or credit and not have to give up front $ in order to prove the bank that you were committd to paying back the loan.

How did that work for everyone? Can you still get a job as a credit fairy, like the ones I described earlier? While, many a conservative would deny the existence of credit fairies ,they will accuse me of being a crazy liberal. Yes I am a liberal, but I also have names of businesses that, while no longer in existence, employed men and women who did the work of "credit fairies".

If any of you would like the names of companies that did the work of "credit fairies", leave your email in a comment on this post so I can sends their names to you. Again, I'm just saying that the ads on Fox News Radio selling the idea of a credit fairy doesn't exist? Well, they may not exist anymore, but there were at least a 5 million of them across America during the Bush Administration. Since the recession hit, nearly all of them either closed shop or resigned from their jobs & have remained tight lipped since. Most likely too embarassed to admit selling home & credit card loans to people who w/in a yr of signing the contract, losing their homes.

My main pt is that the ad, airing on Fox News Radio, of Creditfairy.com (about the non-existence of fairies that could magically improve any terrible credit score), it may no longer be true, but back during the Bush era, there were millions who did this shit. Fox News Radio is again spining the truth.

Comment if you disagree. I want to hear from those who think what I say is total bullshit. How many of you believe Bush was a g-d-send, & not the worst pres in over a century. Comment.

A guest on Sean Hannitys Fox News Radio yesterday asked about the connection between Islamic Radicals & 9/11

2010-09-10T11:51:00.000-07:00

There was a Jordanian-American muslim woman on his radio show yesterday asking another woman, who sounded more American than the Jordanian, why Islamic Radicals like, and lead by, Osama Bin Laden attacked America on 9/11? As far as I can recall, neither came up w/ an answer I could live w/. So here I am w/ why I think Bin Laden and Al-Queda attacked us:

It really didn't matter the day, the day was not important. It could have happened on 8/20, or 10/5, or 9/28, & the list can keep going. It has nothing to do w/ the date. Limbaugh, Hannity & Beck (all either sound like evangelical conservatives or born agains) all think the arab world wanted to spread Sharia law, like Christain tried during the middle ages. Not true. & if you (Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity) are offered this post to read, I would love to talk it over w/ you about.

B/c you're scaring people w/ a hig school education and possible less than a complete college education. There are recording of Bin Laden, in his native tongue begging (& finally demanding) that American big business not push it's way into the traditional arab islamic world. He warned us repeatedly (all thru the 80s and 90s). It all came to a head when he successfully pulled off an ass whopping costing us less than 3000 lives. It is not his fault for doing that. It was our American consumerism tnhat we thought should be offered to the rest of the world.

Only we refused to accept the demands and "thanks, but no thanks" fro uber-traditionalist muslims when Coke, Apple, Microsoft, GM, Nike, Gaterade, MLB & NFL all gradually pushed it's products on the young & the igornant of the muslim world. We couldn't just stop @ Europe, SE Asia, Russia, North & South America, Africa: We needed to have our products in EVERY REGION OF THE PLANET. THAT was why Bin Laden & his network bombed us.

He said thanks but no thanks, to our sodas, music players, computers, high speed internet, no-contract cell phones. But would we take no for an answer? Not when there was a possibility of nearly $10 billion/yr profits to be made off the oil-rich arab world. We couldn't allow arab companies to reap the benefits of building up the arab worlds tech industry. What the hell would arabs do w/ $10 billion? Same question was askeed of black slaves by whites during the revolution if they took up arms against the British crown.

What are arabs doing w/ their $10 billion/yr? One of them used part of it to plan and execute an attack on the home of those who wouldn't take no for an answer. We still haven't refused to take no for an answer. How do I know? Once Al Aqueda attacked us, we retaliated. Have we made our point yet? We're going to our 9th yr in both Iraq & Afghanistan. In my opinion, I don't think so. I'm just waiting for the next attack, to see if American Big Business has taken the hint sent by traditional muslims & the radicals that they don't want our ipods, HDTVs, flat panel tvs, computers, high speed internet cell phones.

I'm just waiting, & I hope not very long. We (American Big Business) haven't yet taken the hint. I am a Big Business (WGE), & have taken their hint & have left the arab world. I do visits twice a yr offering my services and products to anyone over there who'd buy. I haven't forced my products on them thru sneaky radio & tv ads. I learned my lesson when I lost 3 floors & about 150 people in the WTC on 9/11. That's my connection to the date. Besides that I have tane the hint.

Will other big business do the same before they attack us again? I'm still waiting.

I have something to say about the 9/11 "Victory Mosque"

2010-08-14T08:24:00.000-07:00

I went online, & saw on TV, this morning, that Obama was giving his support for the proposed mosque in lower Manhattan. I also saw on those websites, & in clips on TV, that the GOP & families of those who died on 9/11 claimed that he "had abandoned America". They also said that the mosque would be built on the site, & THAT was why they boycotted & protested. But they're facts need to be checked.

1st of all, if one looked @ a scale map of the area, w. both sites marked, one would wonder where 9/11 families & the GOPs heads are @. Why? B/c the proposed site for the mosque is 2-3 blocks north of the world trade center site. In effect the GOP is lying to 9/11 families & 9/11 families have their facts wrong. The GOP & 9/11 families believe Obama has blemished & tarnished the honor of 9/11 victims by giving his support to the project. But if one looked @ a map of the area w/ both sites marked, they would see that the mosque would not be built on the site.

2nd of all, if Manhattan is off limits to a new mosque, where in America can they build one? There are @ least 4 other locations around the country where mosques projects are being planned & those sites are getting the same type of protest from locals. The GOP (esp newt gingrich) are asking why the muslim world is not allowing any churches in their nations yet America is allowing mosques on ours.

It is b/c the muslim world does not have the same principles as America. 9/11 families say Obama has abandoned his country. Is that to say they have accepted him as a citizen? Are they beyond the birth certificate issue? Have 9/11 families forgotten one right of legal citizens of this country: FREEDOM OF RELIGION. What I think about 9/11 families issue is: if you're in America you have to practice MY religion, NOT YOURS. That sounds like kykes, niggers & gypsies, witchcraft since the early 1800s.

NIMBY. That's (N)ot (I)n (M)y (B)ack(Y)ard to all you who have a high school diploma or less. The muslim world saw what Christianity did to, & in the Muslim world: butchering millions during the crusades between the 8th and 14th centuries in the name of a man who preached non violence. Christainity, such a peaceful faith. & ya'll wonder why the muslim world doesn't like you. That is not why I no longer practice. I was a practicing Southern Baptist until I was killed, w/in a few weeks after my return I gave up my faith, b/c of the lies mortal man was preaching about the next world; the afterlife.

I have been there several times since. Being killed by mortals twice a month b/c of my alleged superiority to mortal man. I preached about the past as my friends aged faster than I. They occasionally killed me in a fit of rage b/c of my desire to reconnect w/ our (my past). They all wanted to move forward.

Getting off track. 9/11 families have their facts fucked up. That is b/c of the GOP wanting to keep the war on terror going (many of their reelecton campaign donations are made by war & military defense contractors who have been making over a billion a yr since the conflict started). & about that concept of war. Bush declared war on Iraq & Afghanistan. If I knew my history (& I should, I lived thru it), the only entity, according to Constitution (that the GOP say they feverishly defend & hold to as tightly as their faith), that can declare war on ANY COUNTRY, is Congress.

I challenge anyone of you reading this: look for footage of Congress back in 2001, voting to pass a resolution to declare war on Iraq & Afghanistan. I'll donate a million dollars to any charity you'd like if you can find me tv footage of Congress doing so. You won't. B/c Congress didn't agree to it; only Govnr Bush did, & that is illegal. & yeah, the right will say, "there you go again, Wilks, same old libera, blaming Bush. Bush as been goen for nearly two years. You liberals have the Congress, White House, auto industry, home loan industry, banking industry. You need to take some responsibility."

Yeah, GOP, liberals are trying to clean up the mess you & Bush made between 2000-8. You're refusing to see the pt so I might as well give up & doing it all ourselves, b/c you'll just still there & argue w/ me. There is no talking to you.

I suggest we give the mosque site the green light, b/c the GOP doesn't believe in the Constitution as it is currently written. They refuse to accept any faith besides their own. Such good Americans, the liberal progressive Founding Fathers would be so proud.

Oh g-d, Wilks, will you never give up?

Bottom line: They all say "Thank you"

2010-08-11T14:32:00.001-07:00

Although there are nay sayers-a-plenty out there, disparaging me as a murderer & some have even tried assassinating me while stopped in traffic, but one of two things happen every time: I either wake up 8 hrs later as if nothing happened, or the bullets go right thru me like cheese. Those are the immortality deniers. This post pertains to those who deny that (demand to know those who) appeciate what I have been accused & later accquitted of.

Over the last 25 yrs, I have sent copies (I keep the originals) of thank you letters, from those who are glad "someone is doing something to their dead relative(s) killers", to a long list of news outlets so they can air a few of the letters to prove that not "everyone" is against me. I have over 50 file boxes of original typed & hand written letters thanking me for taking action against the guilty.

As of last yr, I have been found not guilty of murdering nearly 250 "known & @ large" murderers. Law enforcement just doesn't have the resources I have (I have been called "The Right Hand of G-d" by over a 50 million people). The budgets of law enforcement departments across the nation are stretched so think that there aren't enough officers to cover as much ground as I can.

However, just like the "birthers" continue to ask to see our nigger pres's birth certificate to prove his citizenship (even though the White House posted it online less than 6 months after the movement made the evening news), there are "thank you letter" deniers who refuse to believe that ANYONE would be glad that someone, I've been accused of murdering, was foun murdered. But there are.

I have nearly a million letters going back as far as 1978 thanking me for murdering people I have continued to emphatically denied killing, & challenged the law & the families of the murdered to get me convicted based on whatever evidence they could find.

As history shows, noone has found enough evidence to get me convicted, which must tell you one thing: I AM NOT A MURDERER.

But the thank you letters keep coming. If you don't believe me; leave your info in the comment section, so we can schedule a date & time to meet so I can prove that not everyone in America hates me & wishes me dead.

You know who I haven't heard or seen in the news in the last yr?

2010-08-10T15:37:00.000-07:00

Carrie Prejean. Remember her? She is the former-Miss Cal USA 2009 who lost her crown after giving a controversial answer, about her stance on gay marriage, to a well known gay blogger. Being a liberal white man, I watched it all unfold on the evening news and on the liberal cable channel MSNBC. The people over on MSNBC claimed during the chain of events that Prejean had filed a defamation suit against: Keith Olberman & his Countdown show.

Olberman reported on his involvment in Prejeans suit, but being left as opposed to Prejean being right, he begged her to come on & make her case. She made her case: but not on MSNBC. She only dropped hints mostly on right wing conservative networks (radio/TV), saying she was waiting for both an apology from the plaintiff (Olberman) or a request to make her case infront of him, but she said her people hadn't yet received such an invitation. EVEN THOUGH, OVER ON MSNBC, OLBERMAN WAS TELLING HIS VIEWERS, IF PREJEAN WAS WATCHING, HE WAS GIVING HER AN OPEN INVITATION TO COME ON.

Prejeans defamation suit disappeared from the headlines around Labor Day last yr. No word since on if she's settled her case w/ Olberman.

What I'd like to know (since it has been @ least 6 months)...

I saw no mention, on Prejeans wikipedia page, of her defamation suit against Olberman, so I'm guessing she never took the next step.

Was the case settled, or did Prejean drop the suit after fire of her controversial answer burned thru all it's fuel?

I would have loved to have seen the end of it. But seeing how there hasn't been any word since last Labor Day, she must have dropped the charges. She must have realized how ridiculous that idea was. She had to. Otherwise, she is a posterchild for how effective the right wing is @ "closing the book" on issues.

Later

Things I heard on fag left wing news journalist Rachel Maddows show

2010-08-09T18:55:00.000-07:00

She says that right wing conservative congressmembers are willing to pass tax cuts for "The American People" but not willing to appropriate funding to give a "booster shot" to our ailing & failing national public school system. She asked whatever republican congressmember might be watching (I'd guess less than 5) who do they mean by "The American People"? I feel she is suggesting that the american people the GOP is refering to are the members & owners of the companies from the states where these GOP public officers are selling their vote on low corporate, payroll, & business taxes.

Since I am a white liberal dem there really aren't any politicains who I can vote for who will stand for what I stand for. Low, corporate, payroll & business taxes are fine, but I want a white liberal dem from SC to stand up against the 16th amendment, Affirmative Action, Anti-Union laws, bring back legal slavery like we had here 150 yrs ago. Yes, I know all this, @ this pt, is unachieveable. But Rachel Maddow showed how long it took for federal laws demanding equal rights to women as well as men to be made a reality. Yes it took 70 yrs, & yes, less than 20% of the original supportors of those rights are live to see it, but again, THE LAW WAS PASSED.

Having said that, that is proof that changing the US Constitution & enforcing little enforced amendment is possible, it may take half half a century, but remember, I'm one of the few American success stories who still stands & obeys laws that were enforced for nearly a century prior to repeal, & I even fought their repeal. I am true, (if labeled insane) product of American history. I enforced little known & little enforced federal laws (currently), that aren't enforced nationally & are too complex to repeal, that were enforced nationally (@ one one time in the past), but are now considered outdated to be enforced.

When Mike Pence, John Boehner, John Kyle, Eric Canter, Lindsay Graham & Joe Wilson demand that the left listen to "The American People". The American People that they're talking about are the multimillionaire owners and leadership of coal, crude oil, home loan, investment banking companies who not only give up to the federal limit to the GOP but give to PACs who then hire lobbyists to shmooze the GOP in exchange for promising "them" NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, lower taxes, higher tax cuts, rebates so they can build more factories where they can hire back layed off employees to build more products.

What do I think about that? I'm a big business, & while the GOP promises their tax cuts will help bring the economy back to life, I say, "Waiting one fucking minute. I see, hear & read business news reports about how a # of bu ig businesses are making record profits. That makes me wonder, "what will big business do w/ Pence, Boehner, Cantor, Kyle, Wilson's tax cut & rebates, if they already posted record profits?" Why aren't they going to spread that money around by hiring back the unemployed?"

Readers, you already know, over WGE's near 20 yr history, & over WE's 60 yrs, we've only perminently let go under 1000, & many of them were either w/in a decade of retiring or died by some other means besides the work place.

No, the GOP want to borrow against their's (& your childrens' future earning) to give unneccessary tax cuts & rebates to those who have already been posting continued profits.

AND THE GOP THINKS THE ECONOMY AND BIG BUSINESS IS BROKE.

Plain & simple: the majority of the GOP only want to be reelected, & they're willing to bankrupt & enslave the middle & lower class to the pt of making members of the middle class resort to risking arrest & jail time to rob small businesses & branches of big & small banks to feed their kids.

Thanks GOP, way to go to take one for America.

If I sound like I should run for office if I want to make changes, I say, where have YOU been since Y2K? I have run for every open public office seat from Columbia City Council to Lindsey Graham, Joe Wilson & Ted DeMints's senate seats running on & standing for everything I said @ the start of this post, & that I am willing to vote for in any other public office candidate. If you didn't know that, that must tell you...

I DIDN'T WIN

Why it's a safe bet not to threaten me

2010-07-24T19:42:00.000-07:00

I don't know how many of you readers subscribe to Town & Country, The Economist, Fortune, and other higher level elite American periodicals, but I do (not @ home/@ my office, mainly for those who have appoints but come too early & have to wait). I found an article in each one, chronicaling my history of dating and marrying women. Although the reporters couldn't get any witnesses to the relationships & marriages prior to the 1950s, they did report on the girls I've dated to the pt of proposing to.

Many a girl (mostly from familes worth in excess of a billion dollars) have tried to make a name for themselves by making a scene w/ me infront of the cameras, trying to embarass me. However, many of them have also found themselves in videos posted on Youtube doing things and saying things that have shamed their reputation (both personal & family). You may have seen them. After each one I have spliced in a clip of me saying, "this is what happens when my girlfriend tries to embarass me. I get even" (or something like that).

Each one confronted me about airing "our" dirty laundry on the web. To the ones who are justing dating, I offer a break up plus $2.5 million. They ask if that's all they're worth? I tell them, "that's all I'll pay to see what's in the videos on Youtube, unless you'd like to see some more?". They asked how I got the footage? I tell them, "the same way your family would get footage like that. Everyone in the middle class is interested in making more money on the side, just as long as the job doesn't involve anyone they know".

Girlfriends & ex-girlfriends aren't the only ones to threaten me: their family & friends do the same. However they all even up in the news or on Youtube doing things that would spoil their public image. What is my public image?: You threaten me, you will know how it feels. For many, when they threaten, my retaliation is usually the 1st time it happens to them. We each throw a few punches. But then I make their unethical & sometimes illegals activities known to gov agencies.

Does that make me sound g-d-like? Well I'm not, but I'm certain not mortal.

The Bart transit cop murder case out in Cal

2010-07-09T21:03:00.000-07:00

I got an email from Marcus out in Cal asking what I thought of the verdict? He's been a visitor of this site since the month or two after we met in Israel back in the wk after New Yrs last yr. He really should already know what I think of a murder case involving a white man & a nigger where the white guy initiated the act.

I'm not surprised that the transit cop, Johannes Mesherle, a white armed male was not found guilty of a charge that comes w/ a sentence over 10 yrs, but instead was convicted of a charge that came w/ a one that was less than 5. I agree w/ what the victim's, Oscar Grant, family commented about the verdict: They weren't surprised either.

They only hoped the next minority to be shot to the pt of being killed by a majority WILL get justice. I doubt it. Just b/c there's a minority in the White House doesn't mean the times are changing. This pres will most likely be only a hiccup. However, I am willing to eat my words if he wins reelection in '12.

These people just don't know how to do it

2010-06-28T16:07:00.000-07:00

There is a recurring report on Fox News.com, NPR.com, Nightly.msnbc.com and other news sites talking about how sad the situation is in this country. What I mean is, those people who are too poor, to pay for channels that air how really good & really clever bank robberies are pulled off on Hollywood crime dramas, or in the films that have come out of the city, really have no idea how to do it.

I am sure that these kinds of people are among those who would have wished I had also been suckered into refiancing my "home loan" w/in 6 months of making the last payment towards permanent ownership, before ending up in a loan that 6 months after signing onto it, the payments 1st doubled then tripled. I have to agree w/ something the late comedian George Carlin & HBO late night talk show host Bill Maher must have said some time in the last 5 yrs: most- middle and lower-class Americans are fucking stupid.

Am I wrong? If I am explain all the personal sad news stories from the national forclosure crisis. Either Amerians are stupid & suckers, or they really believed the home loan modifier they had worked w/ was being honest w/ them. Many were, but also, many of the businesses those home loan refinancer worked for closed shop one by one between 2007 and 2009. The people who get into the news for ATTEMPTING, (almost none were successful) to rob banks, were found out when they, as truly religious people, asked the teller to pray to Jesus to forgive them for what they were about to do.

The teller didn't pray w/ them, they triggered the silent alarm. If they felt for the robber they should have given them $50-100 free then leave. Unless THEIR job @ the bank was on the line. These robbers really didn't want to rob the bank, but many explained to the press that they only needed the money to buy food. Well, why commit a crime (rob a bank) to do something legal (buy food), when ya'll could just steal the food? That is what doesn't make sense to me.

Again, Carlin & Maher must have had it right: Americans...are more religious...than smart. These reports prove it.

The Tea Party Movement has a similar stench to the Whig Party of the 1850s; I'll elaborate...

2010-06-10T11:33:00.000-07:00

I have yet to find any other immortals as old as I, so I'm guessing that none of you have a lot of knowledge pertaining to the party that elected a # of people to public office and even one to the presidency. They lasted for most of the 1850s. In the months prior to my & my familys' lynching, my father wrote to the president asking, & then begging, for protection from his NC equivalent, who was throwing threats of corporate sabotage and undercutting his businesses prices (@ a time when things like that were not only unregulated but were legal. This wouldn't change until Muckrakers like Ida Tarbell would literarily demand my now former employer John D. Rockefellers, head on a plater after she lost her father to suicide when he couldn't compete w/ Standard Oil in the 1st & 2nd decade of the last century).

The party that put private citizen into public office & a private citizen into the White House, then burned out after their nominees term ended was the Whig Party. They were able to do the same thing todays Tea Party has been able to do: put private citizens into public office. They survived long enough to put Zachary Taylor into office in the yr after my family was murdered. What I see similar in todays Tea Party, is that the Whigs flame burned out very soon after Zachary Taylor's term. After seeing Rand Paul being elected by the Tea Party into public office, I am willing to place a $50 million bet, w/ anyone willing to take it, on the party nominating someone akeen to the Whigs Taylor to the presidency in '12.

What do ya'll think? Do you agree that Rand Paul is indeed the 1st step towards a Tea Party presidential nominee? A Zachary Taylor of the Tea Party? Post a comment.

In My Opinion...

2010-05-23T16:24:00.000-07:00

Those 3 words cost people a lot of $$$ when it comes to mine. Since G-d's agent or representative repeatedly drops hints, about coming events he, she or it overhears G-d saying about mortal man, every time I see him, her or it. That happens @ least twice a month when some dick tests my immortality. Unfortunetaly they don't see me wake up until the next day. By then they usually have forgotten that they thought they killed me the day before.

B/c I hear all kinds of insider info during my relatively short time in the afterlife, I am able to manipulate mortal man into do things that will benefit me. For example, I learn when the next massive, 120+ pt, drop in the stock market happens. Can't tell you what I do when that happens, it takes an ethically challenged individual not to react to news like that. Or predicting when nations will get into, what the late comic George Carlin called, "a big prick waving fight". I usually stay out of it, as per the agreement between G-d & myself.

I can't get involved in mortal issues; b/c I'm not mortal (I find myself needing to say that again & again) Mortals just can't get their head around the idea that there is someone out there in la la lan who is not like them. America officially refuses to accept my belief (even w/ the mountain of evidence, fact that I have no heart beat, or that I have been declared officially dead @ least twice a month.

However, between themselves, they would like to do to me what Brent Spiner's character, in the film Independence Day, did to creatures that did not look, sound or act human. Or what happened to the alien refugees in the film District 9. Or what happened to the mutants that wanted to be left alone but for the abilities that manifested @ puberty & expressed themselves when the persons emotions got the best of them; that kept other humans @ arms length in the Marvel comics X-Men Trilogy.

Ya'll know what happened. If you don't, rent them. Good films. Don't have to be nerd to watch them. Although I'm so far the only immortal to come out of the closet, I am more than 50 confident that there are other immortals out there. Only, like homosexuals, too afraid to come clean & stand up for themselves & demand acceptance from haters none believer.

Most of you probably don't know this & wouldn't believe me even if I told you, or maybe you wouldn't doubt that something like this would happen: Uncle Sam repeatedly tries to use the accidental killing of alleged innocent mortal lives as reason to take me to a military complex & test me. To see how my immortality can be used as a weapon against rogue nations. Or perhaps to clone me: I'm not mortal. Gives Uncle Sam justification to clone me.

Mortal man has never had someone like me fighting for them. But I refused to do it. I was returned to the living for one reason: to be G-d right hand. Not that right hand, perverts. I mean in the Biblical sense. In return for keeping my vow to my dead family, after being killed by wanted ot not yet acknowledged murderers, I will deal w/ those gulity of the sin of repeated murder, faster than old age, disease, or death by another mortal will send them to hell.

That may make me no better than the people I have been accused of killing, but don't forget, the murder rate from 1970 to 2010. How low has the rate dropped b/c of the murderers deaths, & the rumor that Jeremi Wilks will find you if you plan to murder 2 or more people or have already done so & still walk among the free & innocent? Maybe Uncle Sam should think the one he accuses of murder for lower the national murder rate.

Again, that's just my opinion. & my opinion is valuable.

I'M BAAACCCKKK! & I need to say something

2010-05-22T16:24:00.000-07:00

I know I've been gone for nearly a month, but I'm guessing many of you have not had time to come read. I really had nothing to say about very much over the last month. There wasn't really anything ridiculous enough to bash or criticize. The gulf oil situation over in Louisiana? We now know BP had been told repeatedly & warned repeatedly about what they were doing w/ the Deep Sea Horizon.

Although BP still thinks they aren't to blame for the mess. They pted fingers @ the other investors of the platform who had invested equiptment into it in exchange for an expected multimillion or billion dollar profit in the future. Besides that, BP should cover it's employees financial & medical expenses until BP can get them onto another job in their company. If the platform employees wish to speak out on what happened, BP should not force them to sign an agreement to refrain from suing if in the future they contracted an illness that, corraberated by an MD, is found to have developed from the explosion.

Next topic, & the one I wanted to get to today: I saw on Brian Williams last night he reported o the results of Texas' school board new K-12 social studies text bks, for the 2010-11 school yr. Did any of you hear about that decision? It just warms my cockals. Texas school board rewriting history to better promote America as being founded on Christian conservativism. Thomas Jefferson is out & the slave trade was morphed into the Atlantic Triangle Trade. They also changed the idea that the colonists came here, not for religious freedom, but to spread Christianity.

Many a nigger politician over there criticized the school board for leaving the fact, that this country tolerated slavery for 120 yrs (1750-1870), out of next yrs American History lectures. My opinion? I'm glad that the story is now being told from the side of the losers: white southern liberal Democratic men, like me. I'm sure the segment is now on Youtube go check it out. I'd heard about it over the last few weeks, and read about it in TIME.

As soon as Brian started on the segment I DVRed it. I loved hearing the fact that the losers of the Civil War, Reconstruction and the owners of King Cotton here in the Deep South & SC were finallty being acknowledged.

If any of ya'll disagree, comment. I'd love to hear from you. More later.

Interviews I've given...

2010-04-30T12:28:00.000-07:00

I'm not talking about the ones I've given on FNC (Fox News). I'm talking about the On The Records, uncensored ones I've given to the media, during the breaks in the times when reports of affirmative action-violations, vehicular homicides, and disconnected case action lawsuits against me for murder drift thru the news. I'm talking about when I'm promoting films I make & making appearances for business deals.

I talk to a range of the young (I have yet to talk w/ anyone who, although they claim to be older, is actually older than I). Most of them addimently beleieve that I AM GUILTY of the murders I have been accquited of committing. Most offer me (off the record) alot of money to confess to the murders. When I ask how much they're boss is willing to shell out for the confession, they say "name your price". Once I give them my price, they ask what I plan to do w/ the money? I've said, to renovate the Confederate History Museums of the Deep South.

A few have come back w/ "it won't cost that much, I would think". I agree, but what would they think I would do w/ the money? They thought I would spend the money on my lifestyle.

Getting back, all the journalists asked me about why I thought I hadn't been targeted by now by someone rich & corrupt. I asked where have they been since all this drama started? I've been directly involved in murder of some kind or another @ least once a month since all this drama has started. I tell them to Google Mafia hitlists (if there is such a site online) to see if I'm on it. I haven't checked, but I am quite confident that out of all the murder victims, there had to be one who was legally or blood related to the mob.

When they ask me how I know, I tell them that, back in the 1990s, perodically I was told, upon waking up after dying, by the County Conor how the authorities found me & the scenes were & looked mob related. I have also seen interviews of former mob hitmen who got out of the business who freely admited that they quit the business after seeing me walking about the next wk. They said they went to their moss & said they saw Jeremi Wilks walking about like nothing happened to him. Like what "we" did to him had no effect on his psychie or body.

Reporters also asked what I thought of the publics perception that since I have repeatedly denied involvment in the murder of those I have been accused of killing, I was the killer. They also add that they've seen me being asked that same question & they've asked if I hav grown tired of being asked? I say no, America has a terrible long term memory, but great short term.

I've also been asked if I feel remorse for the murders. Remorse? I haven't killed anyone! This is what I tell every reporter who interviews me. I ask them what I need to be remorsful for? They say the murders I committed. @ this pt, I chuckle & rearrange my 280 lb frame in the chair. This movement makes the report usually ask, if that question makes me uncomfortable. I have always said, never, and then I explain why.

B/c there have been reporters who have asked me that question going back 30 yrs. Then I repeat the fact that not every generation since the 70s & not every American or every person who discovers me for the 1st time knows that 90% or more the reports who interview me, ask that question. There will be some people, I am willing to donate a billion dollars to the charity of the persons choice, if they can find more than 10 people, worldwide, who don't have an opinion, whether or not, the next time I deal w/ a case action lawsuit for murder brought about 40 families, I should be found guilty but not get yrs in prison, but get capito punishment.

There are people out there on this planet who won't have an opinion of whether I should be killed for whatever I did. They'll ask, who the fuck is he? There are millions out there who have no fucking clue who I am, or whether they should have an opinion on how long I should be free or be alive. As a multiple side note, the debate over whether I am alive or dead is still up for debate.

When that question comes up, I tell them to collect their proof that I am indeed guilty, make an appointment w/ me to show me, in front a DA so they can prove it. Otherwise, I can choose to either end the interview b/c I don't like them b/c they're a minority, or a woman, or I usually ask for the next question. They sometimes ask if I am angered by it? I tell them no, absolutley not. I am just as offended by the # of times that question is asked as Congressman Barney Frank is offended by people calling him a fag of a kyke. He, & I, would just say, small, undereducated minds, think like that.

@ that pt, the reporter is giving off the air that they are offended by what I am saying & end the interview themselves, saying, "thanks for giving us some time to speak w/ you". I have stopped asking if the reporter is offended by what I have said (I usually read the interview later online and read the posted comments later), I learned that 20 yrs ago, after hearing the reporter's take on the interview when they're interviewed by someone else. They are usually offended by what I have to say.

America is not like it used to be. Especially here in the deep south. Hardly any of the racist, ageist, sexist bigots here in SC or anywhere in the south are liberal dems. Sad I think.

More later.

Saw a report on Brian Williams Nightly News last night...

2010-03-19T09:01:00.000-07:00

Ann Curry was hosting the show. It involved the 1st lady promoting her healthy kids initiative, "Get Moving", or something like that. There were a number of stats used to back up her project. 2/3s of all American kids are extremely obese. I got an email from Marcus from out in Cal who reminded me of the piece, asking me to make my case for the problem.

It takes me back to the entry I made a couple wks ago after seeing the PBS program NOW doa piece on the documentary Food, Inc. My case for the national epidemic is: parents need to parent their kids & not be "push-overs" when it comes to the future health of their kids. I may not want to hire fat people only to end up paying higher premiums for their future health problems.

I am not mad @ the fast food industry, who industrialize the animals who end up turning into the cheap food that poor Americans eat; I'm angry @ the parents of these kids, who don't want to alienate their kids. BULL-FUCKING-SHIT. You think your kids are alienated from you now for not letting them smoke, get high, or have sex before they turn 16, you should talk to the grown up version of those kids who are estranged from their parents, saying they [their parents] should have bene more strict w/ them as children.

Like Brad Pitts character said Ed Nortons character in the film "Fight Club", something like, "I will carry you, kicking & screaming, & in the end you will thank me". Parents don't want to alienate their kids Parents, you need to be the parent & demand that your child maintains a healthy weight until they move out, but even AFTER they move out, whenever you see or talk to them, promote to no end that living a healt lifestyle will extend their life.

They may not want to live to 70, 80, or 90, but if they're physically and mentaly healthy by then, they will not be able to thank you enough for what you did for them. They may alienate you now, but if you leave them to their nature, I guarantee you, they will end up hating you for not being the parents once they hit 25-30. I was the exact same way w/ Eric [my son], although my method would be labelled as illegal, it worked & I hae been praised for what I did w/ him, they all want to know what I did.

I can't tell them, b/c what I did, I don't know any parent who would go to that point. I didn't lie doing either, I don't like kids, so what I did would not be ethical, so if any of you want to know what I did, email me; I will not post it here.

About the national childhood obesity epidemic, I don't blame fast food corporations, I blame parents. Parents are not being parents if childhood obesity is as big as it is. Parents are leaving theri kids in natures care, & now you see what you get.

But some would argue that in this recession, fast food is the most affordable thing. Well. Parents, try cold cereal & milk, or a few fruits for breakfast. If you can't afford milk, use water. Tuna or peanut butter & jelly sandwiches for lunch. Have another sandwich for dinner or have a cheap tv dinner. No more caffine or energy drinks. That is part of the problem. There, you have some ideas to get started.

They want to eat fast food? No. Who's in-charge of this family? The kids? Sounds like it.

Tonight are the Oscars

2010-03-07T10:21:00.001-08:00

Yes I made a film last yr. It was set in 30s Las Vegas, during the time when I was gone from SC public view & the mob's Benjamin Segal was getting funding from them to build an oasis in the Nevada desert that hardly any of his funders was solidly behind. I played Segals bodyguard/ muscle who just so happened to be from here in SC.

It was considered fictional by the MPAA although I ademantly rejected that. I said I recalled the 30s, but the board said that since I have been the only proclaimed immortal around, they have no evidence to prove that I had witness America in the 30s. Be that as it may, they said they had made their decision on in what genre they would put my film. The film, titled, When The Mob 1st Got Rich, was given an [R] rating after I refused to heed suggestions to remove some scenes that would have lowered the rating to @ least PG-13 which would have increased the potential audience numbers.

I told them that removing particluar scenes from the film would cost the film its authenticity, which caused the board to tell me to leave that part out when promoting it online, on TV or over the radio. They didn't want to touch my "immortality-status" belief w/ a 10' pole. The film cost about a quarter of a billion to make, & made about double that. I got emails about how realistic "Mob" looked & whether or not it was true since they'd read, in the paper & online, that the film was put in the historical-fiction category?

I am here to say that Mob is true & accurate. I have newpaper clippings of The Commission (Meyer Lansky, Benjamin Segal, Charles Luciano) buying, & building on, land in the southern Nevada desert back then. I won't confirm or deny whether I actually worked as Segals bodyguard back then, but I will say that Segal & the commissions work in Las Vegas was being done while I was on my way to Hollywood where, in the late 30s, I, just randomly, starred in my 1st film, which won my 1st, of now 10 statuettes, @ the 10th annual Oscars.

Saw tonights episode of NOW on PBS

2010-03-05T19:54:00.000-08:00

I hadn't seen FOOD INC. yet. But I had heard of it. Saw the clips of it on the show tonight. All I can say is, "I figured as much". The either "nearly half a billion" or "over a billion" dollars the food companies spend annually to maintain their ability to sell cheap crappy foods to those who can't afford to buy food that is undeniably & arguably more healthy just goes to show exactly the reverse of what the "gvnr" character, in the 2nd & 3rd Pirates of the Caribbean films, said about the currency of the British Empire:

The currency to get things done in both the British Empire as well as American gov is "no longer loyalty, but currency". It's all about how much one is willing to spend on public officials to get what they want legal legal. I'm guessing that is how I have been able to beat murder charges for the last 35 yrs: Politicians were willing to take good financial advise for keeping loop holes that grant acquiitals for murder to allow me to stay out of prison (or worse, according several opinions in The States editoral pg, death row).

I don't own any fast food franchises (McDs, Wendys, Burger King, Taco Bell, Sonic, In-N-Out Burger wouldn't let a fellow billionaire to make money off a copy of their product). I haven't eaten fast food since the grandkids, of a couple of my former USC MBA program mates, developed Type 2 Diabetes after 15 yrs of drs discovered that eating the crap 4-5 days a wk was the cause.

I hope more than 275 million of you out there will view your future health, not current, reason enough to exchange diet & exercise for cheap crappy food high in sugar & stuff you can't pronounce the name of in order to beat the food companies @ a game that should have been easy for you since you had the choice to buy into their marketing & pr.

Good night America. Talk to you soon.

Hi people

2010-03-04T16:13:00.000-08:00

Why I've been gone since 2/20 is b/c, as you may have read in TheState less than a wkk after the newest entry, I was supposedly "killed" in a head on collision w/ a couple USC undergrads who were out that night. Yes my ferrari was totaled (so was the other car). The boys in the other car were killed instantly. You probably saw my totalled car (& unconcious body) WIS TV.

What the CSI found was that all 4 boys were intoxicated & had elevated levels of narcotics in their systems. But what the news didn't say (as I later saw in a clip posted on Youtube) was that the boys were playing chicken with me that night.

I was on my way home from work that night when the boys stopped next to me @ a light, IDed me, & asked when the last time a mortal killed me? I told them last month (January). The boy driving challenged me to prove that I was immortal. The light turned green, we drove ahead thry 2 green lights to the next red one. When the boys pulled up I said I just wanted to make it home.

They said home can wait, we wanna play. I said no. When the light turned they burned rubber getting ahead of me to the next light. They asked if I was chicken? I told them if they wanted to test my immortality they all may end up dead too. They all laughed in drunkeness & said they;d take that chance. I told them they were all drunk & high & should get back to the house where they lived.

They told me I sounded like their parents. They said, they'd come to USC to get away from parents. They said they wanted to play. The light turned, they again burned rubber getting ahead of me. But I turned onto a side street to get away from them so I wouldn't have to prove my immortality. Something like this happened last Dec. I was having a really hard time proving to the children (if I killed one or both of their parents) or the parents (if I killed their child) that it wasn't my fault that their parents or childre had been killed, they must have been drunk or high when we met.

When I got to another street & got back on my way I hoped I'd lost the boys. 3 streets after that, the boys reappeared coming in my direction. They quickly started picking up speed as I remained @ a city limit, honking intermittently until the crash. The next thing I knew I was back in some office lobby. I recognized the scene. It was the almightlys representatives office. After 10 min I was called into an office that looked like a shrinks office. I saw the rep & explained why I was back.

He told me to lay down on the couch, he came up to me saying, I hope the next time we see each other I won't have to sent you back. Then he gave me a hard slap & the next thing I knew I was in the dark. I hit everywhere in the dark until a light appeared @ my feet, I was pulled down into the light & discoverd that I was @ the morgue. The dr said "I wondered when you'd wake up. You have a shit-load to answer for those boys deaths." I told the man they wanted to play, not me. He said not his problem.

Told me my clothes were in the other room, get dressed & get out before the media finds you alive & not right-headed @ the moment. So I did. The rest is history, as seen on TV (& Youtube).

Law Abiding Citizen just came out on dvd this wk

2010-02-20T18:20:00.000-08:00

I had completely forgotten about. I credit Marcus from out in Cal w/ not forgetting about it. He emailed me to say that, after watching it himself, the Gerard Butler (of 300 fame) character reminded him of what I have been going thru since 1980; although (he pted out) he could only recall as far back as the late 90s.

After I heard from him, I recalled how alike I thought the lead character was to me. I stopped by a local Best Buy today to pick up the dvd. Unlike many people, who need protection from those who really don't like them & would like to "take them behind the barn & have them shot" but don't want to deal w/ the consequences, I don't need protection to keep from being killed. The American public seen just as much tv footage of me dead & on my back 1 day & standing & walking around like normal the next, as they have seen of 9/11 photos.

People who remember witnessing 9/11, OJ Simpsons Trial or Bill Clinton's appeachment & acquital should be able to hear that I had been killed by someone or killed in an accident by now to not believe yesterday was my last day; that I would come back if I wanted to.

I called Eric & Katie from the car (before I even got in) to say I hadn't seen them in awhile (since last wk), had just bought Law Abiding Citizen & wanted to see it w/ them. They both told me they had their own lives to live now. I told them I may die soon. They reminded me that that idea worked when they were both teens but after seeing me die one day & come back to life the next, they told me they were willing to bet their share of my life insurance policy that that wouldn't be the last time I said that.

I asked them what they had planned this afternoon? They said stuff. I asked what kinds? They said just stuff. I said if it's just stuff, & not needed for a job (for Eric) or to pass a test in a class (for Katie) it could wait a few hrs. Both (after a long loud exaggerated sign) said fine. We met @ the house to watch it in the private screening room where I watch the final cut of the films Reflections (my film studio) makes prior to distribution. I had a good time (w/ my kids) they had already seen it when it came to theatres last fall.

Afterwards we went to lunch @ one of the restaurants I own, I got updated on how they were doing, we went thru what we thought of the film. They both agreed that Gerarad Butlers character reminded them of what I have been going thru the last 25 yrs. Although, my story has yet to end in me dying upon the completion of a murder. I have a trial date coming in 2 wks for a class action lawsuit for murder from the state of Louisiana.

I was charged w/ murdering 6 people on Black Thursday (the biggest shopping day of the yr after Thanksgiving) in mutiple locations. All the victims were found w/ evidence tying them directly to the murder of 3-4 other people going back as far as 15 yrs. Many of you may have seen me make my standard statement outside the city Superior Court a wk after the bodies were, praising the deaths; thanking whomever put those murderers in their rightful place; not in heaven but in hell.

Also, I got a lot of hell for those statements from the families of the victims, who said my saying that clearly framed me as the killer. We'll see how that holds up in court. Law Abiding Citizen? Good film. Gritty. Athough I didn't like it how Butler let Foxxes daughter see the footage of him cutting, sawing and chopping his wife & daughters kill apart. If I had indeed killed those people, I would DEFINITLY not record footage of me killing the people to their family, w/ the worry that kids under 12 might see it.

Definitly not. Other than that, the moral of the story is are defense attornies willing to allow guilty people go free in order to get others confess to their crimes (win some; lose som anyone). Is that all there is to the defense lawyer profession? I think so. That's why I got a law degree from SC back in the early 70s. You never know when a mortal will accuse you (a young billionaire) of some random shit just to see how good you are @ know the law.

Well there you have it. Law Abiding Citizen. It was a good movie. Not for everyone. & definetly no for the under 10 crowd. Too bloodly for some people. But it isn't a horror. It is a bloodly, legal, dirty political drama. More later.

Tiger Woods Apologizing; What I think

2010-02-20T08:20:00.000-08:00

This really isn't news. A male celebrity (or any mortal man) cheating on his wife? It was inevitable that he would get sloppy. For a time he thought he wouldn't get caught. So he kept going. Besides, if a marriage isn't going well, & neither partners are being satisifed in the bedroom, it would be virtually impossible for him or her to seek satisfaction elsewhere.

The issue is, in this christian society, couples are expected to work thru their problems if sex isn't being fulfilled. But in every generation since the baby boom, the idea of cheating on ones spouse, girlfriend or boyfriend if the sex isn't satisfying has gone from being taboo to "what else is new?"

Just b/c the person, who is labeled as cheating on their significant other, is famous rich person they are expected be perfect. But if you're a religiuous person you should already know that they are only human & not perfect, & give the person some lyway. I would, & I'm not even mortal.

Yes, Woods has cultivated a "Good Guy" image, but it was only a matter of time before the "magic dust" wore off. I wouldn't be so hard on him; the man's good guy image obviously ran it course & he will come back to golf. However I would be surprised & wonder what other profession he wouldn try if he didn't get back on the course before the end of the yr.

I heard he's been losinng endorsement contracts left & right since the story broke. W/ that I wonder how long his millions will last before he needs to go back to work?

On this Presidents Day, I was @ work

2010-02-15T14:32:00.000-08:00

It was the same as when I came to work on MLK Day last month. 98.5% of the buildings employees were taking the day off. My parking staff must not have red this wkends entry (noone came to park my Ferrari) I had to call security to have someone come out to park. The guy who came out ask me why I was @work today, wasn't it a holiday? I reminded the man that one would only observe the holiday if they respected the presidents the holiday was set aside to honor: Lincoln & Washington.

I don't think much of Washington (1st pres & all) but I refuse to honor Lincoln b/c he declared all out war on slavery across the nation, including here in the south. As many of you out there should know from history class the south lost that war. I will never forgive him for doing it. However, I do respect the southerner who had the balls to stand up for his fellow southerner & literally cut Lincoln down to size, & I will be taking off work for HIS birthday when it comes later this yr: John Wilkes Booth.

I paraphrazed most of all that for the security guard. All he said was, "OK, sir" & got into the drivers seat as I walked inside & he parked.

More later.

Re: the memorial yesterday that some people observed

2010-02-13T14:13:00.000-08:00

How many of you out there observed Lincolns birthday yesterday & didn't go to work? I heard on NPR yesterday that the markets would be open. Hardly any schools were open yesterday, but I don't think it was b/c of the man's birthday. I think it was b/co the deep south was expecting to get alot of snow, but as ETV radio later reported, it wasn't like up northwho got a couple feet. We less than a foot.

But back to the reason for this entry. I was expecting business to be closed yesterday: it was Lincolns birthday wasn't it? Will w e be honoring him on Monday? I went to work thinking the former. Once I got to work, I saw that my hunch wasn't right. The employee parking garage was filling up & people were walking in hold Starbucks coffee. Once I got to the B.D. (board of directors) entrance, I asked th kid who came out to park the car, why people were @ work?

He told me it was just another day. I asked when Lincolns birthday is? He said February 12th. I told him today was February 12th. He said the country may observe his birthday on Monday, on Presidents Day. I nodded & walked inside. Later that morning I searched for the mans birthday on the web. The search engine directed me to Wikipedia's Abraham Lincolns page. I found there more than half way down the page that the mans birthday was never set aside as a national holiday.

However, next Monday was set aside as Presidents Day, to observe both Lincolns & Washingtons birthday. I guess I will be going to work next Monday as well not only to get some work done, but also to see, if any, how many WGE employees will be observing Lincolns birthday & not go to work.

About observing Lincolns birthday: I put that kind of observance in the same category I put Martin Luther King's birthday. I don't plan to pay respect to him. The man broke laws, that @ the time were common place laws, in the late 1850s, in order to force my souths hand into ending slavery here & bring the region into the union. Not only that but I still, even today, give negros, the same respect I was raised and taught to give them from childhood in the 1820s and 30s. Take from that what you will. I will talk to you later.

Hey North Atlantic Seaboard, I've got a question

2010-02-11T12:23:00.000-08:00

You know, locales from DC, up to New England, has been seeing more snow than it came recall getting. Does that sway your opinion on weather change @all? It may not be global warming, but that's b/c we're in winter. Once May-September season comes, the extreme heat will return, w/ every yr the weather getting more & more extreme. Recall, it is February, it is typically cold @ this time of yr, only the cold hasn't been this bad before.

I am willing to make a small bet, w/ any of you, that this coming summer, the heat will be more brutal than last yr. It was triple digits last summer, I am sure the heat will gain a few more degrees this summer. The environment is simple gettign tired of mankind messing w/ the equalibrium of nature. Being dead, I don't have to worry about being killed by nature.

If the time is right, I will not come back. But for the rest of you, ya'll, pro-lifers are already sold on staying alive, & try very hard NOT TO DIE. The problem w/ that is: mankind is no match for mother nature. As the weather gets more & more extreme, mortal members fo mankind will die. It really is too late for ya'll to try & fix the problem. The earth is already over the hump where it was safe to try cool the planet down.

Over the next 80 yrs, the weather (combined w/ the power of mother nature) will continue to take no prisoners & the mortal body count will start to build up when the mortal body looses its fight against hypothermia (in winter) & extreme dehydration (in summer). Until then, keep making jokes about how crazy the weather is. IT AIN'T NO JOKE. People will start dying from the extreme weather. You really are too late to fix it.

Difference between MSNBC & FNC? Big word usage

2010-02-07T11:07:00.000-08:00

Have you watched Keith Olberman, Chis Matthews, Rachel Maddow Dylan Ratigan? How often have you had to go get a dictionary, or go online find out what a word means? How often have you heard people on the talk shows on MSNBC asking experts to explain information to them in "laymen's terms"? How about on FNC? I see a big difference. I hear on FNC, people asking the experts to explain in laymens terms.

I'd like to know if the talk shows hosts on FOX are not smart enough to understand technical jargon, or are able to explain current issues in big words. Don't believe me? Watch 15-30 mins of an MSNBC talk show then compare to 15-30 mins of FOX. Comment on this entry if you still don't accept this. Another issue I have w/ Fox that I don't have w/ MSNBC is people don't shout over each other. People are allowed to speak then, other people start in.

When I went on Glenn Beck, O'Reilly Factor, On the Record, Hannity, they all wanted to interrupt me. If you saw any of those episodes, they all wanted to get the upper hand on me. Reminds me of when kyke fag congressman Barney Frank went on the O'Reilly Factor. They were yelling @ each other for nearly half the show. Bill commented on it for a couple episodes thereafter.

I was exactly the same way. When I went on several talk shows on FOX, we both (beck, o'reilly, Sustren, hannity) were yelling @ each other. They said we were running out of time halfway thru the show. I told them they should have scheduled more time. I told them they would have to edit the segment if they said that, & that would be sending the wrong message to their viewer as to what I stood for.

Right now, as I write this, I also have FNS (Fox News Sunday) on & listening to Chris Wallace interviewing Sarah Palin. She really sounds like many conservatives, people who are not smart enough to speak as eloquently as our current colored president. She sounds like Gov Bush when he was running the country for 8 yrs. Not recalling American history enough to not repeat it. Bush did that. I think Sarah Palin would do it if she won.

Yes, she's a hometown girl. But that won't mix, w/o threatening, w/ foreign nations who say, unless you fight for what you want, you won't make progress. Bush was good for not backing down. That is one thing he was good @. He did not back down (even if what he stood up strongly for was not in a liberal dems interest). His "take no bull shit" would be of good use to Obama & Clinton concerning our nonstop threats to Iran while Iran continues the process of setting up a nuclear weapons stockpile.

What would Bush done in Obamas place? The same thing he did to Iraqis leader flatten the country. He just bombed the wrong country (in the view of a liberal dem). He bombed Iraq (& not Iran). Obama is trying to be bipartisan, & he surprised that congress is rejecting his pleas. He sounds like he's in the wrong profession. He's expecting the same thing House speaker Palosi asked for when she won her seat: Partnership not Partisanship.

Is not going to happen. Congress right now is not in the mood for partnership.

I go back to the difference between the intellectual- & educated-level of MSBCs and FNCs audience: more big words & no need to break down talk for lay people on MSNBC; & needing to break down information for lay people who don't know big smart words on Fox. What does that say about FNCs audience?

As Fox preaches: I report; you decide.

February is Black History Month? Fuck

2010-02-07T09:04:00.000-08:00

We here in the south should not have let this declaration, back in 1926, carry water. Blacks were better off not becoming voters. Fredrick Douglass, Dred Scott, Harriet Tubeman, Martin Luther King; all gave impossible hope to coloreds between 1850 and 1960. I have been questioning the legitamacy of honoring niggers during the month of February, whenever it comes up. I have seen how the American perspective of the negro has changed since King was murdered.

It has become politically incorrect to be what I was raised to be back in the antebellum south. People over 50 ask me what kind of parents I had when I challenge them on the current state of the negro. They don't even like it when I called "blacks" by that name. They call it racist. They say I need to join the rest of the souuh is showing respect to how far the black man and woman has come since Reconstructon in the 1870s and Civil Rights in the 1960s.

I challenge by saying how do you know the life of the negro would be worse had Lincoln not become president? Had he not given the emancipation proclamation (I don't put the documents title in CAPS b/c I don't think it deserves the respect it has been given over the last half century)? Had MLK, Rosa Parks not rose up? What would the life of the negro be now? None of them want to picture it. They sa it is too painful to imagine.

I don't thing so. I guess that says alot about how and when I was raised. You can see it in all the Affirmative Action lawsuits that have been filed against me over the history of WGE for blatentyl violating racial, gender, and wage discrimation laws. I'm sure many of you have red, heard or seen how I have challenged the laws of today. People have said it has been shocking how racist I am. Don't I think it's not politically correct?

I've said, you were raised differently from me. Go ahead & judge me for how I was raised. But don't get mad when I challenge you on how you were raised. I thought America doesn't judge others views? If you disagree, I suggest you take another look @ the Consitution to see what you as an American should stand for. I will not be honoring negros this month. They don't deserve it. Recall: the Constitution says a black man is 3/5s of a white man.

Will you not honor the Constitution, word for word? I guess then, I don't have to take your opinion of me seriously.

More later.

Tonight is the inaugural Tea Party Movement convention

2010-02-06T16:40:00.000-08:00

It's being held in Nashville. I would like to fly up to challenge the policies and stance the partiers hold. Ask any of them if, they are loyal southerners, would they be willing to sign a petition to establish John Wilkes Booths birthday as a national holiday. If conservatives can to honor the would-be 99th birthday of Ronald Reagan and not being called a right wing conservative, I can honor Booths birthday w/o anyone calling me a racist. Doesn't that sound fair?

I'm willing to donate a billion dollars to the movement if they can last until Obama is up for reelection to see if they can pull another "Whig-style Zackary Taylor". If they don't, well I get to bash them & the rest of their ultra conservative wannabes for going the way of the Whigs, Know-Nothings, Half-Breeds, Federalists, Antifederalist, Dixiecrats, (I can go on and on). I just want to drive my point home here.

On the State of the Union: Well, I was disappointed

2010-01-28T17:04:00.000-08:00

Wilson didn't talk out of turn, nor did any other republican. Plus, any time Obama pushed for something right wingers didn't want and left wingers did, you could easily tell who supported what. Like I said in the title, my hope for someone to be noticed for speaking out about something Obama will promise in the next yr didn't happen.

Although I heard on MSNBCs Dylan Ratigan show that although he wasn't heard, it was noted that chief justice Roberts quietly shook his head and mouthed "not true" to a comment Obama made about his disappointment over a decision decided by the court. Besides him, not that much individual disapproval from any member of congress. I guess someone learned their lesson.

More later.

I have a challenge to any conservative who will be present @ tonights State of the Union address

2010-01-27T17:19:00.000-08:00

I want to see if any of them (or you, if you're a conservative politician, & if you are, make yourself known so we can talk) will have the balls to do a repeat of what our very own hometown boy Joe Wilson did last time our colored pres went before Congress to explain what he planned to do. As we can see now, he has almost completely failed @ everything he promised. Many have given his work on so many issues low grades.

HEY BLACK AMERICA, STILL THINK OBAMA IS THE MESSIAH?

How many conservatives will have the "sunflower seeds" to pull another "Joe Wilson" this time?

More later.

Been seeing US military personnel down in Haiti; what they WEREN'T WEARING made me question something

2010-01-21T10:39:00.000-08:00

I don't know if any of you saw what they weren't wearing; as opposed to what US military personnel wear in Iraq/Afghanistan: protection (bullet proof vests, helmuts, knee pads). I also heard that our boys & girls, men & women in uniform down there were only sent as peace keeper. I'm thinking: why? & then I got my answer: fights have been routinely been braking out between young male Haitians over food & water. They all hungry & thirsty. That is, according to the national news, the ONLY REASON why our people are down there: to keep the peace.

What made me question that scenario is: well, what are our people doing over Iraq & Afghanistan, if not to do just that: keep the peace. Why are our boys & girls, men women over i Iraq & Afghanistan getting protection? To keep from getting hurt of angry people there. Well, I'd say there are angry people down in Haiti as well, if only out of hunger & thirst. But not only that; medical help, coming from the leading nation that has donated medical supplies, food & water, (United States) compared to the rest of the the planets nations, is slow in coming, even though they say the situation is extremely complex.

Haiti only has one airstrip & the US is working as fast as it can to build another one. All the while supplies and aid from the worlds nations is stuck in a bottle neck @ the single airstrip @ their tiny airport.

But I need to get back to the reason for this entry: What makes protecting oneself from the possibility of being injured by an Iraqi or Afghan, while also keeping the peace, any different from keeping the peace in Haiti among fights to the pt of death or injury braking out on a daily basis over food & drink? Why don't our kids down in Haiti get the same protection from hungry & thirsty haitians who start fighting w/ rocks and machettes like our kids in Iraq & Afghanistan? Both are willing to get hurt or even die for something (Iraqis=kick America out of their country/Haitians=hunger & thirst). Answer me that Uncle Sam?

On MLK's birthday, where am I?

2010-01-18T12:01:00.000-08:00

I searched a # of search engines in hopes of finding some kind of art that I could use to state my pt on that boys birthday. It seems this country is really trying to get passed that time in it's history (among the many reasons why I AM @ work today). Having elected a young nigger into an office more suited to a respectable white man, I can see that I will be going no where fast w// what I stand for.

As I said here last wk, I will not the observing the boys birthday (I can't see myself raising a nigger up to the level of "man") I came in to work. Only the cleaning crew were here. Only a couple newbees (new WGE employes been on the job less than a yr) asked why I was coming in? I had their superior tell them in front of me so I could their expression.

Once they werer told they, siad, "sir, that's racist". I told them that what's racist is allowing, for the 1st time, a nigger to take the office of president of the United States. No other time in this countries history has that been allowed. He asked if i'd voted for Obama. I told him now that he knows where I stand on MLK, what does he think? He didn't answer. I replied "carry on", & walked to the elevator.

However, I will be taking off a day in May that has yet to be set aside as national holiday, &, come to think of t, I may just post that idea on The States website: what is it? Set aside May 10th, to pay respect to John Wilkes Booth. Since I have heard almost nothing BUT MLK on NPR (besides Haiti) today, I highy doubt my voice will be heard on that subject. I may even be called a racist. It's completely fine. I will exchange going to work today (MLKs birthday) & make an extra day of pay, for taking off work on May 10 (to honor John Wilkes Booth).

Sounds fair don't you think? After all, Many of my southern brothers, who passed in the 1st half of the last century, would be proud that one of their fellow southern brothers, was showing his respect to the man who dealt a serious blow to the northern republican cause, who were trying to whip out our southern way of life.

Couldn't listen to NPR today; all they were talking about was how awe inspiring & awesome MLK was; had to turn on classical music, Haven't had to to that since last MLK Day.

I'll go do that right now. Look for it, on thestate.com.

MLK Day is on Monday, what I plan to do that day

2010-01-15T11:31:00.000-08:00

As I did last MLK Day, I WILL be going to work Monday, as I have, historically, been able to get ahead of many of my competitors after not taking off work for the mans birthday. They had all shown (or paid) their respect to the boy, by donating their time, on that workday, to some cause or another. It has really shown how much profit a company like WGE makes when it doesn't take off work for EVERY HOLIDAY.

I got emails (& commnents) from readers of that entry last yr saying that I was a racist, a bigot & other such things. Listen, I've been called those things since the civil right era (I put civil rights in small caps b/c I don't care to give it any more importance or respect that others have already give it), & I have seen in the way of corporate profits (& my own compensation) that if I don't take off every national holiday, I do make more money, make more progress in bringing products, still in development to market, undercut my competitors; all sorts of things.

I put honoring Kings birthday in the same box, can, file (whatever you want to call it), as Lincolns birthday. Both were abolitionist, & antislavery. I don't feel that way. It ruined me, as well as my southern brothers livelihoods when 1st; slavery was abolished & 2nd; segregation was abolished. If it sounds like I am living in the past, well; there are millions across this nation who would rather live in the past than deal w/ the imperfections of the present.

Only here, & sometime on TheState.com's website, can I preach what kind of America I would like to live in.

So, now you know what I'll be doing & where I will be doing it on Monday. To hell w/ civil rights for niggers (but that's just me).

America/the worlds nations reaction to Haitis earthquake

2010-01-14T14:20:00.000-08:00

I thought we were in a recession. Where is all this aid coming from. Between mid Nov and New Yrs last yr, it was a foregone conclusion; it was obvious that the worlds economcies were going thru a recession. Then a earthquake hit Haiti, &, like magic: nations had aid (in the form of people strength, news outlets, money, food, medical assistance) to give.

Someone tell me where this aid came from? Didn't the nations countries, last month, say they had billions, possibly trillions in debt? & now they have money to give to Haiti. They sure sound like hypocrites. Yes, rebuilding Haiti will cost less than a quarter of what every country sending aid to them makes in a yr, but why have we stopped preaching how the worlds nations need to rebuilld theirs economies, now that one small nation was hit by a biblical attack by nature?

In another 3-5 months, America & the world will return to what we & they were dealing w/ last fall, & what put Haiti into the news currently will make it go the way of what put New Orleans and Indonesia into the news.

I plan to do the same as any other billionaire today: wire less than a couple million dollars to the relief programs when I could afford SEVERAL million. I earned that money. What did the nation of Haiti do to earn what some would expect a billionaire like me to donate. If you can email me w/ the names of @ last 25 billionaires (worth @ least $5.5 billion) who donated @ least $25 million to the Haiti relief funds, I will donate more.

Cheers.

Obama is famous for not wanting to look to our past for lessons to learn from

2010-01-13T10:53:00.000-08:00

He won't prosecute former Bush Admin officials, b/c then, if a conservative comes into office in '12, they will most likely look @ the Obama administration & see who they could prosecute. So prosecuting those who, according to liberal democracy, broke the law, will not be prosecuted. I like that idea. That means, Uncle Sams accusations of my murdering people in the last 25 yrs are unconstitutional. They won't look back, so my past can be removed from under the microscope. Hurrah.

Just wanted to make that pt.

States across nation are running deficits

2010-01-13T10:35:00.000-08:00

I saw on the PBS News Hr last night that a # of states across the nation are running deficits & don't know any other way to balance their budgets than to cut programs, which obviously angers voters and citizens. I have critized SC public officials for not keeping their promises to the people of "balancing the state budget" & "taking gov out of the people's business". Know what they tell me?

They ask if I'd like their job? I said, definitely. They then tell me to run in the next congressional elections. But I tell them it won't be worth it. They ask why? & I give them my pitch of what i stand for. They then say, "yeah, I agree that that wouldn't fly w/ SC or Columbia city voters". I follow that up w/, "that is why I am here critizing you, b/c I won't win your office, even if I ran". They apologize, but I tell them I don't want their pity.

I tell them if I wanted peoples pity I would have pled guilty to the 1st murder charges I was accused of back in the late 70s. Again, "if I wanted the peoples pity". But I don't. I tell them that I will go around the statE & explain to people that the only way for state officials to balance the budget was to raise taxes. I know they would immediately turn it down. I would tell them then, to stop complaining about funding to public programs being cut partially or fully.

They [the publicly funded programs] won't run properly if taxes aren't raised. If you're angry over Uncle Sam borrowing money from China, to pay for programs formerly funded by Americans, but you refuse to agree to income tax raises, then you really are a hypocrite. You can't have the ckae & eat it too, unless you pay for it. That's your problem.

How would you propose we pay for the public programs that many of you use? Borrow from China? We already do that. What else. I say we raise taxes. But you don't want to do that. How wouldn't you pay for the programs? Unless you're financially comfortable enough to not need to get public assistant, or you're too ashamed or have too much pride to look to public programs, you will be thankful for them, & be furious over those who refuse to pay higher taxes to pay for them.

Am I getting thru to ya? Comment.

Senator Reid was quoted in a bk on the '08 election as being racist; oh boy!

2010-01-11T11:44:00.000-08:00

& the GOP chair wants Reid to step down, for it. Reid was quoted in the bk, Game Change, as saying that Obama was only able to run for the office b/c he was "lighter skinned" than others of his race, & he didn't have a "dialect" like other blacks. Sound racist to any of you?

The GOP chair agreed that it was, so, since I've been called that, I guess we should get together &, like the homos out there, we should demand our rights as racists. But Reid immediately sent an apology to Obama who quickly, & quietly, accepted it, by saying, "that chapter/bk is closed". News programs across the nation have been giving bad air to the background of "racism", as if it were a bad thing.

I recall a time here in the deep south back in the 1800s when racism , as it is seen today, was an everyday occurance. I saw the south get changed as my generations, my friends kids generation (b/c my only child was turned into dog food for my familys dogs the night my family was lynched), their kids generation, & THEIR KIDS GENERATION, died out w/o ever raising their white kids proper (proper in the form of the deep south in the antebellum era here in SC).

The south has changed from being accepting of racism to not letting it have the breath of fresh air it thrived on the early to mid-1800s. Times have certainly changed. Racism, it seems is no longer allowed. & whenever it tries to rear it's poor head, blacks & whites alike trample all over it as if it no longer deserved to live and breath.

Racism: gone the way of slavery. Poor thing. Nothing is important down here in the south anymore. Slavery, cotton plantations, southern belles.. Goddamn miss all that. Not allowed anymore. What went wrong? Let me know?

Saw Politics Dailys Carl M. Cannons article defending FNCs Brit Hume & what he said, my opinion

2010-01-09T10:54:00.000-08:00

Fine, if Brit Hume is allowed to pontificate & sell his faith on national tv, I am allowed to sell my views of nigger slavery, big government, high taxes, longer working hrs for lower level company employees, reestablishment of free/slave states w/ a national apology from Uncle Sam for winning the Civil War, kicking women out of both the workforce & voting booth, & I know there are more things I want but I can't think of them off the top of my head.

If Carl Cannon can defend Brit Humes selling of Jesus Christ on christian conservative FNC, by pulling the 1st amendment-card, I should be allowed to preach what I was just asking for in the last paragraph. If not, then hell, Cannon, stop defending one Americans right to free speech over anothers. That sounds like favoritism, & only politicians can do that over the idea of improving the publics life over their own.

Brit Hume says in order for Tiger Woods to save his career he must TAKE JESUS AS HIS SAVIOR!!!

2010-01-06T11:31:00.000-08:00

I'm sure some of you saw him say that on Fox News Sunday on FOX. He reminds me of the guy from liberal MSNBCs Morning Meeting, Dyan something. HE gave a shocking comment a couple wks ago & he hasn't been on the show since. I will not be surprised if Hume is allowed to stay on FNC after that illegal "religion-plug".

FOX doesn't explicitly promote one faith over another, but I guess you need to be George Bush to understand that. They do downplay the promotion of other faiths besides christianity. Mostly they use christian references to get a pt across. Not kyk, raghead or Buddist references. I figure they assume that very few viewers are jewish or muslim. They think that muslims don't watch them b/c they promote global domination of American business over allowing the people of foreign nations to choose whether they want to buy American.

American business advertises that you'd be stupid to not buy American. However we see on the national & international news, what american culture does to those who don't having American rammed down their throats. 9/11 comes to mind.

Brit Hume will now battle former vice dictator Dick Cheney for the position of the "hotest thing in christian republican conservativism", next to Sarah Palin. He will be booed and burned in effegy as friends of mine did to non-southern baptist, non-liberal democrats, non-whites back in the antebellum south. By, I will add, extreme left wing liberals, in words (b/c actions will make the right target that as reason for the right to control the white house & congress).

Hume is a classic example of the religious right wing conservative who will be blasted by the left & praised by the right for saying what he said. He reminds me of the pastor who married Ilsa & myself in 1845. The 1st-3rd times I attended church told me no one there had been to the other side, like I had. During the talks after services, I went up to the paster &, pulling him aside, asked why he was lying to his sheep after what comes after death?

He immediatly became concerned for me, saying "I know you lost your family this month, but if you don't believe anymore, I apologize; but don't take anyone w/ you or I will turned tem against you." W/ that statement, I have since become an atheist &, although I haven't yet preached my views, say to those who ask, in a "I believe" tone, they should choose their own faith, were it the one they grew up w/ or the one their wife is from. I have no faith, b/c all the faiths I have learned about, all end up @ the same place: the after life or next world.

I go there about once or twice a month after a mortal kills me for one reason or another. I don't push my faith on anyone, especially on national tv, & w/ NO ONE TO CHALLENGE ME AFTERWARDS: unlike Brit Hume. Cheers.

Katie is taking Poli Sci 1a this semester. Reading thru, she talked over something she found in 1 bk w/ me

2010-01-04T19:23:00.000-08:00

It was called the "double jeopardy clause" of the constitution. It is where if one is found not guilty of any crime, & evidence is later discovered to prove one guilty, they cannot be tried again for the same crime. It got me thinking about what I've been thru the last 35 yrs. Whomever has been killing the people I have been accused, & later acquitted, of killing, left the evidence to each murder, w/in wks of my being exonerated, in random places.

For example: evidence, connecting me to four of the so far 10 murders I was found not guilty, w/o a shadow of a doubt, of committing in Michigan, have been found in the warehoused file cabinets of a top rated criminal defense attorney from Indiana. Evidence, connecting me to 3 of the so far 13 murders I was found not guilty of committing in Montana have found found in the barn of some random Kansas farm family. Same thing went for 5 of the so far 11 murders in Nevada were found in upstate New York.

I could say more but I would be disparaging my 5th amendment right to self incrimiate.

So let me just sat that SOMEONE is leaving evidence legitimatly connecting me to past crimes I have been found not guilty of. So law enforcement should really stop searching my homes (here in SC, out in Cali & up in NYC) b/c they now know that I don't have the evidence: Someone else does.

More later.

This being New Yrs Eve; here is my resolution

2009-12-31T16:21:00.000-08:00

I resolve to fight the monthly murder charges that will continue to get thrown @ me, & finally try to become satisfied w/ the milestones I have met concerning the 160-yr-old promise I made to my lynched family. Now, thinking about it, I don't know if I'm ready to leave yet. I would be a right-wing conservative republican if I thought there weren't as many as 10-20 murderers created every day. That fact tells me I may be here for a while.

I have plenty of time; I was alloted as much time as I needed. It really was a sucrative deal, that I made w/ the almighty. I wont' explain it here I detail as it is a private deal between, as the Clarence-character on the ABC legal drama Boston Legal said to his co-worker concerning the nun getup he was wearing. Saying that may cause many of you out there across Columbia, SC & the southeast to say, "that proves that you killed [my brother, father, sister, uncle, etc]".

Well, maybe. But the law is very explicit. Unless I say (either here or on the record w/ any journalist) that I did indeed kill those mortals, all the public & law enforcement have is what I have been saying since 1976: While many of you feel for the victims in these murders, you must realize that state and Columbias law enforcement agency and the county medical examiner confirmed that they had all been implicated in other murders. They were murderers. I hve red repeatedly over the yrs, how much many of you, BIBLE-THUMPING GOOD CHRISTIANS, abhor murder. I must then ask, what has made you change face here?

That is my New Yrs Resolution. I can recall last yrs, as many of you can, where I made the same resolution. I kept it this yr, I plan to keep it next yr. Eric will be graduating from USC in May w/ a masters in computer sci, in the summer after which he willl be jetting off for a 2.5 month, nearly $10 million, globe trotting treck (the same as a young Bruce Wayne from the graphically animated Batman film, Gotham Knight) after which he will be put on WGEs payroll as another virus remover who will go from being a part time (during his college yrs) to a full time corporate debugger (after college).

Katie will start her 2nd yr @ USC as a cheerleader (she still really doesn't have any clue as to what her major should be, as is customary for any 2nd yr college student).

See you next yr.

I want to get one thing straight

2009-12-30T10:19:00.000-08:00

Eric has talked to me several times in the last few months about USC classmates of his asking who his father is paying off to stay out of prison. I asked him back, what he's said back? He told me he asked them if they had any evidence or proof to connect me to the crimes I have been connected to since the mid-70s? He said they wanted to know what it was like living w/ an accused mass-murderer?

I asked him what he said? He said thankfully it really never came up growing up. I was quite impressed. But he said, the guys & girls he said that to didn't accept it. He said, it had to have come up, SOMETIME. He then asked me if I had was not telling him something? I asked him why he asked? He said it made him strange. he said he couldn't recall anytime, growing up, when my temperment & attitude, during the court cases, made it obvious that I was guilty of any of the crimes.

We got cream sodas & stood in the kitchen @ the island talking. I told him many a boardmember of Wilks Global had taken me aside or got me on the phone, during every murder case since they 1st started, to ask if I had anything to say? I'd asked, "such as?" They said if I was guilty of the charges? I told them, this is America, & in America, everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

However, since 9/11, the cliche has been reversed: everyone is guilty until proven innocent. & that is why I thought they were asking me about it. They said, although 60% of WGEs voting shares were in Wilks family hands no one of the board could kick me out over the allegations. I told them all that if I were to be kicked out of WGEs leadership, as happened, from 1930-39 & 1948-55, the company would spend all it had in reserve and end up needing to borrow for the 1st time.

As it happened, the 1st time I stepped down from corporate leadership, by the time I came back, it was w/in a couple yrs of needing to raise some capital. @ that pt, I swore that never again, would I leave the company leadership w/o plenty of cushioning. However, were I to step down, it would not be forever. I saw my fears nearly proven right during my return to school in the 50s. Once I came back I didn't leave again.

Between the 3rd time I entered WEs leadership & the mid-70s when I started being accused of murder, I was buying 10 WE shares a month until I had gained an addition 10% stake, @ which pt it was found that I had a 60% stake in WE. This didn't worry th board until the arrests on murder charges started becoming worrysome enough to make WE owners in the public call in concerns over the stygma that my arrests would bring the stock price.

I was reminded of this the 1st day back to work, after the 4th arrest on murder charges. I told everyone the same line: this is America, I will remain innocent until proven guilty. As it turned out in the days leading up to my 1st trial, WE's stock value dropped by over $10. However upon news of my acquital came out, the price regain the ground, plus added another $3-5. This chain of events happened on and off pretty much up until the late 80s, when a male relative of one of the victims shot up a car I was sitting alone in while awaiting the verdict of one case.

I'd seen who it was. Once I awoke in the morge the next morning, I got dressed and went to the courthouse to confront my attacker. Once I was in front of him, he turned as white as a ghost. I saw this & just leaned in to his ear & said: "Now do you believe in immortality?", then walked passed him to enter the building. After that word must have spread of what I'd told him. I wouldn't be shot to death like that until the start of the millenium, when it happened again, for the same reason.

A majority of WGEs board never again challenged my leadership or innocence in any crime, although there were many a time when a fw members questioned my leadership. They were all educated, thankfully not by me.

After our talk, Eric felt more comfortable about standing by his father, whenever anyone questioned my innocences in the murder cases. They haven't stopped. I will remain steadfast declaring my pleasure in the deaths of the people; all of whom, law enforcement & the medical examiner together, have declared murderers in 2-3 other unsolved murders. Just my saying so has made me & labelled me "the accused", even though, according to American law against premeditated murder, the law needs more than my saying what I have said to prove me gulity "beyond a reasonable doubt".

Have a great day everyone.

Met w/ a court-appointed psychiatrist yesterday

2009-12-29T11:56:00.000-08:00

I had to see him. The SC State court needed to prove that I was mentally stable enough to stand trial on a # of counts of premeditated murders. As you may recall from previous entries I had that same job back in the 60s to mid-70s. This one was about 35 (how I wish I could age to that pt). He was a hotshot. Thought he was better @ this than I was.

We met @ his office around 11 am. I wanted to smoke but he said I could after 12. I asked him what he wanted to talk about? He said, wherever I wanted to start. I spoke of my time in his position, 40 yrs ago. All he said was, "ah ha", then wrote something on his large yellow pad. I sat there for a few seconds before he asked me if I would ever marry again? I said I doubted it. The # if southern belles in their mid 20s is shrinking each generation.

He asked what was different about the girls I married before I became a doctor and those after? I told him to check out this website to get a clearer idea. He said he might. HEY DOC? IF YOU'RE READING THIS, YOU GOT A SHIT-LOAD TO LEARN ABOUT PEOPLE!!

I went back into the memories I had collected of the girls I'd wedded and bedded. Almost all the girls prior to WWII were only interested in marrying, settling down & starting families. I really missed that about the mid-19th to mid 20th cent. Girls didn't care about wanting to put me in prison (as they do now). Many of the girls I married in the last century had some of the features I fell in love w/ betwen 1845 & 1960.

However, their desire to have a comfortable life won out over their love for me. I could easily have given all of them a comfortable life, but my alleged connection to murders, anywhere from out west in Cal back here in SC, & the deal they'd all made w/ Uncle Sam to find evidence to connect me to the murders, was too overwhelming for them to see the love the love I had for them. I eventually saw that in them & gave them an ultimatum, every one: either give me back my personals, face divorce & no money to cover your lifestyle until you find your next host, or give me back my personals & divorce & take a healthy amount of money to cover you until you find yor next host.

Luckily I never inpregnated any of the girls I'd wedded then bedded, so they could not demand child support. They all desperatly wanted to have children. No girl I'd wedded prior to the 90s demanded I father kids like these girls did, & that was one suspicion that evolved. I went on w/ the doc on how I warned these girls not to fabricate their time living w/ me; for, if they did, I would bury them in the papers for yrs.

As we all saw, from the tabloids and yellow journalism, they certain did not take the warning w/ a grain of salt. They all took it to heart & didn't make anything up. They all deferred any questions they got about their marriage to me to their attornies. The public never heard what went on in any of the marriages. That explains why the 7 divorces blew over after only a matter of weeks.

I kept goign by saying, since 2004 or 5 I have been telling people I want to marry again. When people ask me what I am looking for a girl, I tell them. Many have said that I set the bar too high; hardly any southern girls today are like the girls I wed prior to 1960. I then say, keep looking, I had faith in my friends to find me one, I don't want to loose hope that the girls I married between 1845 and 1960 are no longer available.

After that, we sat there for a minute or two before he said, "that's it. I'll see you next wk. Go have your smoke". I looked @ him for a second, then got up & left, as if all this was just protocol.

The Blind Side; my opinion

2009-12-28T11:36:00.000-08:00

It gave me mixed feelings. (1) I agree that coloreds will only have chance @ an education if the white family that "owns" them allowed it. I know that sounds racist, but recall the pt of view I'm speaking from.

If that happened, I worry about what coloreds would do w/ it once they had one: an education/raise up against their masters & owners. I saw it happen many times here in the south, & especially here in SC prior to the Civil War (a conflict that cost me, along w/ many of my fellow white southern liberal democratic farmers, our way of life & lifeline).

That is reason 1 why giving blacks an education is a bad idea, & (2), the film, which is 75% true, is a microscopic blip on the radar of American southern white education (stories like this are rare b/c I don't know any white southern family that would do what the Tuoly family did. It was a massive risk picking up a colored teen boy from the projects, academically YRS behind that of most of the white's his age).

I know many white men who, back in the post-WWII, 50s and 60s era, did things I am still proud of them for doing here in the south. Many of them don't like talking to me or beig seen w/ me, b/c of my supposedly "racist" stance on civil rights. They have all told me, repeatedly, "stop living on the past, "that time is long gone", "you still may be strong enough to fight the good fight, but the rest of us are too old to stand up for what you and I want", "You need to go look for those in this generation to keep fighting, if that's what you want; I'm not stronn enough anymore".

It really saddened me. I remember when those same men (now in their 60s and 70s) were in their 20s and 30s. We all had an awesome time periodicallty lynching niggers to scare other blacks into submitting to jim crow. I still want to keep it going, but there aren't enough white liberal southerners willing to fight for what they (& I) strongly beleive in. They don't have the same passion I (& their parents & grandparents) have against giving niggers equal rights.

I didn't vote for any presidential nominee (b/c none of those running on the democratic ticket impressed me). I was really hopping John Edwards would hang in there. But he dropped out when allegations of him fathering an illegit child found it's way into the papers. After that, all there was on the democratic side was a woman & a nigger, & I was dead set against voting for anyone from the party of lincoln (he was a nigger lover) a plus they want to lower taxes,shrink fed gov and turn running gov over to the private sector.

I just can't have that.

Final Word: If you are a nigger-lovin progressive, go ahead & see The Blind Side. I saw it to see what a southern family would do to a tall, strong & stupid nigger (perfect combo for any colored I'd say). I wanted to see them lynch him for raping the familys' teen daughter. I was disappointed. Same was expected of me back in 2002, when I adopted my now 21 yr old daughter, Katie. Let me know if you'd like more detail on her.

Not for evangelical christian children

2009-12-24T13:47:00.000-08:00

During this yrs holiday shopping season, I became confused by an ad on tv selling the "festiveness of Christmas" by Kohls. I tried posting the video so you could see it for yourself but blogger ended up not being able to upload it, so I'll just try to explain it. They sold the idea that it was PARENTS, NOT SANTA CLAUS, who brings kids their presents. We all know about the annual "holiday shopping season". But WHO'S doing the shopping?

I just finished watching a classic 4 hr film from the 70s starring Lee Marvin & a 20-something yr old Jeff Bridges (fresh faced & all) called "The Iceman Cometh". I'd seen it when it 1st came out on tape but, even now, I still don't know WHO THE ICEMAN IS. The film was a very intellectually driven film about an idea called "the pipe dream" (people keep saying they'll get to something soon, maybe tomorrow. Tomorrow comes, & they say 'ah, I can't do it today, I'll do it tomorrow'. Tomorrow comes & you say the same thing. This routine goes on for the next 10, 20, or 30 yrs.)

Pipe Dream. I'm thinking that evangelical christian parents raise their kids to believe in this "pipe dream" so they won't have to deal w/ the problem of having to avoid the Toy-Section of any general store to keep their kids minds off asking them for something. Parents say, "ask Santa" & that's it. SO FUCKING CLEVER. Kids don't ask their parents to buy them anything again: They just wait to see Santa @ the mall, where they sit there for 15 mins, rattling off what, they figured, their parents wouldn't buy them. But Santa will.

Sounds a shit-load like a pipe dream to me. Let me know if I'm incorrect.

I wonder @ what age do evangelical christian kids stop believeing Santa is bringing the toys & they ask what is the "annual holiday shopping season" or "Black Thursday" the day after Thanksgiving. I have heard that some kids as old as 8, 9 & 10 are over believing Santa brings the gifts (& not their parents) I wonder when is the earliest age to break the news to them.

Maybe it's when the kids burst out crying @ school when they are told by older kids of the nonsense of Santa Clause: "Only babies believe in Santa Clause". School staff have a real shitty problem on their hands, since there is a wide variety of ages when kids grow out of it. But who should be the one to break the news to them. (again; WARNING, IF YOU'RE AN EVANGELICAL CHRISTAIN UNDER AGE 13, LEAVE THIS SITE).

I'd like to hear from non-christains to get their perscpective. How long should parents wait to tell their kids about Santa? @ what age should parents agree w/ what their kids older friends say about Santa? Let me know. Comment.

Lighting the Christmas Tree in WGEs Wilks Towers Courtyard night

2009-12-21T16:43:00.000-08:00

Here's a photo of what the tree will look like after 9 pm tonight. If you'll recall, WGE sponsored the local tree last yr, since 1995, when I, as head of WGE, was 1st able to afford to get one ready.

It is closing in on 5 pm now & Eric, Katie & a few USC sorority freshmen coeds are here (they all went up to the 2nd floor; no idea WHAT they could be up to) I'm here on my new HP laptop that my Russian fellow billionaire, Chris Maximoff, shipped to me as a "sorry we can't be there" early Christmas gift. Watching Fox News to see what the party of the nigger-lover Lincoln is saying about the 1 am passing of a healthcare bill. Just so they could say they did SOMETHING. If the bill they passed had a soft baby tooth in it.

Hm. Sorry, I'm getting a video chat request, thru WilksComs webcam video chat service from my kids & the coeds telling me it would be more fun if I came up. Ha. I guess I'll see ya'll @ the Christmas Tree lighting in a couple hrs. I have a few 20 yr olds to satisfy. See ya.

Just getting to the Sunday newspaper mag, PARADE; red an article in the Intelligence Report that made me think

2009-12-21T08:57:00.000-08:00

Under "Soldiers' Children Struggle, Too", it said that the RAND Corp (the international military defense contractor) did a study of kids of deployed armed forces & those kids who have both parents available to them on a daily or wkly basis. It found what many should not be surprised about. Or maybe just I'm not surprised about.

It said that those kids who have one or both parents deployed abroad are more academically, socially, and emotionally dettached from society & frustrated than those who have one or both parents in their lives. This does not surprise me. Let me explain:

This happened in the 1860s & 1910s when many of the kids, of Confederate & WWI soldiers either were on the battlefield or did not come home in 1865 or 1918, ended up the same way the kids of WWII, Korea & Vietnam soldiers did. They were also very much detached from life & society.

I guess many of you out there would only be able to compare the temperments of military brats, after the wars America has been involved in, were over, only thru deep, in-depth study. You wouldn't want to do the research to prove to yourself or others who disagreed that this is true. You would only want to hear it from someone who'd lived thru 3 or more wars. Like I did.

Ask me for more dept if you'd like. It always gives me happiness (& annoyance) to explain events that the national public school system didn't teach the next generation, for reasons I just don't get.

In the last 2 hrs I saw a # of ads on FNC promoting ways to wipe out credit card debt

2009-12-19T17:16:00.000-08:00

It got me questioning: Why are ads like this airing on cable, or tv for that matter? The ads made it sound like the viewer obviously has credit card debt & is in need of getting back their good name & good credit, otherwise... Otherwise... Otherwise what? I don't have any debt. & why should it be expected that any American should?

I think, it goes back to the wks and month after 9/11. The stock market had dropped 200 pts, retailers sales were dropping b/c of less & less shoppers, out fear that where they were woulld be bombed or attacked by the WTC. So, in order to get the economy going again, George W. (liberals like me wouldn't label him a dictator for another couple yrs) went on national tv & said, to an effect, "don't worry about America being attacked again. I will make it a top priority to make sure of that (looks like he kept his promise). While am workin' on that, go back to your routine. Go shopping again. Spend like you're the free American you know in your heart".

We all know what that caused. Credit card companies began building up huge warehouses of accounts. People opened 2, 3, 4 even 5 credit cards to pay for purchases. The American people never saw how much W's war on terror was costing, so we didn't give our incoming credit card bills any thought. If Bush lets paying bills roll off his back, why shouldn't we?

You see where that took us. Bush started us on a few routines we now regret: oweing China over a trillion dollars, we stopped making products international populations need, started making things that are fun for enjoyment, don't help improve our lives. Do any of you out there, who voted for Bush once or twice, now regret voting for him? You probably won't comment, out of embarrassment.

But take a second to mull over in your mind what voting for Bush did for America: 4,500 men & women between the ages of 18-30 killed in a conflict that a man, who's now out of office, started for, as we know now, no logical reason besides a personal vendetta (the target almost killed his father when HE was pres), & taking out loans from China to fund the attack (he was definitely not liberal (a liberal would have raise income taxes nationally to pay for anything the gov wanted to undertake))

After watching 2 hrs of credit card debt ads on FNC, I switched to local channels. Know what I saw, car ads, car insurance ads, teeth whitening ads, investing ads. We are in a recession (ask any conservatvive) how can any of America's botton 80% afford any of that? Tell me, b/c I really can't get my head around it, & I've been here for 190 yrs.

Got another email from Marcus

2009-12-19T14:44:00.001-08:00

The young man I met on my visit to Israel told me in an email saying yesterday, mid-day, his uncle stopped by to take his father & dog for a walk. They both had a laugh about how, although Congress was taken aback by what sent. Al Franken said to sent. Joe Lieberman, they said it was classically jewish. That no one but a jew woul get what Franken did.

I'd say: if that's how kykes are, esp, kykes in public office, then I'd rather have some one else in their place. Congress has better things to do than allow for jewish humor to slow progress for national health insurance, high taxes, big gov, revoking women & blacks sufferage and their right to hold jobs outside the field & home, down.

That's all I have to say.

I'm not going out today; it's snowing. I was thinking of something yesterday that I wanted to say

2009-12-19T14:11:00.000-08:00

Should I thank and appreciate WGE's local, state, national & international customers for making me a self-made billionaire? I don't think so.

If I wasn't making and selling what I do, industrialized nations across the globe where I sell my products would not be as technologically advanced as they current are. If I wasn't making the gadgets and machines that I do, we would have plenty of time in our lives. We would be back in the 1950s & 60s. People would have to find stuff to do. Oh, the good old days. I'd like to go back.

But then someone else would make the $50 million/yr instead of me. I wouldn't want that. America & 80% of the worlds industrialized nations would be filling their days w/ activities that they did a century ago. I would love to go back to that. But it's not what the people want. If there was anything I learned during my 8 yrs in pro-wrestling w/ Vince McMahons WWF/E it was, "give the people what they want".

Maybe it was rather what HE thought they wanted (he never really challenged the ethical & moral standard of the industry; whether what he was promoting was healthy for both the talent & the fans as we know from the HBO doc on deaths in pro-wrestling) rather than what they were paying to see.

I recall he said that to The Rock when The Rock came back from Hollywood after making a few films in 2001. He was going up against McMahons kids who had sold all their WWF stock in order to fund the purchase and merger of both ECW & WCW.

I would rather take the country back to the antebellum era but that wouldn't sell many copies. I learned that once I became a billionaire in 1991/2. So I won't try to sell a "return to the antebellum era" lifestyle. I make more money giving the people real time use of tech from sci fi films. I know that from the performance of W.E.s (Wilks Enterprises, Inc.), W.G.s (Wilks Global, Inc.) & W.G.E.s (Wilks Global Enterprises) IPOs and the gradual rise of the stock price of all three companies.

It's snowing out there!! But seeing how I only have desserts & junk food for late night snacks, I will end up going out to eat today. I'm going to call a local boy to drive a snow plow to clear the drive to the front gate. Check ya later.

Got an email from the boy Marcus from my trip to Israel yesterday after he'd red a few entries

2009-12-17T12:23:00.001-08:00

Said he disagreed w/ a few of my views. He objected to my strict and stonch opposition to affirmative action, women & blacks sufferage and womens social movement from working only @ home to working anywhere they wished. He also objected to my stance on niggers roles in American society. He thought I was racist. Maybe I am, the word is honestly not in my lexicon.

He couldn't imagine how any member of Congress, or of national law enforcement, could exchange investigating my connection to the murders I have been vocal about over the last 30 yrs & some how not fabricate any evidence oor pay any random person to testify as a witness to the murders, to connect me to the murders for making quick easy money in the stock market.

Reminds me of the kyke journalist who refused to take half a mil in exchange for keeping, what he found out about a Japanese mafioso, quiet. He took a bounty on his head over early retirement. Some people care more about having a comfortable retirement while alive than worry about carrying on an honest, moral, ethical life so they can get into heaven. Guess some of Congress and law enforcement aren't really religious.

Back @ cha.

Saw the episode of The Good Wife where Julianna went up against a judge who she worried was racist

2009-12-17T11:43:00.000-08:00

If any of you saw that episode, you would have seen the judge (who was the same actor who played Demi Moores characters new boyfriend or who arranged the murder of Patrick Swayzes character in the film Ghost) who accused Juliannas character of accusing him, a judge (in quotes) of being racist.

That sent me into a rant @ my custom 75" flat panel widescreen about how I wouldn't let any, ANY, judge use their bench to pass judgement on those the public thought shouldn't be let back on the street. I've arranged several, now-former judges to be convicted on corruption charges (who took bribes, gifts, and free annual memberships @ a host of clubs in exchange for giving innocent people life in prison or the death penalty and give guilty people a slap on the wrist and back on the street), to serve their death penalty sentence, one I changed to life, @ my prison, The Dungeon.

I have never let any mortal who has less than a 70 yr career in law or business, look @ me as a 29 yr old man who should show respect to the elder. Judges have been taken aback by my statements of judging their 30+ yr career in law to my career in business (going back to the 1920s). They all thought I was insulting their record. I'd asked them if they were insulting my career in business? They said I wasn't old enough to claim a 70 yr career in business; maybe my family, but not me alone.

[Sign] Once again, people, don't judge a book by its cover. How did any of them, or you, know that The Scarlet Letter was about adultery in the Puritan era of the 1680s and 90s? UNTIL YOU RED THE DAMN BOOK (or you cheated by asking a friend who felt for your annoyance @ having to read a book writen in Old English?)!!!

I really don't like people like that. People who think they can judge a book, OR A PERSON, by its cover. You can see in everything I say or the films I make or books I write; the people and personalities that just rub me the wrong way & I don't hold back from saying how I feel. It's cost me friends, but @ least I'm honest w/ people. Most people prefer to be bullshitted. I don't. & I don't get people who would rather be lied to so they won't have to confront people's negative opinion of them.

You'll know if I can tell if you're bullshitting me. I'll tell you, & most of the people I've confronted, have either exited my life or been honest w/ me from then on. Everyone is different, as I have discovered over the last generation.

More later.

How long did economists say it would take for the DOW to go from where it was last fall back to above 10k?

2009-12-16T14:55:00.000-08:00

I heard 20 yrs. I made 5, $500 million-dollar purchases across a few industries last fall, when the DOW was below 7,800. Now, as many of you have seen, the Dow is returned to above 10,400. Did I make money? I'll leave that answer up to you.

This fall, people were very surprised @ how gitty I was. I hadn't told very many people about the purchases. I figured the IRS would get wind of it eventually. They would send agents to talk to me & once they heard what I plan to tell them, they'll most likely go back &, from their office, send me a subpoena to appear before Congress & the SEC to explain how I knew the crash wwas coming & why I didn't tel anyone.

Ya know, that just comes w/ being around for the last century. I figure, if any of them were in my position, they too wouldn't say. Being immortal comes w/ restrictions. Congress will most likely consider that a slap in the face: THERE'S NOT SUCH THING AS IMMORTALITY. IT ONLY HAPPENED IN THE BIBLE!!! How little those kids know. They just never met anyone like me before. I went thru this @ the tip of the Great Depression. I've explain those events to to the pt of making some people annoyed, so I leave knowing about those events to you to go back into the archives.

Chao.

From last nights episode of the PBS Newshour

2009-12-16T14:32:00.000-08:00

Business & Finance correspondent Paul Solomon interviewed economist George Shultz from Stanfords Hoover Institution. He claimed a few pts I agreed w/. (1) If a company, over a 30 yr span, gradually builds its coffers from which to promote itself and buy up smaller rivals to diversity its portfolio, grows from a million-dollar business to a multiBILLION dollar business, & parts of it begin to cause trouble for the company. But the company can't sell off the rubbish b/c no one would want just the bad parts.
So what does a company do when multiple wings of it's organization begins to cost the company money, but no one wants to buy it from them & the rest of the company (@ least 60% of it) is making profits? (1st pt & question). (2nd pt & question) If one has no personal funds, no personal liability, in a company, and the company is mismanaging its funds, is in sight of failing, & begs the fed gov for help; what does the commander-in-chief do? HE doesn't have any stake in the company, but he was most likely elected by @ least a 5th or a quarter of the companies stockholders. Shultz thought the company should pay for its misdeeds, the gov should not get involved.

Did any of ya'll out there see the interview? Comment.

I'm no jew-lover, but Obama needs to answer to something

2009-12-15T17:09:00.000-08:00

His administration continues to give its position, on Irans building of a nuclear weapon or power plant, as "warning them not to keep going" & trying to go about it "diplomatically". No threats of impending bombings. What will Uncle Sam tell the Israeli lobby in Washington when Iran flattens the state of Israel after Israel left, dealing w/ Irans impending threat of nuclear attack, up to Uncle Sam?

"We thought they would agree to be diplomatic. We were wrong." What will the Israel lobby do now.

Obama is shocked that the banks he & Bush used public funds to bailout, paid the loans back & weren't expecting to cap exec pay

2009-12-14T20:55:00.000-08:00

Now THAT I can't get over. Obama is trying to "wean" Wall St off of the air Bush was circulating thru Wall St's ventalation sys since after he won reelection in '04. The air of "little oversight" or "deregulation". Obama needs to realize it won't be in his 1st yr as, what Morgan Freemans character in Lean on Me called himself, the HNIC (Head Nigga In Charge), that he, as the new liberal dem, will be able to untie all the knots, he & the rest of the dems in gov claim, conservative pres W. Bush tied between 2001 & 2008.

Obama doesn't know how Wall St works. He didn't come for the Chicago-wing of the street. He was a COMMUNITY ORGANIZER. But I did. I was trained by the OB (Original Banker) JP Morgan (back in the 1890s). One thing I learned fast from him: If banks could slowly raise their compensation rate to ABOVE an absurd level, they will, until Uncle Sam decides to put Wall St pay rate caps up for debate. I have seen them try it over the last century but nothing really came of them.

Now, this NIGGER is so wet-behind-the-ears to be shocked by banks, who were saved from becoming a part of history, who paid back the money that saved them & now has filed to stash away $16B from newly made profits to pay for yr end exec compensation. The man was only in public office for 2 yrs (barely) before he became the "Ramses of the US ". He has no idea how these people work. But his predecessor did. & I do.

This COLORED, needs a lecture on Banking in the Post-Bush Era 101. He could learna thing or two. That is all.

New class action lawsuit

2009-12-10T11:12:00.000-08:00

I'm here @ my office to rant about how different America is now than it was prior to the 20th century. An example: I came in this morning to see a letter addressed to "Mr. Jeremi Wilks". Upon opening found it to be a subpoena to appear in SCT State court to respond to charges of affirmative action violations, brought by 50-80 current and former WGE employees.

They ranged from women to non-white men & women ranging in age from 40-80. They were all joining together to suing me over quite progressive ideas: the right to be paid for the same work completed by a white male. It made me snort outloud to my empty office. I didn't wonder why. I know why. I have recieved legal forms like this in every generation since affirmative action was 1st strictly enforced back in the 1960s.

I have to go into court to fight for rights that, since I 1st started refusing to obey affirmative action, I have expected to have. Since the Civil Rights Movement here in the south in the 60s, I have been sued over that idea by non white non males. I go into court and demand my rights. Each time I am told that "times are changing", "I need to come into the 20th century", "did you learn that from your grandparents?" & other remarks.

I have ended up having my hand forced to pay people who, I think, don't deserve the same pay as white males. Since saying that w/o sounding worried or confused, people have labeled me as racist, sexist, ageist & a bigot. I have said before what I say back to them & people ask me why I feel this way? I tell them that this is how I was raised. They then ask where I was raised? I tell them, and they ask, then you must be a conservative. I say no, I'm a liberal.

They say, "but your white. Aren't all white southerners conservative? I say today yes, but when I was growing up almost all whites were liberal. They ask when? I say in the 1820s-40s. They don't believe that I am that old. I tell them I honestly believe those who educated & trained me for business & finance would turn over in their graves if I willing obeyed affirmative action.

@ this people just walk away, streaming mad, mutter, "how could a guy like that stay out of prison or a mental hospital?" This happens every generation when neew kids come into the work force &, working for me here in the US, find that the pay rate WILL be different for genders & races. People are quite surprised by this every time. Each class asks if I didn't learn my lesson the last time? I say I was trained one way & "Old habits die hard".

More later.

I got a call from Chris Maximoff today . . .

2009-12-05T16:20:00.000-08:00

He said he'd recieved an invitation to his 25th high school reunion. I was busy in my "Drawing Room" (formerly the nursery I and my brothers and sisters grew up in the deep south's antebellum era). It was set aside for drawing up new products to mass-produce and bring to market. I had come up w/ a product idea in the last month in response to software giant and former industry monoply Microsofts touch screen computer table that would be placed in commerical and business centers; 1st here in the states then across the planet.

I wanted to keep perfecting the product I was thinking up. I won't explain it hear (I want the $10B the 1st 100,000 copies will bring). But I hadn't talked to the Russian-American in a yr. So I put down my charcual pencil, got up and went to side in a bucket seat recliner in the living room. I told him he was speaking his age. He asked when my next high school reunion was?

I told him the high school I attended was burned during the Civil War when almost everything deep southern or Confederate was burned to the ground by the northern yanks. He apologized, saying he'd forgotten that I didn't look my age. I told him not to worry; besides reuniting w/ my family in heaven, the only other wish I had was to see my 30th birthday, seeing how my aging process was cut on my 29th birthday.

I told him, however, that my 5oth college reunion was coming 2010. He was surprised, saying, it's been that long? I took it w/ a grain of salt, saying that although I'll LOOK like the youngest one there, I'll mentally be the OLDEST one. I was expecting plenty of boys and girls to accept my immortality. I knew not a whole lot of people from the 1-200 some odd person class would be there. Many would have died in the last 20 yrs. The median age @ graduation was between 25 and 35; unlike the normal demographic of todays college graduates who range from as young as 18 to as old as 65-70.

Many of USCs Class of 1960 are local WGE employees and some are enjoying retirement living on their retirement money from WGEs pension fund. As a side note, the WGE pension fund has a "blind trust opt in/out clause" saying that new hires can choose to give full authority of where their taxes are invested to WGEs board of directors. Many in the 1st 5 yrs the idea was implemented refused to allow for free range of investment of their taxed income w/o prior knowledge.

But once some of those new hires (some of whom had been hired w/in 10 yrs of retirement age), retired between age 65 and 70, cashed in their retirement, they'd seen that they had doubled or tripled the interest paid the investment. When some asked where the money had been invested, WGEs board stated that I had chosen the placed to invest and I wouldnt' say where except for the pt that none of the places were illicit.

Since then, 80% of new hires opt in to the blind trust retirement option for where their company taxes would be invested. Still, no one but myself knows where the money invested. Congress has even expected me to appear before one of their panels to explain if I know what stocks will be hot, why I don't work on Wall St?

I've said that picking good stocks can't be taught @ the college-level. It only comes w/ experinecews watch the market react to current national events. I've watched the stock market since the dawn of the 20th century. They've all asked if I was mocking panel. None of them believed me. Didn't expect any of them to.

I ended my call w/ Chris by saying we'd be back up in NYC next Christmas. I was hosting a WGE Christmas in the square outside Wilks Tower here in Columbia this yr. I told him to say hi to his boys for me and he told me to say hi to mine. I told him Eric & Katie were bring over USC coeds to play w/ tonight. He said OK, in an ironic tone. Then we hung up.

People who have red my entries wanted to know why I sound so angry & disallusioned; I am sure I have explained it prior but I'll do it again

2009-12-05T07:47:00.000-08:00

I was not ALWAYS like how many of you have seen me over the last generation. There was long time when murder couldn't possibly be connected to me. People were being murdered on a daily basis in every decade since Reconstruction (in the post-Civil War 1870s-90s). People are still being killed on a daily basis today, only I believe the uban legend, created in the 80s and 90s based on the method of all the murders I have been acquited of, has helped reduce the # of murders that occur.

Maybe I need to publish the 1st 30 yrs of my mortal life and 1st 75 yrs of my IMmortal life for ya'll to get the full brunt of what made me how you across America have come to see me. What caused me to be connected w/ unsolved murder and mass-murder is that my family was murdered by a local gang here in SC (back then there weren't as much industry, concrete, steel and glass as there is today. Mostly SC & the deep south was agrarian/industry was up north).

They were hired by a company from NC, which was THAT states equivalent of my fathers business, wanted to buy my father out, to dominate the industry they and my father dominated since the post-war-of-1812 era. They almost succeeded in doing what they'd planned. Only I wasn't willing to take "early retirement" in the afterlife. I was too P.O.ed, as the generation raised @ the millenium call it, to think going to heaven @ that pt was the best bet for me.

I was given a chance to rid my soul and heart of anger before returning to heaven. The way I did it was by sending sinners of murder to hell as soon as possible. As it turned out, once I had made the decision on how to regain happiness in my life, I also had the hard decision of how to bypass the federal, state & local law against killing people. I had no idea how to do it. I had never killed anyone in my life (that was why, once I got to heaven, hell wasn't offered as a place to go).

So I held onto the desire to send murderers to hell until I could effectively send them to hell w/o having to deal w/ the mortal law against it. I never out-n-out went around asking locals how to do it; I waited until a mortal was able to do it. That didn't happen until the Roaring 20s, almost a century later. @ that pt I learned of an up and coming mobster up north in Chicago; Al 'Scarface' Capone. News of him beating murder charges had spread down here. So I left SC for Chicago to learn from him.

I 1st got a month of shadowing to see how his outfit worked, then was given my 1st job. I didn't do so well. It was my 1st kill, the moment it happened it was in the heat of all the drama. Once we got back to club where Capone planned attacks, the whole gang congradulated me on my 1st kill, Capone himself said "the more I do it; the cooler I will become". As I recieved more jobs, he was right; I got better. After two yrs in Chicago I signed a oath that I wouldn't become a rat for the cops and returned home to SC.

@ that pt I opened WE and ran it until the start of the Great Depression. During that time, I saw people being killed almost on a daily basis & wanted to help. But hesitation returned to my system and held back from going thru w/ it. But I saw a few mobsters across the country doing what the little people wanted to do to business, banking and finance: John Dillinger, Machine Gun Kelly and others were going across the country robbing banks & getting away w/ it b/c everyone who COULD rat them out didn't. Everyone had sympathy for them.

During the 1st couple yrs of the depression I heard about another group of mobsters up north in NYC called "The Syndicate" led by 2 kykes (Meyer Lansky/Ben 'Bugsy' Segal) and an Italian ('Lucky' Luciano) who were doing quite well doing what the Capone Mob had trained me to do in the ealry 20s. I voted myself out of WEs presidency and moved up to NYC. I easily got into the syndicate by pulling the "former-Capone Moib hitman"-card.

I continued my training & got better until one of the head mobsters (Ben Segal) said he wanted to go out to Hollywood & "check out the ladies out there". Luciano and Lansky demanded he take protection as the nations law enforcement agencies were getting more experience gathering evidence against the syndicate. Segal picked me. I didn't want to go. I was enjoying my training and doing jobs for the organization. I had also been planning to off members of the syndicate.

Couldn't do that now. I left w/ Segal put my plans on hold. Moving to Hollywood stopped my jobs and turned me into a bodyguard only used to rough up people who "bugged bugsy" no pun intended. I stayed w/ Segal until I won the 1st of now 10 Oscars when Segal was shot @ his home and the syndicate called me back to NYC. I told them I wanted out. They said no, I might talk. I swore I wouldn't. Lansky wanted to shoot me to make it easier for the organzation. But Luciano offered something like what Capone offered me a contract that said if I DID talk, they could off me.

I agree to it. I returned to SC in '38 w/ a few film ideas waiting for me in Hollywood. I ran WE until WWII broke out. You should have read my war story on Veterans Day this yr so I'll bypass that time. Upon coming home from Euro I enrolled @ USC to rebuild my degrees (South Carolina Colleges student records had been destroyed along w/ almost everything else Confederate during the Civil War/there was no record of BA in Business Admin) I spent the latye 40s to /60 @ USC, earning 5 or 6 masters degrees, incl being a member of USC inaugural MBA program.

I left my killing past behind from '60 to '75 when I grew tired of the almost daily news of murders. So the next time a mortal killed me, I asked to see murderers and their victims so I could get back to why I wasn't aging (I was immortal & why was I immortal? B/c I had been murdered unjustifyably. Well?). Once I started dreaming of murders across the state & the nation & was told where to find the clear proof and evidence to connect the murderers to 2-3 previous murders I started feeling better getting closer to being w/ my family.

The rest is history. That is why I am angry. I'm tired of murderers getting away w/ murder. Yes there are too many murderers for the # iof law enforcers to deal w/ to loose sleep over. But I have eternity to deal w/ these roaches. I don't want to think that I'll be here for the next 2-300 yrs, I just want make a big enough dent in the pre-meditated murder rate on American soil before feeling content w/ the # of murders being dealt w/ by law enforcement.

My problem is the federal, state and local law against pre-meditated murder that comes w/ either a 25 yr to life in prison to death penalty sentence. More later.

Watching FNC today got me thinking about republicans

2009-12-04T20:53:00.000-08:00

Republicans are blaming everything that Bush did, that ended badly, on Obama/even though Obama didn't create or cause any of the badness, only inherited it. They won't admit that anything Bush did went wrong or was a bad idea. They only blame the liberal dem in the highest public office for any negative results of any project their conservative republican leader from 2000-2008 implemented.

They will take credit for any idea that succeeded/even if there were fewer than 5 republicans leading the bills charge. But they will not take any blame if a proposal or bill fails or turns sour even if it was their idea in the 1st place. It was always the liberal dems fault it didn't succeed.

More later.

Sarah Palins bk "Going Rogue" is a best seller; But who will make it that way? I'll tell you

2009-12-03T11:11:00.000-08:00

Liberal cable channel MSNBC, non-partisan and left-wing comics are turning up their noses @ the idea of her bk becoming an instant bestseller. They all wanted to know "who would be illeducated enough to want to know what she has to say?". I'll tell you, there are people out there (the broadcast networks have done a few segments on those who would be buying her bk).

You don't have to buy her bk to know what she has to say (some of you out there may well be that damn curious) the things she writes about in the bk really have the same leanings as Glenn Becks and Bill o'Reilly's bks. They are all really only targeting those who voted for her, watch them on Fox and those who are friends of hers (Palin) on Facebook.

The bk isn't really for liberals, and christian conservatives and other neo-con would find it as just another piece of merchandise to fund the republican-wings retaking of Congress and the White House in '12. Palin's bk is just another way to for her to make some money. She's no longer AK govnr, so no more taxpayers money for her. She thinks people want to know the inside story on what happened since McCain announced her VP nomination and her side of events that have blown up since she lost the election.

They are out there.

Liberals think people would be nuts to buy into O'Reilly's, Beck's, Coulter's, Dennis Miller's rhetoric and conservatives think the reverse - w/o anyone getting killed. That's the beauty of American democracy. If this were to happen anywhere else in the world, bodies would be pilling up. We sound so much more civilized but we only go about "knocking people off" out of the public eye.

That is not how Americans refute ideology of a different color. We talk; we don't kill. Not all of us @ least. There are some who don't refute others views in a professional matter. They don't out and out demand someone head on a plater, but the followers of people like this will follow thru w/ it, and end up getting killed themselves. The leaders or the pundits (John Hagee, Joel Osteen, Palin, O'Reilly, Beck and Coulter) don't have to take responsibility for what they preach.

They don't out and out say "go kill so and so b/c they did and are doing this" they say people like this are "doing the devils work; they need to die". But they hold back from picking straws to go do it. Same w/ christain conservatives. They refuse to believe that Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, Bush and others sent young men and women in the military to their deaths between 2001-08. They refuse to believe that America is the biggest bad ass on the planet and that she has the best healthcare, and Uncle Sam should not raise taxes in a recession.

All that juicy stuff. Those are the people who will pick up Palins bk. End of story.

Oh my g-d, tv ads for prescription drugs

2009-12-01T11:20:00.000-08:00

Erectle Disfunction (Cialis, Lavetra, Viagra), Alzhiemers Disease (Aricept and others), bone loss (Boneva) and the list goes on. What do the ad agencies say about airing the ads for ED treatment during dinner when kids under 15 are eating w/ the family? "Mom, dad, what's erectile disfunction?" The prescription drug industry has no restrictions as to how far they can push their ridiculousness.

Reminds me of liberal film maker Micheals Moores film from 2007, Sicko. the drug companies paid members of Congress to pass a bill that will loosen restrictions on what they could and couldn't show in their ads. Looks like SOMEONE can be bought. That idea reminds me of a 60 Mins episode from a while back. Of a jewish journalist who learned of a Japanese Mafioso who, b/c of the lifestyle of people in his position, needed a kidney replacement. The mafioso offered the FBI his services as a rat in exchange for going from the bottom of the waiting list for a kidney transplant to the next one in line.

The FBI grabbed @ the opportunity. The mafioso came over, got his new liver and, upon returning home, disappeared into society. Wait, what happened to the part when he ratted out his gangmembers? Well, it never happened and the people here America who SHOULD have recieved the kidney, died. When the jew told the mafia that he was going to publish his findings, they offered him $500k to be quiet.

Did he take the money like a good little Christians would? No, b/c the man was a kyke and most kykes care more about honestyand benefiting the masses than protecting themselves either physically or financially. I'll bet any of you out there would have taken the money and taken early retirement. What a good like Christian. So the man remains in Japan; w/a death sentence on his head for publishing what he learned. Well, looks like SOMEONE CAN'T be bought.

The ridiculousness of perscription drug ads on tv. Thanks to the buyable members in Congress, the drug makers have very little restriction as to what they can do to sell a product. Like Mike Huckabee said a while back on the left-leaning talk radio NPR: we need to refresh the people in Congress to get new eyes and bodies in there, seeing how those who are there now are buyable by private interests and don't care to protect the public (only themselves).

Or maybe just the ones he (Huckabee) or I don't like. That sounds biased, doesn't it?

Happy Thanksgiving South Carolina; Here's my $2

2009-11-25T14:06:00.001-08:00

I, as a respectable southern gentleman, disregarded the declaration, by the nigger-lovin' senator-turned-pres Abe Lincoln, to take whole day to thank g-d for what I had. No honorable southerner @ that time really cared what a northern nigger-lovin' person, especially one who had, according to most of the voters here in the south, stolen the election, declared "should be a tradition".

My employers (most from the industrial north), when they and others northerner liek them began their "Reconstruction" of the literally and figuratively "burned and broken" south, began asking me to come up north for the holiday. I told them to ask me next yr. I felt like I would be betraying my southern family by dining w/ those who considered, thought and lived among niggers as if they were like everyone else, and not as property, as they did here.

The following yr, I accepted an invite to go up north, and saw a whole different world than what was normal in the deep south. Niggers were doing everything and were living as if they either never heard of slavery or didn't want to concern themselves w/ the subject. I dined every odd yr w/ my employer and every even yr @ home. They reluctently accepted it, saying they didn't want me getting too comfortable w/ the idea that "african-americans", as they called niggers, were less than human and only worth of the title of "property".

I asked them if I thought my political opinions were off limits to discuss b/c it was a rough subject for a southerner? They let it go seeing how the conversation wasn't going anywhere. The up north odd yr/@ home even yr decision lasted until 1924, when I opened Wilks Enterprises (WE). By the way, for the girls I married, I stopped making the trips up north, and stayed home w/ her family. Once she lost her battle w/ a disease that would be cured w/in the next five yrs, I restarted the odd yr @ employer/even yr @ home idea.

Once I became a self-employed business owner (in 1924), I began celebrating Thanksgiving w/ families from around the community. I did that until the depression hit in 1930 when I voted myself out of the presidency of WE and left SC. For the next decade I celebrated w/ people in NY who were not considered or seen as "fine upstanding members of the community". But they saw me as needed, so they invited me to their meals. That continued until 1937, when one of them asked me to come out to Hollywood, Calif for a yr.

I said fine, and left for the west coast; hadn;t been there in over a century (although I didn't tell the guy I was going w/ that). I had Thanksgiving in Hollywood until I won an oscar for a film I'd starred in. Once that happened the people i'd been working for the last decade gave me an ultimatum: acting or them? I chose acting, but they didn't agree. We got together, and smoothed things other (although they wouldn't call it "smooth").

Once WWII broke out, I signed a business contract w/ Uncle Sam to go to Euro and kill as many Nazis as I could. (Ya'll already know how I felt and still feel about Nazis) My front was of an American businessman try to sell my products (electronic technology) to anyone, even Nazis. Although the Germans didn't celebrate Thanksgiving (they thought of it as an Allied Forced Holiday and against Deucheland ideology), I celebrate their mid-Nov war victories w/ them (then I killed them).

Once the war ended I returned home, got my medal and payment for work completed and enrolled in school @ USC. It was there I met the girl I'd live w/ until she commite suicide in '75. We celebrated 2 or 3 Thanksgivign as GF and BF (girlfriend and boyfriend for some of you) before tieing the knot. We celebrated every odd yr w/ her family @ her parents home and every even yr w/ her family @ my father home.

In 1970 I met a young Russian-American man by the name Christopher Maximoff. I'd heard if his family. They owned and ran the Maximoff Corporation, a conglomerate (not unlike WGE is today) that oversaw a whole series of subsidiary companies across the globe. I decided to celebrate Thanksgiving w/ them for a whole. My wife @ the time was fine w/ it. We did that until she killed herself.

I didn't going to the Maximoffs that yr, I wanted to mourn her death. Once I mourned her death, I returned the Maximoffs to celebrate. I did that until 2000 when, Chris hit me w/ news: his 80 yr old father, Michael, who'd been retirement from the NC leadership for ten yrs already, wanted back into the leadership. He was worried that the board, made up mostly of men w/in ten yrs of retirement, would agree to it. He worried about becomeing 2nd in command for the 1st time.

The following Thanksgiving, Chris was no longer @ the head of the table, an 80 yr old man was. Chris introduced us. It was a very quiet meal. Except for the old man. he never stopped talking about the things he was doing now that he was back @ work. I had never seen Chris so quiet.

The following yr, I introduced the world to my son, Eric. I took him to the Maximoffs for Thanksgiving in 2002. After a couple time going i decided to celebrate the holidays in a different metropoliton city after another that had a WE or WGE owned hotel in it, and spent the nights in the presidential suite.

In 2004, I adopted Katie Cole, and together the three of us, go from company dinners to the holidays in Euro, to holidays w/ the Maximoffs, (Micheal died in 2007, and once that happened Chris was back on top). We've been doing that routine ever since.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone. Don't eat too much, you won't be able to sleep. See you @ Christmas.

Gold is @ $1,165/oz; how much do I own, do you ask?

2009-11-23T10:53:00.000-08:00

I have about 30 lbs of 90% pure gold from my 2 yrs working @ Sutter's Fort in the mid- to late-1840s. I got the job after my parents convinced me to take some time off after college graduation to "find myself" as the now old cliche says. Sutter was going up and down the eastern seaboard (the farther west one went in the 1840s, the less able bodied young men there were) looking for able bodied young men.

Besides my parents pushing, a few other college friends of mine jumped @ the idea of going to so far "uncharted lands". I found the majority of the gold in the yr prior to the news breaking out. In retrospect, I really feel bad for Sutter. He tried so hard to maintain his land grant from the wetback gov of Mexico. He tried desperately to contain the fact that a extremely valuable (and limited, back east) mineral had been found on his land. But once men my and his age back east came plowing thru, his fort was quickly taken over.

& since the law of the east had yet to go out west, brash egotistical young men, quick w/ the gun, could threaten, and even pull off, death on anyone out west, didn't matter who'd been there longer. As we know now, Sutter gained AND LOST a fortune, in the span of a decade. While so many other guys my age were questioning my judgement about leaving an untamed, undomesticated, lawless land for civilization, I am so glad I left when I did: @ the start of the Calif Gold Rush: when three quarters, or more, of the country and half the world, was cutting their way to Calif, I was among the 25% who was going home.

Less conspicuous I think. No one stopped us. Even the outlaws out west didn't stop us from leaving. None suspected that the wagon (@ times) or the train (@ other times) was carrying treasure back home. They all suspected that since a man of my age was leaving the region, it must have been obvious that I was broke. I told them all I had was diaries, food, clothes and letters i'd recieved fro back east during my time out west.

They took me @ my word. Strange by todays standards of an Out West outlaw.

Fast forward a century and a quarter (to around the mid-1970s). Uncle Sam was promoting the idea of folks selling their gold to the gov for top dollar. Millions were sold on it. I wasn't. They @ 1st started sending me letters offering to buy my gold for good deals (that last a couple yrs). I never answered them. Then about the time Eric was in preschool (early 80s), burly men w/ thick muscular necks came to see me about selling my gold. They also promised me a good deal. I said no and asked them to leave.

By the late 80s, I started getting calls @ night warning me to sell my gold or risk never seeing my son again. I told them I don't do threats. If they kill my son, I'll let lose on some in the federal gov. They said that would be a crime. I told them what they were warning me about was also a crime. They ended the calls by warning me to sell my gold on the next business day when a prepaid box arrives @ my door.

It came. I put it in the fireplace and burned it. A few yrs passed w/ no word. It was now the mid-90s. One day the same kind of men came to see me @ my office and asked in a different way and for different reasons for me to sell my gold to Uncle Sam. . . . I'd get a really good deal. I told them to leave. I wasn't interested. I wasn't visited by guys like that until the early part of this decade.

They said that gold prices are now @ an all time high, I should sell. The price was in the high $800s. I siad no. They came this yr once gold hit $1000. They asked me again, this time different people. I still said no. I'm waiting for it to hit $10,000/oz. They said it may not reach that pt. I laughed histerically and after I got control of myself I told them that was what they said when gold hit $900, see where that got them? I told them I was going to wait. I told them to come back when gold hit $10,000. I joked that they may have moved on or given up on getting to me to sell to them by then.

They ended up thanking me then left. If any of you out there DON'T believe gold will reach $10,000, your just as pessemistic as those who said the DOW wouldn't be back @ 10,000 for twenty yrs after it dropped two yrs ago. Experience won again against current trends.